Follicular Steroid Genesis in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation

NCT ID: NCT02738580

Last Updated: 2020-03-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

112 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-18

Study Completion Date

2018-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Serum concentrations of the different hormones involved in follicular steroid genesis during a cycle of controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH or HMG will be compared in this study. Serum Progesterone (P) levels at the end of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (i.e. the day of triggering) have been related to cycle outcome, in terms of ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates. Large cohort studies show that P levels above a certain threshold are associated with poorer cycle outcome. The mechanisms behind P elevation are not well understood yet. It has been shown that P levels are positively related to ovarian response and to the dose of FSH given during COS. Furthermore, it has been well documented that P levels at the end of stimulation are significantly higher when recombinant (r) FSH is used for COS when compared to HMG, either in a GnRH agonist long protocol or in a GnRH antagonist protocol. Some authors suggest that this finding is explained by the fact that COS with rFSH provides a higher oocyte yield than when hMG is given, so the higher P levels observed would be explained by the larger number of follicles developed when rFSH is used. On the other hand, other authors explain this event by a different follicular esteroidogenesis when HMG is used for COS compared to rFSH The hypotheisis behind this assumption is that rFSH enhances P synthesis from its precursor pregnenolone in the granulosa cells. This P is unable to be further metabolized into androgens because of the lack of 17-20 lyase in the human granulosa cells, and therefore is delivered into circulation. On the other hand, when HMG is given for COS, the ∆4 pathway is promoted, and pregnenolone will be catabolized in to Dehidroepiandrostenodione (DHEA), in the theca cells, and this one to Androstenodione, which will be finally aromatized in to estrogens. This mechanism will explain the lower P and higher E2 levels observed in HMG cycles in comparison to rFSH cycles.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

rFSH

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and rFSH in women with normal ovarian function.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

COS with GnRH antagonists and rFSH

Intervention Type DRUG

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and rFSH in women with normal ovarian function.

HP-HMG

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG with normal ovarian function.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

COS with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG

Intervention Type DRUG

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG in women with normal ovarian function.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

COS with GnRH antagonists and rFSH

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and rFSH in women with normal ovarian function.

Intervention Type DRUG

COS with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG in women with normal ovarian function.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

GnRH antagonists and rFSH GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Good physical and psychological condition
* Normal menstrual cycle (25-35 days)
* Normal ovarian reserve defined by serum ANH010-30 pMol/L
* All other criteria to fulfill by oocyte donors

Exclusion Criteria

* Kidney failure
* Ovarian Polyquistic syndrome
* Any systemic or metabolic disfunction that counter indicates the use of gonadotrophins
* Any other reason that involves exclusion of the oocyte donation program
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Roche Pharma AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ernesto Bosch, MDPhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IVI VALENCIA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IVI Valencia

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bosch E, Alama P, Romero JL, Mari M, Labarta E, Pellicer A. Serum progesterone is lower in ovarian stimulation with highly purified HMG compared to recombinant FSH owing to a different regulation of follicular steroidogenesis: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2024 Feb 1;39(2):393-402. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead251.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38037188 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1512-VLC-066-EB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.