N680S Polymorphism of the FSHR Gene and Its Relationship With the Type of Gonadotropin Used in COS
NCT ID: NCT04122729
Last Updated: 2019-10-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-09-25
2020-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is a non-interventional, observational, cross-sectional and retrospective, national and multicenter study, in which a genetic test will be carried out to determine the genotype of the N680S polymorphism in samples of blood of patients who have undergone two cycles of controlled ovarian stimulation in the last 8 months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Follicular Steroid Genesis in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation
NCT02738580
Genetic Variation in Gonadotropin and Gonadotropin Receptor Genes and Suboptimal Response
NCT03007043
Ovarian Stimulation With Recombinant Gonadotropins vs. Human Menopausal Gonadotropin in In Vitro Fertilization
NCT02322398
Role of FSHR Polymorphism p.N680S in the Therapy With FSH in Patients Who Underwent Varicocele Surgery
NCT02719093
Efficacy of Ovarian Stimulation Based on FSHR Genotype Status
NCT00749853
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All patients who agree to participate in the study will have a blood sample taken on the same day as a routine extraction performed for the 2nd cycle of the controlled ovarian stimulation in accordance with the standard clinical practice of each hospital. The sample will be sent to the central laboratory to determine the genotype of the afore mentioned polymorphism and correlate it with the clinical results obtained with the two cycles of controlled ovarian stimulation.
In order to avoid any bias, the study population will follow a crossover design with respect to the type of FSH used in the first and second cycles of the COS (i.e., half of the recruited patients must have undergone a first cycle of COS with recombinant FSH and a second cycle with human FSH; and, conversely, the other half must have undergone a first cycle with human FSH and a second cycle with recombinant FSH). In order to avoid potential modifications to the inclusion criteria, the time elapsed between the two cycles should not exceed 6 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≤ 37 years
* BMI \< 30 kg/m2
* Antral follicles count 1st cycle COS = 5-15
* Antimüllerian hormone basal 1st cycle COS \> 1,1 ng/ml and \< 3,1 ng/ml
* COS protocol: equal starting dose in the 2 cycles of COS (150-225 UI/day) with dose adjustment from the 5th day of COS; pituitary suppression protocol in the 2 cycles of COS with GnRH antagonist with onset when ≥ 1 follicle of ≥ 14 mm in diameter or E2 ≤ 600 pg/ml; and triggering with hCGr or GnRH agonist
* Optional the use of oral contraceptives (OC) (however, same in the 2 cycles)
* 4-9 recovered oocytes in the 1st cycle of COS
* ≤ 6 months between the 2 cycles of COS
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of severe male factor
* Grade III-IV endometriosis
* Patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, a history of uterine or ovarian surgeries, hydrosalpinx visible by ultrasound, or uterine fibroids measuring \> 30 mm
* Major systemic or uncontrolled endocrine-metabolic diseases affecting the pituitary gland, the thyroid gland, the adrenal glands, the pancreas, the liver, or the kidneys
18 Years
37 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sistemas Genómicos
UNKNOWN
Angelini Farmacéutica
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
María Carrera, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón
Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Clínic
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
Córdoba, , Spain
Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
Granada, , Spain
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
Valencia, , Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario Valladolid
Valladolid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Berta Mª Martín, PhD
Role: primary
Dolors Manau, PhD
Role: primary
Julio Herrero, PhD
Role: primary
Juan Lorente, PhD
Role: primary
Luis Martínez, PhD
Role: primary
Mª Isabel Calventus, PhD
Role: primary
Miguel Caballero, PhD
Role: primary
Laura de la Fuente, PhD
Role: primary
Sonia Lobo, PhD
Role: primary
Irene Heras, PhD
Role: primary
José Mª Rubio, PhD
Role: primary
Ana Casas, PhD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Trounson AO, Leeton JF, Wood C, Webb J, Wood J. Pregnancies in humans by fertilization in vitro and embryo transfer in the controlled ovulatory cycle. Science. 1981 May 8;212(4495):681-2. doi: 10.1126/science.7221557.
Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1768-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der106. Epub 2011 May 10.
Kligman I, Rosenwaks Z. Differentiating clinical profiles: predicting good responders, poor responders, and hyperresponders. Fertil Steril. 2001 Dec;76(6):1185-90. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02893-x.
Freour T, Masson D, Mirallie S, Jean M, Bach K, Dejoie T, Barriere P. Active smoking compromises IVF outcome and affects ovarian reserve. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Jan;16(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60561-5.
Coccia ME, Rizzello F. Ovarian reserve. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Apr;1127:27-30. doi: 10.1196/annals.1434.011.
Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006 Nov-Dec;12(6):685-718. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml034. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
Broer SL, Broekmans FJ, Laven JS, Fauser BC. Anti-Mullerian hormone: ovarian reserve testing and its potential clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):688-701. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu020. Epub 2014 May 12.
Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
Polyzos NP, Nwoye M, Corona R, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Haentjens P, Camus M, Tournaye H. Live birth rates in Bologna poor responders treated with ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Apr;28(4):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
Sunkara SK, Coomarasamy A, Faris R, Braude P, Khalaf Y. Long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus short agonist versus antagonist regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.035. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
Steward RG, Lan L, Shah AA, Yeh JS, Price TM, Goldfarb JM, Muasher SJ. Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014 Apr;101(4):967-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.026. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
van Loendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, van der Veen F. Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):577-89. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq015. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
van der Gaast MH, Eijkemans MJ, van der Net JB, de Boer EJ, Burger CW, van Leeuwen FE, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Oct;13(4):476-80. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60633-5.
Verberg MF, Eijkemans MJ, Macklon NS, Heijnen EM, Baart EB, Hohmann FP, Fauser BC, Broekmans FJ. The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):5-12. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn053.
Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK. Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group? Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2005-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev149. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
Cascorbi I, Bruhn O, Werk AN. Challenges in pharmacogenetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 May;69 Suppl 1:17-23. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1492-x. Epub 2013 May 3.
Altmae S, Hovatta O, Stavreus-Evers A, Salumets A. Genetic predictors of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: where do we stand today? Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):813-28. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr034. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
Overbeek A, Lambalk N. Pharmacogenomics of ovulation induction: facilitating decisions on who, when and how to treat. Pharmacogenomics. 2009 Sep;10(9):1377-9. doi: 10.2217/pgs.09.110. No abstract available.
Loutradis D, Theofanakis C, Anagnostou E, Mavrogianni D, Partsinevelos GA. Genetic profile of SNP(s) and ovulation induction. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012 Mar;13(3):417-25. doi: 10.2174/138920112799361954.
Gromoll J, Ried T, Holtgreve-Grez H, Nieschlag E, Gudermann T. Localization of the human FSH receptor to chromosome 2 p21 using a genomic probe comprising exon 10. J Mol Endocrinol. 1994 Jun;12(3):265-71. doi: 10.1677/jme.0.0120265.
Simoni M, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E. The follicle-stimulating hormone receptor: biochemistry, molecular biology, physiology, and pathophysiology. Endocr Rev. 1997 Dec;18(6):739-73. doi: 10.1210/edrv.18.6.0320. No abstract available.
Aittomaki K, Lucena JL, Pakarinen P, Sistonen P, Tapanainen J, Gromoll J, Kaskikari R, Sankila EM, Lehvaslaiho H, Engel AR, Nieschlag E, Huhtaniemi I, de la Chapelle A. Mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene causes hereditary hypergonadotropic ovarian failure. Cell. 1995 Sep 22;82(6):959-68. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90275-9.
Yao Y, Ma CH, Tang HL, Hu YF. Influence of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) Ser680Asn polymorphism on ovarian function and in-vitro fertilization outcome: a meta-analysis. Mol Genet Metab. 2011 Aug;103(4):388-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Apr 17.
Laan M, Grigorova M, Huhtaniemi IT. Pharmacogenetics of follicle-stimulating hormone action. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2012 Jun;19(3):220-7. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3283534b11.
Huang X, Li L, Hong L, Zhou W, Shi H, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Sun X, Du J. The Ser680Asn polymorphism in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene is associated with the ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015 Apr;82(4):577-83. doi: 10.1111/cen.12573. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
Perez Mayorga M, Gromoll J, Behre HM, Gassner C, Nieschlag E, Simoni M. Ovarian response to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulation depends on the FSH receptor genotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Sep;85(9):3365-9. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.9.6789.
Lledo B, Guerrero J, Turienzo A, Ortiz JA, Morales R, Ten J, Llacer J, Bernabeu R. Effect of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor N680S polymorphism on the efficacy of follicle-stimulating hormone stimulation on donor ovarian response. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2013 May;23(5):262-8. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32835fe813.
van Wely M, Kwan I, Burt AL, Thomas J, Vail A, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG. Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;2011(2):CD005354. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005354.pub2.
Lledo B, Dapena P, Ortiz JA, Morales R, Llacer J, Bernabeu R. Clinical efficacy of recombinant versus highly purified follicle-stimulating hormone according to follicle-stimulating hormone receptor genotype. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2016 Jun;26(6):288-93. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000215.
Ascoli M, Fanelli F, Segaloff DL. The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor, a 2002 perspective. Endocr Rev. 2002 Apr;23(2):141-74. doi: 10.1210/edrv.23.2.0462.
Puett D, Li Y, DeMars G, Angelova K, Fanelli F. A functional transmembrane complex: the luteinizing hormone receptor with bound ligand and G protein. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007 Jan 2;260-262:126-36. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
Rousseau-Merck MF, Misrahi M, Atger M, Loosfelt H, Milgrom E, Berger R. Localization of the human luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor gene (LHCGR) to chromosome 2p21. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1990;54(1-2):77-9. doi: 10.1159/000132962.
Rousseau-Merck MF, Atger M, Loosfelt H, Milgrom E, Berger R. The chromosomal localization of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene (FSHR) on 2p21-p16 is similar to that of the luteinizing hormone receptor gene. Genomics. 1993 Jan;15(1):222-4. doi: 10.1006/geno.1993.1041.
Fanelli F, Puett D. Structural aspects of luteinizing hormone receptor: information from molecular modeling and mutagenesis. Endocrine. 2002 Aug;18(3):285-93. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:18:3:285.
Fanelli F, Themmen AP, Puett D. Lutropin receptor function: insights from natural, engineered, and computer-simulated mutations. IUBMB Life. 2001 Mar;51(3):149-55. doi: 10.1080/152165401753544214.
Capalbo A, Sagnella F, Apa R, Fulghesu AM, Lanzone A, Morciano A, Farcomeni A, Gangale MF, Moro F, Martinez D, Ciardulli A, Palla C, Uras ML, Spettu F, Cappai A, Carcassi C, Neri G, Tiziano FD. The 312N variant of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor gene (LHCGR) confers up to 2.7-fold increased risk of polycystic ovary syndrome in a Sardinian population. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012 Jul;77(1):113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04372.x.
Lindgren I, Baath M, Uvebrant K, Dejmek A, Kjaer L, Henic E, Bungum M, Bungum L, Cilio C, Leijonhufvud I, Skouby S, Andersen CY, Giwercman YL. Combined assessment of polymorphisms in the LHCGR and FSHR genes predict chance of pregnancy after in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2016 Mar;31(3):672-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev342. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
Valkenburg O, Uitterlinden AG, Piersma D, Hofman A, Themmen AP, de Jong FH, Fauser BC, Laven JS. Genetic polymorphisms of GnRH and gonadotrophic hormone receptors affect the phenotype of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2009 Aug;24(8):2014-22. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep113. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
Piersma D, Verhoef-Post M, Look MP, Uitterlinden AG, Pols HA, Berns EM, Themmen AP. Polymorphic variations in exon 10 of the luteinizing hormone receptor: functional consequences and associations with breast cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007 Sep 30;276(1-2):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.06.007. Epub 2007 Jul 17.
Simoni M, Tuttelmann F, Michel C, Bockenfeld Y, Nieschlag E, Gromoll J. Polymorphisms of the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor gene: association with maldescended testes and male infertility. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2008 Mar;18(3):193-200. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3282f4e98c.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ANG-FOS-2019-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.