Meta-analysis of the Portfolio Dietary Pattern and Cardiometabolic Risk

NCT ID: NCT03534414

Last Updated: 2018-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2018-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines have not made any specific recommendations regarding the Portfolio diet, a dietary pattern that includes nuts, viscous fibre, plant protein, and plant sterols. To update the recommendations, the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the EASD commissioned a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to summarize the available evidence from controlled trials of the effect of the Portfolio dietary pattern on LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and other established cardiometabolic risk factors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: The Portfolio Dietary Pattern, which includes nuts, viscous fiber, plant protein, and plant sterols, has been shown to have a cholesterol-lowering effect similar to that of early statin medications. Despite the endorsement of the Portfolio Dietary Pattern by major international diabetes and cardiovascular guidelines, the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines for nutrition therapy have not made any specific recommendations for the Portfolio Dietary Pattern. The present systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was thus commissioned by the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the EASD to summarize the available evidence from controlled trials of the effect of the Portfolio dietary pattern on LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and other established cardiometabolic risk factors.

Need for proposed research: High quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses of controlled trials represent the highest level of evidence to support dietary guidelines and public health policy development. As dietary guidelines and public health policy have shifted toward food and dietary-pattern based recommendations, there is a need for a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the pooled effect of the Portfolio Dietary Pattern trials on cholesterol and cardiometabolic risk factors.

Objective: The investigators will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of a Portfolio Dietary Pattern compared to control on lipids and other cardiometabolic risk factors in controlled clinical trials.

Design: The systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched using appropriate search terms supplemented by hand searches of references of included studies. Authors will be contacted for applicable missing data.

Study selection: The investigators will include controlled dietary trials. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials will be included if they are \>= 4 weeks duration and assess the effect of the Portfolio Dietary Pattern on cholesterol and cardiometabolic risk factors compared to a control diet.

Data extraction: Two or more investigators will independently extract relevant data and assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. All disagreements will be resolved by consensus. Standard computations and imputations will be used to derive missing variance data.

Outcomes: The primary outcome of the systematic review and meta-analysis will be the established lipid target for cardiovascular risk reduction, LDL-C. Secondary outcomes will include other blood lipids (total-C, triglycerides, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B (apo B)), adiposity (body weight), inflammation (C-reactive protein), blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP)), glycemic control (HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, fasting blood insulin), and the Framingham risk score for the estimation of 10 year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk.

Data synthesis: Mean differences and standardized mean differences will be pooled for the outcomes noted using the generic inverse variance method. Random-effects models will be used even in the absence of statistically significant between-study heterogeneity, as they yield more conservative summary effect estimates in the presence of residual heterogeneity. Fixed-effects models will be considered where there are \<5 included studies and large precise trials are being combined with smaller imprecise trials. Paired analyses will be applied for crossover trials. Heterogeneity will be assessed by the Cochran Q statistic and quantified by the I2 statistic. To explore sources of heterogeneity, the investigators will conduct sensitivity analyses, in which each study is systematically removed. A sensitivity analysis will also be conducted comparing trials where food was provided with trials where participants received dietary advice, but not provided food. If there are \>=10 studies, then the investigators will also explore sources of heterogeneity by a priori subgroup analyses by age (children \[=\<18 years of age\], adults), health status (metabolic syndrome/diabetes, overweight, normal weight), comparator, baseline measurements, randomization, study design (parallel, crossover), follow-up (=\<8-weeks, \>8-weeks), and risk of bias. Meta-regression analyses will assess the significance of categorical and continuous subgroups analyses. When \>=10 studies are available, publication bias will be investigated by inspection of funnel plots and formal testing using the Egger and Begg tests. If publication bias is suspected, then the investigators will attempt to adjust for funnel plot asymmetry by imputing the missing study data using the Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method.

Evidence Assessment: The strength of the evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Knowledge translation plan: The results will be disseminated through interactive presentations at local, national, and international scientific meetings and publication in high impact factor journals. Target audiences will include the public health and scientific communities with interest in nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Feedback will be incorporated and used to improve the public health message and key areas for future research will be defined. Applicant/Co-applicant Decision Makers will network among opinion leaders to increase awareness and participate directly as committee members in the development of future guidelines.

Significance: The proposed project will aid in knowledge translation related to the role of the Portfolio Dietary Pattern in cholesterol-lowering and cardiometabolic risk, strengthening the evidence-base for guidelines and improving health outcomes by educating healthcare providers and patients, stimulating industry innovation, and guiding future research design.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Risk Factor Cholesterol; Lipidosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

A Portfolio Dietary Pattern involving a combination of 4 cholesterol lowering foods, namely: plant sterols, viscous fibre, plant protein, and nuts.

Portfolio Dietary Pattern

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Portfolio Dietary Pattern consisting of 4 food components, including:

1. plant sterols (sterol-enriched margarine or supplement)
2. viscous soluble fibres (oats, barley, psyllium, eggplant, okra, etc)
3. plant protein (soy products and pulses), and
4. nuts (tree nuts and peanuts)

NCEP Based Diet

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

A low saturated fat, low cholesterol diet.

Control

A National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) based diet, a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol.

NCEP Based Diet

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

A low saturated fat, low cholesterol diet.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Portfolio Dietary Pattern

Portfolio Dietary Pattern consisting of 4 food components, including:

1. plant sterols (sterol-enriched margarine or supplement)
2. viscous soluble fibres (oats, barley, psyllium, eggplant, okra, etc)
3. plant protein (soy products and pulses), and
4. nuts (tree nuts and peanuts)

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

NCEP Based Diet

A low saturated fat, low cholesterol diet.

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dietary Portfolio Portfolio Diet

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Trials in humans
* Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials
* Assessment of the portfolio dietary pattern in comparison to caloric- and macronutrient-matched diets that were not intended to provide components of the portfolio dietary pattern
* Diet duration ≥ 4 week
* Viable outcome data with ≥ 1 outcome of interest

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-human trials
* Observational studies
* Lack of suitable comparator diet
* Diet duration \<4 weeks
* No viable outcome data
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John Sievenpiper

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Sievenpiper, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Toronto 3D (Diet, Digestive tract and Disease) Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Micheal's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Marchie A, Faulkner D, Vidgen E, Lapsley KG, Trautwein EA, Parker TL, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Connelly PW. The effect of combining plant sterols, soy protein, viscous fibers, and almonds in treating hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism. 2003 Nov;52(11):1478-83. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(03)00260-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14624410 (View on PubMed)

Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Marchie A, Faulkner DA, Wong JM, de Souza R, Emam A, Parker TL, Vidgen E, Lapsley KG, Trautwein EA, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Connelly PW. Effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods vs lovastatin on serum lipids and C-reactive protein. JAMA. 2003 Jul 23;290(4):502-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.4.502.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12876093 (View on PubMed)

Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Faulkner DA, Nguyen T, Kemp T, Marchie A, Wong JM, de Souza R, Emam A, Vidgen E, Trautwein EA, Lapsley KG, Holmes C, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Connelly PW, Singer W. Assessment of the longer-term effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods in hypercholesterolemia. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;83(3):582-91. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.83.3.582.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16522904 (View on PubMed)

Jenkins DJ, Jones PJ, Lamarche B, Kendall CW, Faulkner D, Cermakova L, Gigleux I, Ramprasath V, de Souza R, Ireland C, Patel D, Srichaikul K, Abdulnour S, Bashyam B, Collier C, Hoshizaki S, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Connelly PW, Frohlich J. Effect of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods given at 2 levels of intensity of dietary advice on serum lipids in hyperlipidemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011 Aug 24;306(8):831-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1202.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21862744 (View on PubMed)

Jenkins DJ, Chiavaroli L, Wong JM, Kendall C, Lewis GF, Vidgen E, Connelly PW, Leiter LA, Josse RG, Lamarche B. Adding monounsaturated fatty acids to a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods in hypercholesterolemia. CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):1961-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092128. Epub 2010 Nov 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21041432 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DNSG-Portfolio diet

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.