Subcutaneous Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Tablets for Luteal Phase Support in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

NCT ID: NCT00828191

Last Updated: 2013-01-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

800 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-12-31

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective, open, randomized, parallel, multicenter, two-arm trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new progesterone formulation to be used for luteal support in IVF (Progesterone-IBSA) administered subcutaneously at a daily dose of 25 mg versus Progesterone tablets administered intravaginally at 100 mg twice daily for a total dose of 200 mg.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

In Vitro Fertilization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Progesterone SC

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Progesterone

Intervention Type DRUG

25 mg, once a day, SC

Progesterone Tablets

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Progesterone

Intervention Type DRUG

100 mg, twice a day, vaginally

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Progesterone

25 mg, once a day, SC

Intervention Type DRUG

Progesterone

100 mg, twice a day, vaginally

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient has given written informed consent;
* BMI \< 30 kg/m2;
* Age 18 - 42 (upon starting COH);
* \<3 prior ART cycles (IVF, ICSI and related procedures);
* Baseline (day 2-3 of cycling) FSH \<15 IU/L and E2 \<80 pg/mL;
* Normal uterine cavity as per recent hysterosalpingogram, sonohysterogram or hysteroscopic exam (i.e. no polyps or protruding submucosal fibroids);
* Patients must have at least three retrieved oocytes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Intramural uterine fibroids that distort the uterine cavity or polyps \>1 cm;
* Stage III or IV endometriosis (no endometriomas);
* Hydrosalpinges;
* History of past poor response to COH resulting in canceling ART;
* Use of thawed/donated oocytes;
* Use of thawed/donated embryos;
* Gestational carrier;
* Patients affected by pathologies associated with any contraindication of being pregnant;
* Hypersensitivity to study medication;
* Uncontrolled adrenal or thyroid dysfunction;
* History of conditions (i.e. toxic shock syndrome) that would contraindicate use of a vaginal progesterone product;
* History of arterial disease;
* Patients with hepatic impairment (liver function tests \> 2x upper limits of normal);
* Patients with dermatologic disease;
* Patients with renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2);
* Neoplasias (current) or history of neoplasia that may be responsive to progesterone;
* High grade cervical dysplasia;
* History of recurrent pregnancy loss defined as 3 or more spontaneous miscarriages, wherein pregnancy developed to a minimum of a gestational sac on TVUS;
* Participation in a concurrent clinical trial or in another trial within the past 2 months;
* Use of concomitant medications that might interfere with the study evaluation;
* Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis/screening
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

42 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IBSA Institut Biochimique SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Reproductive Partners Medical Group, Inc.

Redondo Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Fertility Physicians of Northern California

San Jose, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University Medical Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Fertility and Surgical Associates of California

Thousand Oaks, California, United States

Site Status

Center for Reproductive Medicine

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Idaho Center for Reproductive Medicine

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Center for Assisted Reproduction

Bedford, Texas, United States

Site Status

Seattle Reproductive Medicine

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Griesinger G, Trevisan S, Cometti B. Endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer is a poor predictor of IVF treatment outcome. Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Jan 29;2018(1):hox031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox031. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30895243 (View on PubMed)

Baker VL, Jones CA, Doody K, Foulk R, Yee B, Adamson GD, Cometti B, DeVane G, Hubert G, Trevisan S, Hoehler F, Jones C, Soules M. A randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone with vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support of in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2212-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu194. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25100106 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

07USA/Prg05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Progesterone Support of FET
NCT01058382 COMPLETED