Subcutaneous Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Tablets for Luteal Phase Support in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
NCT ID: NCT00828191
Last Updated: 2013-01-31
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
800 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-12-31
2012-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Subcutaneous Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Gel for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
NCT00827983
Patients' Preference for Subcutaneous or Vaginal Progesterone as Luteal Support in IVF/ICSI Cycles
NCT03181685
Subcutaneous Progesterone in Frozen- Thawed Single Euploid Blastocyst Transfer.
NCT04549116
Vaginal Versus Combined Use of Progesterone in Fresh IVF/ICSI Cycles
NCT05089383
Patient's Preferences About Subcutaneous or Vaginal Progesterone Administration for Luteal Phase Support
NCT03734770
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Progesterone SC
Progesterone
25 mg, once a day, SC
Progesterone Tablets
Progesterone
100 mg, twice a day, vaginally
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Progesterone
25 mg, once a day, SC
Progesterone
100 mg, twice a day, vaginally
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI \< 30 kg/m2;
* Age 18 - 42 (upon starting COH);
* \<3 prior ART cycles (IVF, ICSI and related procedures);
* Baseline (day 2-3 of cycling) FSH \<15 IU/L and E2 \<80 pg/mL;
* Normal uterine cavity as per recent hysterosalpingogram, sonohysterogram or hysteroscopic exam (i.e. no polyps or protruding submucosal fibroids);
* Patients must have at least three retrieved oocytes.
Exclusion Criteria
* Stage III or IV endometriosis (no endometriomas);
* Hydrosalpinges;
* History of past poor response to COH resulting in canceling ART;
* Use of thawed/donated oocytes;
* Use of thawed/donated embryos;
* Gestational carrier;
* Patients affected by pathologies associated with any contraindication of being pregnant;
* Hypersensitivity to study medication;
* Uncontrolled adrenal or thyroid dysfunction;
* History of conditions (i.e. toxic shock syndrome) that would contraindicate use of a vaginal progesterone product;
* History of arterial disease;
* Patients with hepatic impairment (liver function tests \> 2x upper limits of normal);
* Patients with dermatologic disease;
* Patients with renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2);
* Neoplasias (current) or history of neoplasia that may be responsive to progesterone;
* High grade cervical dysplasia;
* History of recurrent pregnancy loss defined as 3 or more spontaneous miscarriages, wherein pregnancy developed to a minimum of a gestational sac on TVUS;
* Participation in a concurrent clinical trial or in another trial within the past 2 months;
* Use of concomitant medications that might interfere with the study evaluation;
* Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis/screening
18 Years
42 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IBSA Institut Biochimique SA
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Reproductive Partners Medical Group, Inc.
Redondo Beach, California, United States
Fertility Physicians of Northern California
San Jose, California, United States
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, United States
Fertility and Surgical Associates of California
Thousand Oaks, California, United States
Center for Reproductive Medicine
Orlando, Florida, United States
Idaho Center for Reproductive Medicine
Boise, Idaho, United States
Center for Assisted Reproduction
Bedford, Texas, United States
Seattle Reproductive Medicine
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Griesinger G, Trevisan S, Cometti B. Endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer is a poor predictor of IVF treatment outcome. Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Jan 29;2018(1):hox031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox031. eCollection 2018.
Baker VL, Jones CA, Doody K, Foulk R, Yee B, Adamson GD, Cometti B, DeVane G, Hubert G, Trevisan S, Hoehler F, Jones C, Soules M. A randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone with vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support of in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2212-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu194. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
07USA/Prg05
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.