Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Dry Needling Targeting Rectus Capitus Posterior Major on Individuals With Headaches
NCT ID: NCT07309874
Last Updated: 2025-12-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-02-01
2026-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main goals of this research are to examine the effects of a single session of ultrasound-guided dry needling on headache symptoms and to confirm the safety, accuracy, and consistency of the proposed needling technique using ultrasound imaging.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
PROCEDURE: Each participant will complete one study visit lasting approximately 60 minutes. During each data collection session:
1. Screening: Participants will undergo screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria.
o Eligible participants will then complete: A Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) of their headache pain on a scale from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worse pain) including: Current rating; Best rating; Worst rating in the past 6 months; Complete the Headache Disability Index (HDI)
2. Positioning: Participants will be positioned prone on a treatment table with cervical spine alignment monitored using an inclinometer to ensure cervical lordosis is under 10°.
3. Landmark Identification \& Needle Insertion:
* Landmark Identification: The PI will palpate and mark two bony landmarks in the upper neck including: 1. The C2 Spinous process, a distinct bone that can be felt at the top of the spine below the skull, and 2. The C1 Transverse process, a bony ridge located just below and slightly to the side of the base of the skull at \~45-degree angle from the ear. (These landmarks will help determine the correct location for the needle insertion.)
* Needle Insertion: Sterile, 0.25 gauge/diameter, 40 mm needles will be used. A new needle will be used for each individual needle insertion before being discarded in a sharps container. The needle will be inserted just below the base of the skull, slightly off the center line of the neck. Each participant will have two separate needle insertions during the single data collection visit. Two dry needle insertion techniques will be performed in a randomized order: Method 1: 30° (relative to the frontal plane) insertion angle toward the occiput, and Method 2: 45° (relative to the frontal plane) insertion angle toward the occiput.
* Needle Target: The target of the needle is a deep muscle (Rectus Capitus Posterior Major) that attaches to the base of the skull (occiput). For both methods, the needle will be advanced until bony contact is achieved, and then slightly pulled in/out within the muscle to visualize needle placement on ultrasound
* Randomization of technique order (Method 1 vs. Method 2) will be generated using the list randomizer from https://www.random.org/lists/
4. Ultrasound Imaging: An investigator will use a Sonosite PX ultrasound device to capture still images and 3-second video clips of needle placement relative to the RCPMaj and surrounding anatomy. Participants may be asked to laterally deviate their eyes to assist in muscle visualization.
5. Data Collection: Investigators will record whether a bony backdrop was felt, if the needle reached the RCPMaj, and the length of unused needle remaining outside the skin as well as if the needle pierce through the vertebral artery.
IMMEDIATE POST-PROCEDURE: Participants will be asked to rate their current level of pain immediately following the intervention on the NPRS from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worse pain)
POST-PROCEDURE FOLLOW UP VISIT: 24-48 hours following data collection, participants will be asked to complete the following via a secure, anonymous online survey link to the electronic platform Qualtrics®. Participants will be sent an email with the secure survey link and reminder of their unique study ID. Participants will only use their unique assigned study ID. No identifying information (name, email address, or IP address) will be collected in Qualtrics® survey responses. Participants will report: 1) Post-needling soreness (Yes/No), 2) NRPS including Current rating, Best rating and Worst rating in the last 24-48 hours, and 3) Headache Disability Index
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dry needling
Dry needling
Each subject will receive two separate dry needle insertions targeting the rectus capitus posterior major. Method 1 will be 30 degrees (relative to the frontal plane) insertion angle toward the occiput. Method 2 will be 45 degrees (relative to the frontal plane) insertion angle toward the occiput.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dry needling
Each subject will receive two separate dry needle insertions targeting the rectus capitus posterior major. Method 1 will be 30 degrees (relative to the frontal plane) insertion angle toward the occiput. Method 2 will be 45 degrees (relative to the frontal plane) insertion angle toward the occiput.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Current reports of headache
* Tenderness to palpation of suboccipital muscles with Numeric Pain Rating Scale score ≥ 2/10
* No history of cervical spine surgery or neurological disorders
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed bleeding disorder
* Currently using anticoagulant medications
* Currently using anti-platelet medications
* Diagnosed systemic joint diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis
* Active infection
* Diabetes
* Cancer
* Fibromyalgia
* Cervical radiculopathy
* Inability to tolerate prone positioning for the duration of the procedure.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Texas Woman's University
OTHER
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gary A Kearns, PT, ScD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kearns GA, Lierly M, Gilbert KK, Dommerholt J. Guidelines to minimize risk when dry needling the rectus capitus posterior major muscle. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2025 Apr;76:103260. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103260. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
Kearns GA, Hooper TL, Brismee JM, Allen B, Lierly M, Gilbert KK, Pendergrass TJ, Edwards D. Influence of clinical experience on accuracy and safety of obliquus capitus inferior dry needling in unembalmed cadavers. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Dec;38(12):2052-2061. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1901326. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Kearns G, Fernandez-De-Las-Penas C, Brismee JM, Gan J, Doidge J. New perspectives on dry needling following a medical model: are we screening our patients sufficiently? J Man Manip Ther. 2019 Jul;27(3):172-179. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1567011. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Nov;17(11):954-976. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3.
Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Linde M, Steiner TJ. The global prevalence of headache: an update, with analysis of the influences of methodological factors on prevalence estimates. J Headache Pain. 2022 Apr 12;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01402-2.
Jung A, Carvalho GF, Szikszay TM, Pawlowsky V, Gabler T, Luedtke K. Physical Therapist Interventions to Reduce Headache Intensity, Frequency, and Duration in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2024 Feb 1;104(2):pzad154. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad154.
Pourahmadi M, Dommerholt J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Koes BW, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Mansournia MA, Delavari S, Keshtkar A, Bahramian M. Dry Needling for the Treatment of Tension-Type, Cervicogenic, or Migraine Headaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2021 May 4;101(5):pzab068. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab068.
Navarro-Santana MJ, Sanchez-Infante J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Martin-Casas P, Plaza-Manzano G. Effectiveness of Dry Needling for Myofascial Trigger Points Associated with Neck Pain Symptoms: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 14;9(10):3300. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103300.
Chys M, De Meulemeester K, De Greef I, Murillo C, Kindt W, Kouzouz Y, Lescroart B, Cagnie B. Clinical Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain-An Umbrella Review. J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 2;12(3):1205. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031205.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
No funding number available
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB-FY2026-36
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id