Targeting Hypervigilance and Autonomic Arousal: the Psycho-physiologic Model of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
NCT ID: NCT04960566
Last Updated: 2025-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-19
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Physiology of GERD and Treatment Response
NCT04292470
Cognitive-behavioral Therapy for the Diseases Associated With Esophageal-brain-gut Axis Communication Abnormalities.
NCT06939465
Important Correlation Between Anxiety and Reflux Symptoms in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT06151067
"The Voice of Reflux" - Backflow of Gastric Juice Leads to Irritation of the Vocal Folds: Are There Typical Differences in the Voice?
NCT06495606
Correlates of GERD Symptom Severity
NCT03020550
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
RANDOMIZATION AND BLINDING: Participants will be blinded as to the intervention they will receive. Participants will be randomized in the following manner: In Aim 1, we will block on site (NU or WashU) and randomize patients to eCBT+ or SOC within sites. In Aim 2, we will block on site and whether patients have hypersensitivity. Patients within site and hypersensitivity category (no vs. yes) will be randomized. Note that in randomizing in this way, patients for Aim 3 who exhibit hypersensitivity will also be randomized within site. We will allocate participants to one of 2 study arms in a blinded fashion: eCBT+ (esophageal Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) or sham-SOC Lifestyle Coaching. Subjects will be de-briefed at their week 25 visit.
STUDY PROCEDURES: Study procedures include mucosal impedance (MI) performed during standard of care endoscopy, the use of questionnaires: GERD PROMIS (a measure of symptoms), EHAS (Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale), NEQOL (Northwestern Esophageal Quality of Life), GERDQ (a measure of symptom frequency), and patient satisfaction, as well as measurement of heart rate variability both at the research site and via continuous FitBit usage throughout the treatment period. For Aim 3, repeat endoscopy, mucosal impedance, and pH impedance will be performed on a subset of patients 8 weeks after conclusion of intervention.
ENDPOINTS: Primary endpoints include change in symptoms and quality of life as measured by GERDQ, GERD PROMIS and NEQOL questionnaires, change in hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety as measured by EHAS and change in autonomic arousal as measured by HRV before and after treatment with either intervention arm. Secondary endpoints include change in mucosal impedance measurements and symptom index (as determined by pH-Impedance monitoring) before and after treatment, as well as patient satisfaction with treatment and engagement with treatment as defined by the number of sessions completed.
RATIONALE: We selected a parallel design study to explore the treatment effect of eCBT+ compared to a sham-SOC Lifestyle Coaching approach. Power and sample size considerations were based on the primary aim of comparing questionnaire results and HRV measurements in the proposed two-arm clinical trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
eCBT+
eCBT+ participants will be enrolled in 6, 45-minute sessions delivered via a secure video platform with a GI psychologist. To reinforce concepts reviewed in the sessions, participants will complete weekly home practice exercises. The targets are 1) improved maladaptive cognitive-affective processes associated with increased hypervigilance and symptom anxiety, 2) reduced behaviors associated with EHA including avoidance, increased medication/healthcare utilization and 3) reduced autonomic nervous system (ANS) arousal by increased HRV. Participants will learn to identify, question, and modify maladaptive thoughts, beliefs, and assumptions related to their symptoms (symptom anxiety). Systematic exposure to feared events are used to reduce maladaptive coping strategies (hypervigilance, PPI overuse, HCU). Specific, paced diaphragmatic breathing exercises (Resonance Frequency Breathing) designed to increase HRV are the last component (visceral hypersensitivity, reflux physiology).
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
The CBT intervention is based on the theoretical framework that under stress (reflux symptoms) a person makes a rapid cognitive appraisal of the potential threat (automatic thoughts), leading to both emotional and physical responses in the body, thereby reacting behaviorally (avoidance, increased HCU) in an attempt to mitigate unpleasantness. CBT is a collaborative, present-focused treatment that utilizes a skills-based approach with home practice exercises. CBT targets automatic thoughts and appraisals of threat via education, self-monitoring of stressors and symptoms, and strategies to reframe problematic thinking patterns to more adaptive ones. Resonance frequency breathing (RFB) is achieved when a person breathes at a pace, typically 4 to 6 breaths per minute, that engages the body's baroreflex to modulate arousal. Prior research demonstrates 4 to 6 weeks of RFB training is sufficient to significantly increase baseline HRV with enduring effects for up to 6 months.
Sham-SOC Lifestyle Coaching
Patients randomized to the SOC condition will receive lifestyle guidance recommended for patients with GERD over a period of 6, 45-minute sessions with the GI psychologist to maintain consistency of delivery between the two intervention arms. Topics include maintaining a healthy weight, identifying triggering food and drink, making healthy food choices, eating behaviors, smoking and/or alcohol use, and timing of meals. The SOC condition will be carefully designed to not include any principles of the eCBT+ condition rather be based solely on patient education and encouragement to practice lifestyle changes on their own.
Sham-SOC Lifestyle Coaching
Sham-SOC Lifestyle Coaching
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
The CBT intervention is based on the theoretical framework that under stress (reflux symptoms) a person makes a rapid cognitive appraisal of the potential threat (automatic thoughts), leading to both emotional and physical responses in the body, thereby reacting behaviorally (avoidance, increased HCU) in an attempt to mitigate unpleasantness. CBT is a collaborative, present-focused treatment that utilizes a skills-based approach with home practice exercises. CBT targets automatic thoughts and appraisals of threat via education, self-monitoring of stressors and symptoms, and strategies to reframe problematic thinking patterns to more adaptive ones. Resonance frequency breathing (RFB) is achieved when a person breathes at a pace, typically 4 to 6 breaths per minute, that engages the body's baroreflex to modulate arousal. Prior research demonstrates 4 to 6 weeks of RFB training is sufficient to significantly increase baseline HRV with enduring effects for up to 6 months.
Sham-SOC Lifestyle Coaching
Sham-SOC Lifestyle Coaching
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 18-80 years old
* Mentally capable to provide informed consent
* Fluent in English
* Have symptoms of GERD (heartburn, regurgitation, and non-cardiac chest pain)
* Have failed an appropriate compliant trial of PPI therapy with a GERDQ score ≥6.
* Able to undergo endoscopy, ambulatory reflux monitoring, and manometry
* Be interested in behavioral interventions for ongoing symptoms.
Exclusion Criteria
* Active severe erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles Grade C or D), Long segment Barrett's esophagus (Zap score of 4)
* Prior gastrointestinal surgery of the esophagus and/or stomach
* Current signs or symptoms of heart disease. All patients with non-cardiac chest pain are required to have a cardiologist evaluation as standard of care work up in the evaluation of non-cardiac chest pain.
* Unstable medical illness with ongoing diagnostic work-up and treatment. Patients with well-controlled hypertension, diabetes and a remote history of ischemic heart disease that is deemed stable, as judged by the investigator can be included.
* History of drug addiction, drug abuse or alcoholism.
* Current neurologic or cognitive impairment, which would preclude ability to obtain informed consent.
* Pregnant patients.
* Special vulnerable populations including children, prisoners, institutionalized individuals.
* Bleeding disorder or requirement of NSAID/aspirin during monitoring period.
* Drugs that affect gastrointestinal symptoms (H2 blockers, antacids, metoclopramide, domperidone, erythromycin, anticholinergics \[bentyl, levsin, belladonna etc.\]). Antidepressants can be continued at stable dose.
* Patients found to have achalasia, a spastic disorder, hypercontractile disorder or functional obstruction at the esophagogastric junction will be excluded
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
OTHER
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John Pandolfino
Hans Popper Professor of Medicine and Chief
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John E Pandolfino, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Tifffany Taft, PsyD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU00214532
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.