Comparison of the Effect of Subcutaneous Progesterone and Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support
NCT ID: NCT05276531
Last Updated: 2022-09-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
146 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-01
2022-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Subcutaneous Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Gel for Luteal Phase Support
NCT02316626
Patients' Preference for Subcutaneous or Vaginal Progesterone as Luteal Support in IVF/ICSI Cycles
NCT03181685
Subcutaneous Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Gel for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
NCT00827983
Patient's Preferences About Subcutaneous or Vaginal Progesterone Administration for Luteal Phase Support
NCT03734770
Oral Versus Vaginal Progesterone in the Luteal Support in Cryo-warmed Embryo Transfer Cycles
NCT03619707
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
subcutaneous progesterone
PROLUTEX® 25 mg Solution for injection, IBSA Group, Lugano, Switzerland
subcutaneous progesterone
clinical pregnancy rates
vaginal progesterone
LUTINUS® 100 mg vaginal tablets, Ferring GmbH Wittland/Kiel/Germany
vaginal progesterone
clinical pregnancy rates
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
subcutaneous progesterone
clinical pregnancy rates
vaginal progesterone
clinical pregnancy rates
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Endometrial thickness less than 5 mm
* Patients with FSH\<10 IU/ml, E2\<60-80 pg/ml in the blood hormone test performed on the third day of the cycle and patients with antral follicle count above 7 on ultrasound
* Total motile sperm count greater than 10 million/ml
* 18-40 years old female, 18-50 years old male
* Anovulation, patients diagnosed with unexplained mild male factor infertility
* Female partners, who's BMI\<25 kg/m²
* Being voluntarily
Exclusion Criteria
* The patients who doesn't meet the criterias
* Refusing to attend to the research
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bezmialem Vakif University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gurkan Kiran, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Bezmialem Vakif University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bezmialem Vakif University
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Erdem A, Erdem M, Atmaca S, Guler I. Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.029. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
Oktem M, Altinkaya SO, Yilmaz SA, Bozkurt N, Erdem M, Erdem A, Gumuslu S. Effect of luteal phase support after ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(12):909-12. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.947567. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
Maher MA. Luteal phase support may improve pregnancy outcomes during intrauterine insemination cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Jul;157(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.022. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
Ozcan P, Takmaz T. Identification of predictive factors for the probability of pregnancy following ovulation stimulation-intra-uterine insemination cycles in terms of female and male. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Mar;47(3):893-899. doi: 10.1111/jog.14594. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
Keskin M, Aytac R. Does Luteal Phase Support Effect Pregnancy Rates in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles? A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study in a Tertiary Center. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2020 Aug 5;2020:6234070. doi: 10.1155/2020/6234070. eCollection 2020.
Khosravi D, Taheripanah R, Taheripanah A, Tarighat Monfared V, Hosseini-Zijoud SM. Comparison of oral dydrogesterone with vaginal progesteronefor luteal support in IUI cycles: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015 Jul;13(7):433-8.
Green KA, Zolton JR, Schermerhorn SM, Lewis TD, Healy MW, Terry N, DeCherney AH, Hill MJ. Progesterone luteal support after ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):924-933.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18.10.2021-E.36477
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.