Comparison of 3 Different Protocols for Preventing Premature Ovulation in Ovarian Stimulation Cycles

NCT ID: NCT05767086

Last Updated: 2024-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

297 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-15

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of study is to evaluate the results of three different protocols for prevention of premature ovulation in ovarian stimulation cycles. All patients that undergo IVF cycles are randomly divided into three groups. The first group is cetrorelix, the second group is medroxyprogesterone acetate and the third group is dydrogesterone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approximately %10-15 of couples of reproductive age have infertility issues. Ovulation induction and in vitro fertilization (IVF) are the main treatments for infertility. With ovarian stimulation (OS), the efficiency of IVF has been increased by collecting more than one oocytes and thus providing more embryos. Multifollicular growth in OS may cause an increase in sex steroids and an early LH peak, thus premature ovulation. Pituitary suppression with certain drugs has been used to prevent premature ovulation.. Among these drugs, it has been observed that GnRH agonists can cause down-regulation, hypo-estrogenic symptoms, ovarian cyst formation and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS), while antagonists may have side effects such as low oocyte count and high cycle cancellation. The use of progesterone preparations as an alternative to these drugs recently gained ground.

Data including age, BMI, the duration of infertility, the type of infertility, antral follicle count, serum day 3 FSH level, Serum anti-Müllerian hormone level, total gonadotropin dose, stimulation time, pituitary suppression starting day, duration of pituitary suppression, premature ovulation, number of total oocyte count, the number of total M2, the number of PN , the number of Day 5 blast, number of transferred embryos, endometrial thickness on the day of transfer will be recorded. When the follicle size reaches 13-14 mm, patients will be randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 (Cetrorelix: n=99, 0.25 mg/day subcutaneously), Group 2 (Medroxyprogesterone Acetate: n=99, 2x5mg/day orally) and Group 3 (Dydrogesterone: n=99, 3x10 mg/day orally). Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) will be used for trigger when at least 2 follicles' diameter reaches 17-18mm for ovulation. Thirty-six hours after the hCG injection, the patient's oocytes will be collected. During 2-5 days of embryo culture, embryo quality will be determined according to D.Gardner criteria (1999). Embryos will be frozen as blast on the 5th day and transferred to the frozen cycle to be planned within the next month. Clinical pregnancy rates will be recorded by performing a blood test for on the 12th day after the procedure.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of three different protocols for prevention of premature ovulation in ovarian stimulation cycles. All patients undergo IVF cycles are randomly divided in to three groups. The first group is cetrorelix, the second group is medroxyprogesterone acetate and the third group is dydrogesterone.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist

Cetrotide® (0.25 mg, MerckSerono Pharmaceuticals, Darmstadt, Germany)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrotide)

Intervention Type DRUG

clinical pregnancy rates

Medroxyprogesterone acetate

Tarlusal® (5 mg, Deva Pharma, Istanbul, Turkey)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (Tarlusal)

Intervention Type DRUG

clinical pregnancy rates

Dydrogesterone

Duphaston® (10mg, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois, ABD)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dydrogesterone

Intervention Type DRUG

clinical pregnancy rates

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrotide)

clinical pregnancy rates

Intervention Type DRUG

Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (Tarlusal)

clinical pregnancy rates

Intervention Type DRUG

Dydrogesterone

clinical pregnancy rates

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cetrotide Tarlusal Duphaston (Duphaston)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women aged 20-38 years who applied to the infertility clinic
* BMI\<25 kg/m2
* AMH\>1 ng/mL

Exclusion Criteria

* Adenomyosis
* Endometriosis
* Untreated uterine pathology
* Hormonal therapy in the last 3 months
* Contraindication for ovulation stimulation
* BMI\>25 kg/m2
* AMH\<1 ng/mL
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

38 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bezmialem Vakif University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bezmialem Vakif University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ata B, Capuzzo M, Turkgeldi E, Yildiz S, La Marca A. Progestins for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for ART: a comprehensive and systematic review including meta-analyses. Hum Reprod Update. 2021 Jan 4;27(1):48-66. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa040.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33016316 (View on PubMed)

Yildiz S, Turkgeldi E, Angun B, Eraslan A, Urman B, Ata B. Comparison of a novel flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol and the flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol for assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2019 Oct;112(4):677-683. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31371053 (View on PubMed)

Alexandru P, Cekic SG, Yildiz S, Turkgeldi E, Ata B. Progestins versus GnRH analogues for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jun;40(6):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32327297 (View on PubMed)

Yang L, Luo K, Lu G, Lin G, Gong F. Euploidy rates among preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles with oral dydrogesterone primed ovarian stimulation or GnRH antagonist protocol. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Oct;45(4):721-726. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.003. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35989167 (View on PubMed)

La Marca A, Capuzzo M, Sacchi S, Imbrogno MG, Spinella F, Varricchio MT, Minasi MG, Greco P, Fiorentino F, Greco E. Comparison of euploidy rates of blastocysts in women treated with progestins or GnRH antagonist to prevent the luteinizing hormone surge during ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun 1;35(6):1325-1331. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa068.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32395749 (View on PubMed)

Begueria R, Garcia D, Vassena R, Rodriguez A. Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez034.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30927417 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

30.01.2023-E.94828

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.