Advanced Monitoring to Inform and Guide Perioperative Hemodynamic Optimization 1 (AMIGO-1) Study

NCT ID: NCT03477617

Last Updated: 2020-09-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-03

Study Completion Date

2019-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Serious complications occur in about 16% of major surgeries. Episode of hypotension during surgery may be a leading cause of these complications. Even though hypotension occurs frequently during surgery, choosing the correct treatment remains difficult in clinical practice. Physicians are often uncertain as to whether low blood pressure should be treated with intravenous fluid or vasoactive drugs. The first treatment of choice typically involves administering more intravenous fluid; however, excessive fluid administration during surgery has been shown to be deleterious. New minimally invasive hemodynamic monitors now offer a potential solution by guiding physicians with respect to the choice of appropriate intervention (i.e., fluid versus vasoactive drugs). The Investigators will conduct a single-center feasibility randomized control trial (RCT) at the Toronto General Hospital (Toronto, ON, Canada) of an algorithm to manage hypotension during surgery based on the information captured by a minimally invasive monitor. Sixty participants who are aged 40 years or older and scheduled to undergo an abdominal, pelvic or vascular surgery will be randomized to have the intraoperative hypotension managed by either the new algorithm (guided by the monitor) or usual care. Participants will be recruited over 12 to 18 months, and followed for 30 days to describe differences in clinical care, hemodynamics, complications, and death. The feasibility of a future multicenter RCT will be assessed based on this present study demonstrating that (1) the algorithm can be practically implemented in a clinical setting where hemodynamic monitors are not typically used; (2) initial descriptive data suggest differences in care between groups; (3) there are no obvious major harms from the protocol; and (4) there is an acceptable participation rate among eligible patients. These data will inform any required changes to the algorithm and protocol to allow for its application in a future study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intraoperative Fluid Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel Assignment Participants are randomized to two groups; both groups will have an intraoperative minimally invasive cardiac output monitor connected.

In the intervention arm, the anesthesiologist will treat episodes of hypotension using a hemodynamic algorithm based on the information for the cardiac output monitor.

In the control arm, the anesthesiologist will treat episodes of hypotension using standard of care management and will be blinded to the information from the cardiac output monitor. Data from the monitor will be stored for comparison between the arms.

This is a pilot study; therefore, the main objective is to assess feasibility of a future multicenter RCT, based on the following domains: (i) participation rate among eligible patients; (ii) practicality of implementing the study intervention in a clinical setting; (iii) collect descriptive data for differences between the 2 arms; (iv) collect safety data to ensure no harm has resulted from the study protocol
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Algorithm

In the experimental group, the anesthesiologist will have complete access to data from the minimal invasive cardiac output monitor. During the intraoperative period, the anesthesiologist will be instructed to use a hemodynamic management algorithm to manage episodes of significant hypotension

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Algorithm

Intervention Type OTHER

Anesthesiologists are instructed to use the study's algorithm to manage intraoperative hypotension in response to the cardiac output monitor values.

Usual Hemodynamic Management

In the control arm, the participant will be monitored by the cardiac output monitor, but the anesthesiologists in the operating room will be blinded to hemodynamic data from the monitor. Data from the monitor will be stored electronically and used to compare hemodynamic parameters between study arms.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Usual hemodynamic management

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Anesthesiologists are instructed to manage intraoperative hypotension based on their usual clinical care, without information from cardiac output monitor

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Algorithm

Anesthesiologists are instructed to use the study's algorithm to manage intraoperative hypotension in response to the cardiac output monitor values.

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual hemodynamic management

Anesthesiologists are instructed to manage intraoperative hypotension based on their usual clinical care, without information from cardiac output monitor

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥40 years
* Abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic or vascular surgery requiring general anesthesia and planned postoperative stay of ≥48 hours for medical reasons
* Elevated perioperative cardiovascular risk based on at least one of the following:

* cardiovascular comorbidities: coronary artery disease, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral arterial disease
* elevated age (≥70 y),
* smoker,
* hypertension,
* diabetes mellitus,
* or preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60mL/min/1.73m2
* Planned placement of invasive arterial line for clinical care

Exclusion Criteria

* Preoperative dialysis dependence
* Minimally invasive procedures (i.e., laparoscopic or endovascular approach)
* Intra-thoracic procedures
* Non-sinus rhythm
* Liver resection surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jo Carroll

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Duminda N Wijeysundera, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universtiy Health Network. Toronto General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15-9764

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

2.5 Versus 5 Minutes Trial
NCT06314074 COMPLETED NA