Efficacy of a Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Virtual Reality Intervention

NCT ID: NCT03528018

Last Updated: 2018-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-01

Study Completion Date

2016-09-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rehabilitation options for stroke survivors who present severe hemiparesis in chronic stages are limited and may end in compensation techniques that involve the use of the less affected arm to achieve some degree of functional independence. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique that has been used after stroke to promote excitability of the surviving neural architecture in order to support functional recovery. Interestingly, cortical excitability has been reported to increase when tDCS is combined with virtual reality. This synergetic effect could explain the promising results achieved by preliminary experimental interventions that combined both approaches on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. The objective of this study is to explore the use of these interventions in subjects with severe hemiparesis and to determine its efficacy in comparison to conventional physical therapy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Hemiparesis Chronic Stroke Upper Limb Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Conventional physical therapy

Group Type OTHER

Physical therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical therapy included passive and active mobilization of the paretic upper limb. Passive range of motion exercises were provided in those segments where no active movement was detected to meticulously reproduce a range of articular movements and muscle and soft tissue elongation. In case of residual active movement capability, participants were encouraged to perform the movements with the assistance of the therapists

Experimental

Combined tDCS and VR-based intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REACt system

Intervention Type DEVICE

The REACt system is a virtual reality-based paradigm for upper limb rehabilitation that allows for interaction of individuals with restricted movements from active responses triggered when they attempt to perform a movement. The experimental system also provides multisensory stimulation in the visual, auditory, and tactile channels, and transcranial direct current stimulation coherent to the observed movements

Physical therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical therapy included passive and active mobilization of the paretic upper limb. Passive range of motion exercises were provided in those segments where no active movement was detected to meticulously reproduce a range of articular movements and muscle and soft tissue elongation. In case of residual active movement capability, participants were encouraged to perform the movements with the assistance of the therapists

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

REACt system

The REACt system is a virtual reality-based paradigm for upper limb rehabilitation that allows for interaction of individuals with restricted movements from active responses triggered when they attempt to perform a movement. The experimental system also provides multisensory stimulation in the visual, auditory, and tactile channels, and transcranial direct current stimulation coherent to the observed movements

Intervention Type DEVICE

Physical therapy

Physical therapy included passive and active mobilization of the paretic upper limb. Passive range of motion exercises were provided in those segments where no active movement was detected to meticulously reproduce a range of articular movements and muscle and soft tissue elongation. In case of residual active movement capability, participants were encouraged to perform the movements with the assistance of the therapists

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* chronicity \> six months
* severe paresis of the upper limb defined by the Brunnstrom Approach as stages I or II and by the Upper Extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment as scores below 19
* ability to maintain a sitting position for at least 60 minutes
* fairly good cognitive condition defined by scores in the Mini-Mental State Examination above 23.

Exclusion Criteria

* pacemakers
* brain implants or other metallic objects (valves, coils, etc.)
* impaired comprehension that hinder sufficient understanding of the instructions defined by Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test scores below 45
* severe visual impairments
* emotional or behavioral circumstances that impede adequate collaboration
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitat Politècnica de València

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospitales Nisa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roberto Llorens, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitat Politècnica de València

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Servicio de Neurorrehabilitación y Daño Cerebral de los Hospitales NISA

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TIN2014-61975-EXP

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BES-2014-068218

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NISA-PHYS-2016/1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.