rFSH vs rFSH+rLH in Dydrogesterone-Based Progestin Protocol: A Prospective Study

NCT ID: NCT07348757

Last Updated: 2026-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-05-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to compare two commonly used hormone treatments for women undergoing IVF. All participants will receive a stimulation protocol that includes dydrogesterone, a medication used to safely control natural hormone surges during treatment. The study will observe women who are treated either with recombinant FSH alone or with a combination of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH-both routinely used options in our clinic.

Investigators will prospectively monitor how these treatments affect the growth of ovarian follicles, the number of mature eggs collected, the quality of developing embryos, and early pregnancy outcomes. No additional procedures or medications will be required beyond standard IVF care. The goal is to better understand whether adding recombinant LH provides any measurable benefit in dydrogesterone-based PPOS cycles.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate how two routinely used gonadotropin strategies influence ovarian response and reproductive outcomes in women undergoing IVF treatment with a dydrogesterone-based Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) protocol. In standard clinical practice, ovarian stimulation may be performed using recombinant FSH alone or a combination of recombinant FSH and recombinant LH. Both approaches are already used in daily care, and the choice of regimen is determined by the treating physician according to individual patient characteristics. The study does not assign treatments; instead, it observes and compares outcomes in patients receiving these medications as part of routine management.

Dydrogesterone is administered from Day 2 of the cycle to prevent premature LH surges, allowing controlled follicular growth. Participants will undergo regular ultrasound monitoring and bloodwork as part of their usual IVF treatment. When appropriate follicular maturation is achieved, final oocyte maturation will be triggered, followed by oocyte retrieval according to standard clinical protocols.

The primary focus of this study is to compare the number of mature (MII) oocytes obtained between the two gonadotropin regimens. Secondary outcomes include the number of good-quality blastocysts, implantation rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate, which together provide a comprehensive assessment of IVF success. Additional stimulation characteristics-such as follicle growth patterns, estradiol and LH levels, total gonadotropin dose, and duration of stimulation-will also be documented to explore differences in cycle dynamics.

No extra medications, procedures, or interventions will be required beyond routine IVF care. All data will be collected prospectively and analyzed to determine whether adding recombinant LH offers measurable clinical advantages compared with recombinant FSH alone in dydrogesterone-PPOS cycles.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

InVitro Fertilization Gonadotropins

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Recombinant FSH Only Group

Recombinant FSH (rFSH) Group - Additional Information

Participants in this cohort will undergo ovarian stimulation using recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) alone, following routine IVF clinical practice. Dydrogesterone will be initiated on Cycle Day 2 as part of the standard PPOS (Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation) protocol to prevent premature LH surge. Follicular development will be monitored with ultrasound and serum hormone levels, and the timing of final oocyte maturation and oocyte pick-up will follow standard clinical procedures. No additional medications or interventions will be administered beyond those routinely used for IVF treatment.

No interventions assigned to this group

Recombinant FSH Plus Recombinant LH Group

Recombinant FSH Plus Recombinant LH (2:1 Combination) Group - Additional Information

Participants in this cohort will receive a combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) in a fixed 2:1 ratio, as routinely used in clinical IVF practice. Dydrogesterone will be initiated on Cycle Day 2 according to the standard PPOS (Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation) protocol to prevent premature LH surge. Follicular development will be monitored through ultrasound examinations and serum hormone measurements, and final oocyte maturation and oocyte retrieval will be performed following standard clinical procedures. No additional treatments or study-specific interventions will be administered beyond those normally used in IVF care.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women aged 20 to 43 years.
* BMI \< 30 kg/m².
* AMH \> 1 ng/mL.
* Undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment with a dydrogesterone-based PPOS protocol.
* Women with regular menstrual cycles or clinically acceptable cycle pattern for stimulation.
* Ability to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures.
* Presence of at least one ovary and eligibility for controlled ovarian stimulation

Exclusion Criteria

* Cycle cancellation due to lack of viable embryos.
* Prior or planned PGT-A in the same cycle.
* Adenomyosis diagnosed by ultrasound or MRI.
* Uncorrected uterine anomalies (e.g., bicornuate, unicornuate, didelphys uterus).
* Presence of hydrosalpinx.
* Use of oral contraceptives or luteal-phase estradiol within 3 months before stimulation.
* Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
* Severe systemic disease or contraindication to ovarian stimulation.
* Prior bilateral oophorectomy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

43 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centrum Clinic IVF Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Emre Göksan Pabuçcu

Prof. Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centrum Clinic IVF Center

Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Emre G pabuçcu, Professor

Role: CONTACT

+905324147844

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Emre G Pabuccu, Prof.

Role: primary

05324147844

Recai Pabuccu, Prof.

Role: backup

0090 532 6160086

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Muharam R, Nurdya AN, Yo EC, Sumapraja K, Harzif AK, Maidarti M, Wiweko B, Hestiantoro A. Comparing Dydrogesterone Versus Medroxyprogesterone in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) for Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2025 Jun 13;17(6):e85959. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85959. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40524846 (View on PubMed)

Zhang J, Du M, Li Z, Liu W, Ren B, Zhang Y, Guan Y. Comparison of Dydrogesterone and Medroxyprogesterone in the Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol for Patients With Poor Ovarian Response. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 24;12:708704. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.708704. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34630325 (View on PubMed)

Yu S, Long H, Chang HY, Liu Y, Gao H, Zhu J, Quan X, Lyu Q, Kuang Y, Ai A. New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):229-237. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex367.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29300975 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025-11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.