Comparison of 3 Different Protocols for Preventing Premature Ovulation in Ovarian Stimulation Cycles
NCT ID: NCT05767086
Last Updated: 2024-10-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
297 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-03-15
2024-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
rFSH vs rFSH+rLH in Dydrogesterone-Based Progestin Protocol: A Prospective Study
NCT07348757
The Effect of GnRH Agonist Administered in the Luteal Phase on ART Cycle Outcomes
NCT02114645
Dydrogesterone, Cetrorelix Acetate and Triptorelin in Intra Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes
NCT05972902
Comparison of Recombinant Follicle Stimulating Hormone and the Combination of Recombinant Follicle Stimulating Hormone With Clomiphene Citrate in Stimulated Intrauterine Insemination Cycles
NCT05670795
Outcome of Three Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Protocols in Poor Responding Infertility Patients
NCT02293668
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data including age, BMI, the duration of infertility, the type of infertility, antral follicle count, serum day 3 FSH level, Serum anti-Müllerian hormone level, total gonadotropin dose, stimulation time, pituitary suppression starting day, duration of pituitary suppression, premature ovulation, number of total oocyte count, the number of total M2, the number of PN , the number of Day 5 blast, number of transferred embryos, endometrial thickness on the day of transfer will be recorded. When the follicle size reaches 13-14 mm, patients will be randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 (Cetrorelix: n=99, 0.25 mg/day subcutaneously), Group 2 (Medroxyprogesterone Acetate: n=99, 2x5mg/day orally) and Group 3 (Dydrogesterone: n=99, 3x10 mg/day orally). Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) will be used for trigger when at least 2 follicles' diameter reaches 17-18mm for ovulation. Thirty-six hours after the hCG injection, the patient's oocytes will be collected. During 2-5 days of embryo culture, embryo quality will be determined according to D.Gardner criteria (1999). Embryos will be frozen as blast on the 5th day and transferred to the frozen cycle to be planned within the next month. Clinical pregnancy rates will be recorded by performing a blood test for on the 12th day after the procedure.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of three different protocols for prevention of premature ovulation in ovarian stimulation cycles. All patients undergo IVF cycles are randomly divided in to three groups. The first group is cetrorelix, the second group is medroxyprogesterone acetate and the third group is dydrogesterone.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist
Cetrotide® (0.25 mg, MerckSerono Pharmaceuticals, Darmstadt, Germany)
Gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrotide)
clinical pregnancy rates
Medroxyprogesterone acetate
Tarlusal® (5 mg, Deva Pharma, Istanbul, Turkey)
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (Tarlusal)
clinical pregnancy rates
Dydrogesterone
Duphaston® (10mg, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois, ABD)
Dydrogesterone
clinical pregnancy rates
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrotide)
clinical pregnancy rates
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (Tarlusal)
clinical pregnancy rates
Dydrogesterone
clinical pregnancy rates
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI\<25 kg/m2
* AMH\>1 ng/mL
Exclusion Criteria
* Endometriosis
* Untreated uterine pathology
* Hormonal therapy in the last 3 months
* Contraindication for ovulation stimulation
* BMI\>25 kg/m2
* AMH\<1 ng/mL
20 Years
38 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bezmialem Vakif University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bezmialem Vakif University
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ata B, Capuzzo M, Turkgeldi E, Yildiz S, La Marca A. Progestins for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for ART: a comprehensive and systematic review including meta-analyses. Hum Reprod Update. 2021 Jan 4;27(1):48-66. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa040.
Yildiz S, Turkgeldi E, Angun B, Eraslan A, Urman B, Ata B. Comparison of a novel flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol and the flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol for assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2019 Oct;112(4):677-683. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Alexandru P, Cekic SG, Yildiz S, Turkgeldi E, Ata B. Progestins versus GnRH analogues for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jun;40(6):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
Yang L, Luo K, Lu G, Lin G, Gong F. Euploidy rates among preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles with oral dydrogesterone primed ovarian stimulation or GnRH antagonist protocol. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Oct;45(4):721-726. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.003. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
La Marca A, Capuzzo M, Sacchi S, Imbrogno MG, Spinella F, Varricchio MT, Minasi MG, Greco P, Fiorentino F, Greco E. Comparison of euploidy rates of blastocysts in women treated with progestins or GnRH antagonist to prevent the luteinizing hormone surge during ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun 1;35(6):1325-1331. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa068.
Begueria R, Garcia D, Vassena R, Rodriguez A. Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez034.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
30.01.2023-E.94828
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.