Understanding the Pathophysiology and Effects of Diaphragmatic Breathing in Upright Gastroesophageal Reflux

NCT ID: NCT02972047

Last Updated: 2020-12-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-06

Study Completion Date

2020-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to understand why patients have predominantly upright gastroesophageal reflux disease by comparing such patients to healthy persons AND whether a behavioral intervention (diaphragmatic breathing) will impact this disease

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are two major patterns of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), predominantly daytime and upright reflux and predominantly nocturnal and supine reflux.

Traditionally, upright reflux has been attributed to more frequent or wider opening with transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) while supine reflux results from a consistently reduced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. This may further be accounted for by the finding of larger hiatal hernias and greater pressure gradients between the crura and LES when comparing supine to upright refluxers. These findings may help explain supine reflux, but they offer little insight into the mechanisms of upright reflux.

In this study the investigators will be recruiting twenty healthy persons and up to 60 patients with GERD will be recruited from the clinical practice at Mayo Clinic Rochester. The investigators aim to study the intervention on 40 patients with GERD. However, recognizing that up to 33% of patients with typical symptoms of GERD will not have reflux by ambulatory pH monitoring (pH power of hydration), the investigators provide for enrolling up to a maximum of 60 patients which should be sufficient to yield 40 patients with upright GERD by pH monitoring. In addition, up to 10 additional healthy persons may be recruited.

Subjects with upright reflux and healthy controls will be randomized into one of two groups:

Experimental: Diaphragmatic breathing or Sham comparator: (listening to music/watching Television (TV) for 30 minutes after each meal to see how this impacts the disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

GERD

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Reflux

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Diaphragmatic Breathing

Subjects randomized to the experimental intervention arm will receive instructions and rationale for Diaphragmatic Breathing in the postprandial state and receive detailed instruction in diaphragmatic breathing.

Following the office visit the patients with upright GERD and healthy persons will undergo a further 24 hours of pH impedance monitoring. This group will practice diaphragmatic breathing for 30 minutes after each meal.

1. During the second 24 hour period patients with GERD and healthy persons will again consume the standard pH neutral refluxogenic meal note this with an event marker
2. After 48 hours patients with GERD and healthy persons will present to the esophageal laboratory for probe removal

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Diaphragmatic Breathing

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects in this are practice diaphragmatic breathing for 30 minutes after each meal.

Life style counseling

Subjects randomized to the Sham Comparator intervention arm will engage in sham therapy (listening to music/watching TV for 30 minutes after each meal)

Following the office visit the patients with upright GERD and healthy persons will undergo a further 24 hours of pH impedance monitoring. This group will will engage in sham therapy (listening to music/watching TV for 30 minutes after each meal)

1. During the second 24 hour period patients with GERD and healthy persons will again consume the standard pH neutral refluxogenic meal note this with an event marker
2. After 48 hours patients with GERD and healthy persons will present to the esophageal laboratory for probe removal

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Comparator

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sham therapy (listening to music/watching TV for 30 minutes after each meal

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diaphragmatic Breathing

Subjects in this are practice diaphragmatic breathing for 30 minutes after each meal.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sham Comparator

Sham therapy (listening to music/watching TV for 30 minutes after each meal

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

-Patients 18 years of age or older with no symptoms of GERD


* Patients 18 years of age or older with symptoms of GERD
* Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within the past 6 months and a prior diagnostic pH impedance study showing predominantly upright reflux

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient who fulfil ROME IV Criteria for rumination disorder20
* Clinical evidence of significant cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, hematological, neurological (e.g., spinal cord injuries, dementia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease), psychiatric or other disease that may interfere with the objectives of the study and/or pose safety concerns.\*
* Any prior gastric or esophageal surgery and significant intestinal or colonic resection\*
* Hiatal hernia measuring 3 cm or larger as assessed by endoscopic or radiological studies
* Prior history of Los Angeles Grade C or D esophagitis, or esophageal stricture.
* Current use opioid analgesics or anticholinergic drugs.\* We will permit low doses of tricyclic antidepressants, nortriptyline (up to 50 mg/day) or amitriptyline (up to 25 mg/day) provided they were commenced 3 months prior to the screening period, calcium channel or adrenergic1 antagonists
* Current use of proton pump inhibitors
* Known significant esophageal motor disorder (ie achalasia, aperistalsis, functional obstruction, jackhammer, distal esophageal spasm)\*
* Inability to read due to: blindness, cognitive dysfunction, or English language illiteracy \*
* Pregnant and lactating females \*


* Ongoing use of Proton Pump Inhibitors ( PPIs) or a history consistent with GE reflux for 3 months or longer duration in past.
* Prior history of Los Angeles Grade B-D esophagitis
* Prior history of GERD on the basis of pH testing
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Magnus Halland

PI

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Magnus Halland, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16-007005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id