Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in a National Population-based Cohort

NCT ID: NCT03524781

Last Updated: 2020-08-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

36292 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-02

Study Completion Date

2020-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the treatment of newly diagnosed gastro-esophageal reflux disease in a Danish national cohort, comparing medical and surgical treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim: To compare rate of surgery with medical treatment in patients with newly diagnosed gastro-esophageal reflux disease in a nationwide population based cohort over 15 years.

Background: Between 1990 and 1997, frequency of anti-reflux surgery in USA rose from 4,4 per 100.000 inhabitants to 12 per 100.000 inhabitants. In the same period a trans-abdominal laparoscopic approach increased to 64% of cases and mortality as well as morbidity decreased. The operation rate peaked around 2000 with an increase of 260% to approximately 16.7 operations per 100.000 inhabitants. Complications fell to its lowest point around 2000 as well.

Hereafter, the frequency of anti-reflux surgery dropped by 40% between 2000 and 2006. Complications in the form of morbidity and mortality rates steadily rose again, but the patients having performed surgery were now older and have longer hospital stays and more comorbidity. A slight rise in frequency of anti-reflux surgery to 6,1 per 100.000 inhabitants was registered in 2010 and at this time length of stay, morbidity and mortality rates have decreased, probably illustrating an increased experience. Interesting to note is, that in the American data, use of laparoscopic approach does tend to plateau at 70-80%.

It is unknown whether anti-reflux surgery in Denmark has followed the same trend. There are important differences in the setup of surgical service that may affect the results, as open anti-reflux surgery never gained much popularity in Denmark. Also, significantly fewer centers offer the procedure. In a study of re-operative anti-reflux surgery based on data from 1997-2005, a primary anti-reflux surgery rate of 5.2 per 100.000 inhabitants was reported. However, we do not know how this rate has developed or was preceded.

Hypothesis: From 2000-2015 there has been an increase in diagnosis of GERD and in the use of anti-secretory drugs, but a decrease in the utilization of anti-reflux surgery.

Methods and materials: Patient selection will be done through the Danish National Patient Registers. Included will be the period 2000-2015 for a total of 15 years of follow-up.

All adult Danish patients diagnosed with GERD and GERD-related diagnosis will be identified (ICD-10 DK21.0-21.9B \& DK20.9B) using The National Patient Registry.To validate GERD-diagnosis, upper endoscopy must have been performed no more than three months before time of diagnosis.

Patients with GERD-diagnosis within previous four years or with concomitant diagnosis requiring independent anti-secretory treatment will be excluded (DK25.0-9, DK26.0-9, DK27.0-9, DK22.7 \& DE16.4B). Patients diagnosed with cancer of the gastrointestinal tract (DC15-26) will also be excluded.

Using the Danish National Prescription Register, use of H2-antagonists (A02BA), proton pump inhibitors (A02BC), prostaglandins A02BB and bismuth, alginate and sucralfate (A02BX) will be identified in daily doses within two years of GERD-diagnosis. Anti-reflux surgery within the same period will be identified from The National Patient Registry using the procedure codes (NOMESCO: KJBC00, KJBC01, KJBC02, KJBW96, KJBW97).

From The National Patient Registry, age, sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index will be retrieved. Mortality during follow-up will be retrieved from The Civil Registration System.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastroesophageal Reflux

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Danish adult patient with GERD-diagnosis verified by upper endoscopy 1997-2014

Exclusion Criteria

* Any diagnosis of cancer in the gastrointestinal tract during follow-up
* Patients with GERD-diagnosis within previous four years or with concomitant diagnosis requiring independent anti-secretory treatment will be excluded (DK25.0-9, DK26.0-9, DK27.0-9, DK22.7 \& DE16.4B).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kolding Sygehus

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Odense Patient Data Explorative Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Southern Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jonas Sanberg Jensen

MD, PhD Student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Surgery, Kolding Hospital

Kolding, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JSJ_OP445

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.