The Comparison of Granulosa Cell Apoptosis Rates With or Without Luteinizing Hormone Administration in Poor Responders.
NCT ID: NCT03527823
Last Updated: 2020-06-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
31 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-10-17
2019-01-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
n the present study, the follicle aspiration fluid is planned to be used with the patient's permission. The investigators are going to examine the granulosa cell apoptosis rate by using annexin-5 antibody in both groups 1 (LH added) and 2 (without LH).
For this purpose, a total of 40 volunteer patients are planned to involve, the groups are designed as 20 LH added and 20 LH added women.
In the present study, the investigators hypothesis that the rates of granulosa cell apoptosis in poor responders may be different between the group 1 (with LH) and group 2 (without LH), this will lead to IVF therapy in the near future.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oestradiol Pre-treatment in an Ultrashort Flare GnRH Agonist/GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Undergoing IVF
NCT01798836
Outcome of Three Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Protocols in Poor Responding Infertility Patients
NCT02293668
Ovarian Stimulation With FSH Alone Versus FSH Plus GnRH Antagonist in an Oocyte Donor/Recipient Programme
NCT05759871
Luteal Phase Commencing of Growth Hormone
NCT00561769
Monitoring the Early Follicular Phase With Androstenedione in Low-dose Step-up Ovulation Induction in High Responders
NCT02329483
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In recent years, studies have been done to investigate the utility of the addition of LH as well as FSH to the cycle outcome. In a Cochrane review, the combination of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (r-FSH) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (r-LH) administration in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF / ICSI) cycles compared to only r-FSH cycles in 14 randomized controlled trials \[4\]. When r-LH was added, there was no statistical difference in terms of pregnancy outcomes. However, due to the small size of the work, the net result was not achieved. The other study supported the treatment of rFSH alone, while the addition of r-LH was found to be beneficial only in one of the studies \[5, 6\] . As a result, there is no significant difference in live birth rates.
However, the studies in only poor responders showed a significant increase in pregnancy rates with the addition of r-LH \[5, 7\]. In contrast, recently Bosch et al. reported that the addition of r-LH in the 36-39 age group of patients with GnRH antagonist protocol benefit from LH support, while patients under the age of 36 do not \[8\]. In conclusion, there is no consensus to administrate r-LH to the protocols of poor responders. Our hypothesis is LH administration may decrease granulosa apoptosis rate in follicular fluids and may be beneficial to poor responders and over age of 35.
In Zeynep Kamil Women and Children's Education and Research Hospital where the data of study patients is going to be collected, the investigators are applying microdose flare-up GNRH analogue or GNRH antagonist protocol to the poor responders. The investigators may or may not supplement LH. hCG is performed when at least 2 follicles are 17 mm and the serum estradiol level is above 500 pg / ml. 36 hours after hCG, ovarian aspiration is performed by the guidance of transvaginal ultrasound. Normally after oocyte separation process, the remaining follicle aspiration fluid is destroyed.
The follicle aspiration fluid is planned to be used within the permission of the patient in the present study. The investigators are going to examine the granulosa cell apoptosis rate with using annexin-5 antibody in group 1 (LH added) and group 2 (without LH).
For this purpose, a total of 40 volunteer patients are planned to have 20 LH added and 20 LH added patient groups.
Statistical analysis is going to be performed using SPSS 11 program. p \<0.05 will be considered significant.
In the present study, the investigators hypothesis that comparing the rates of granulosa cell apoptosis in poor responders as two different groups (with and without addition of LH) will lead to IVF therapy in the near future.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LH supplementation
luteinizing hormone administrated microdose flare up GnRH analog protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.
No interventions assigned to this group
without LH supplementation
microdose flare up GnRH analog protocol in poor ovarian responders
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* poor ovarian responders
* undergoing treatment for primary/secondary infertility
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
49 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Giresun University Funding for Scientific Research Project
UNKNOWN
Sebnem Alanya Tosun
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sebnem Alanya Tosun
Assistant Professor- Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
enis ozkaya
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
zeynep kamil education and research hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sebnem Alanya Tosun
Giresun, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bosch E, Labarta E, Crespo J, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Impact of luteinizing hormone administration on gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: an age-adjusted analysis. Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):1031-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.021. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Magli MC, D'angelo A, Farfalli V, Montanaro N. Exogenous luteinizing hormone in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction techniques. Fertil Steril. 2004 Dec;82(6):1521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.041.
Kaleli S, Yanikkaya-Demirel G, Erel CT, Senturk LM, Topcuoglu A, Irez T. High rate of aneuploidy in luteinized granulosa cells obtained from follicular fluid in women who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril. 2005 Sep;84(3):802-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.040.
Sullivan MW, Stewart-Akers A, Krasnow JS, Berga SL, Zeleznik AJ. Ovarian responses in women to recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone (LH): a role for LH in the final stages of follicular maturation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Jan;84(1):228-32. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.1.5389.
Filicori M, Cognigni GE, Samara A, Melappioni S, Perri T, Cantelli B, Parmegiani L, Pelusi G, DeAloysio D. The use of LH activity to drive folliculogenesis: exploring uncharted territories in ovulation induction. Hum Reprod Update. 2002 Nov-Dec;8(6):543-57. doi: 10.1093/humupd/8.6.543.
Balasch J, Vidal E, Penarrubia J, Casamitjana R, Carmona F, Creus M, Fabregues F, Vanrell JA. Suppression of LH during ovarian stimulation: analysing threshold values and effects on ovarian response and the outcome of assisted reproduction in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH. Hum Reprod. 2001 Aug;16(8):1636-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1636.
Mochtar MH, Van der Veen, Ziech M, van Wely M. Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone (rLH) for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD005070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005070.pub2.
Tarlatzis B, Tavmergen E, Szamatowicz M, Barash A, Amit A, Levitas E, Shoham Z. The use of recombinant human LH (lutropin alfa) in the late stimulation phase of assisted reproduction cycles: a double-blind, randomized, prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2006 Jan;21(1):90-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei293. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
De Placido G, Alviggi C, Perino A, Strina I, Lisi F, Fasolino A, De Palo R, Ranieri A, Colacurci N, Mollo A; Italian Collaborative Group on Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone. Recombinant human LH supplementation versus recombinant human FSH (rFSH) step-up protocol during controlled ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women with initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH. A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2005 Feb;20(2):390-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh625. Epub 2004 Dec 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
123
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GranulosaApoptosis
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.