Ultrasound Greater Occipital Nerve Block at C2 Level Compared to Landmark-based Greater Occipital Nerve Block
NCT ID: NCT03478735
Last Updated: 2021-06-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-07-17
2021-06-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Greater Occipital Nerve Injection Study
NCT01988363
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Multifidus Cervicis Plan Block Vs Greater Occipital Nerve Block for Cervicogenic Headache
NCT04454541
Non-pharmacological Management of Chronic Migraine
NCT02953015
Ultrasound-guided Precise Superficial Cervical Plexus Block
NCT03695211
Efficacy of Adding Greater Occipital Nerve Block to Trigger Point Injection in Patients With Neck Pain
NCT07058636
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The greater occipital nerve (GON) has been implicated in several conditions that prompt referral to pain medicine specialists, including occipital neuralgia and cervicogenic headache. According to the International Headache Society, a local anesthetic block of the GON can aid in the diagnosis and treatment of occipital neuralgia. Many practitioners perform GON injections using a conventional approach, relying solely on superficial bone-based anatomic landmarks to infiltrate local anesthetic and corticosteroid around the nerve at the level of the superior nuchal line. The ambiguity of these injections poses a risk of anesthetizing adjacent structures or injecting into vessels, such as the occipital artery.
In an attempt to mitigate these risks and improve the efficacy of GON injections, ultrasound has been increasingly utilized. Multiple studies have demonstrated successful ultrasound-guided GON blockade at the superior nuchal line and improvement in pain scores compared to non-guided injections. The investigators' preliminary data confirms the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of an ultrasound-guided GON block technique at the level of C2, but it is not yet known whether this technique provides greater pain relief and functional outcomes compared to traditional injections.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ultrasound Guided GON Block at C2
Ultrasound Guided Greater Occipital Nerve Block at C2
Ultrasound Guided Greater Occipital Nerve Block at C2
Ultrasound guided injection
Landmark based GON Block
Landmark-Based Greater Occipital Nerve Block
Landmark-Based Greater Occipital Nerve Block
Traditional landmark-guided technique at the superior nuchal line. This approach relies solely on superficial bone-based anatomic landmarks to infiltrate local anesthetic and corticosteroid around the nerve at the level of the superior nuchal line.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound Guided Greater Occipital Nerve Block at C2
Ultrasound guided injection
Landmark-Based Greater Occipital Nerve Block
Traditional landmark-guided technique at the superior nuchal line. This approach relies solely on superficial bone-based anatomic landmarks to infiltrate local anesthetic and corticosteroid around the nerve at the level of the superior nuchal line.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 18 years and older (no upper age limit defined)
3. Imaging of cervical spine within last year (either x-ray, MRI or CT)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Use of new preventative medications 1 month prior or during study enrollment
3. Evidence of impaired sensation in the GON dermatome region (posterior scalp to the vertex of the cranium) from neurological, dermatological, or other disease process
4. Evidence of cranial defect or other anatomical abnormality near the target injection site
5. History of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, or current use of anticoagulant medications
6. Pregnancy
7. History of adverse reaction or allergy to local anesthetic agents or corticosteroids
8. Occipital nerve block within the past three months.
9. Unavailability for appropriate follow-up throughout the whole duration of study
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Matthew Pingree
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew J Pingree, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-002724
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.