Non Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring to Guide Goal Directed Fluid Therapy in High Risk Patients Undergoing Urgent Surgical Repair of Proximal Femoral Fractures

NCT ID: NCT02382185

Last Updated: 2018-07-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2017-09-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Improving or maximising cardiac output in the perioperative setting through the use of goal directed fluid therapy has been shown to reduce complications and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The evidence for patients having surgery to repair a fractured neck of femur is less robust but many of these latter patients are elderly and often at high risk of complications.

Patients undergoing surgery (including surgery for hip fracture) under spinal anaesthesia have not had access to goal directed fluid therapy because of the invasive nature of the existing monitoring technology such as oesophageal doppler. The availability of a non invasive cardiac monitoring device, the Clearsight™, now makes goal directed fluid therapy a possibility for this group of patients.

This is a randomised controlled, observer blinded trial to assess the effects of goal directed fluid therapy in high-risk patients undergoing surgical repair of proximal femoral fractures.

The aim of the trial is to test the hypothesis that maximising circulating volume intra-operatively with balanced crystalloid reduces post-operative morbidity in high-risk patients undergoing urgent surgical repair of proximal femoral fractures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The management of fractured neck of femur in the elderly population is of clinical and political interest in the United Kingdom at present, with a current national audit in progress to look at anaesthetic management and clinical outcomes. It is estimated that the number of patients that sustain a hip fracture will reach 100,000 cases per annum by 2033 with a cost to the NHS of some £ 2.7 billion. Outcomes for this group remain poor with a mortality of 8% at 1 month, increasing to 20-33% at 1 year4. Complication rates for this group also remain significant with between 20 and 60% of patients having significant postoperative complications. These complications are not only associated with increased length of stay and healthcare costs, but also reduced long-term survival.

Improving or maximising cardiac output in the perioperative setting either through the use of intravenous fluids, or in combination with inotropes has been shown to reduce complication rates following surgery in a variety of settings including those with fractured neck of femurs. A recent meta analysis of optimisation trials has shown that for every 100 patients in whom the intervention is provided, patients will avoid a complication, and length of stay will be reduced by 1 day. Importantly the intervention is also associated with no harm. In 1997 by using the oesophageal Doppler to guide fluid therapy in an attempt to maximise cardiac output, Sinclair managed to reduce the time patients who were operated on for a fractured neck of femur were deemed fit for medical discharge from 15 to 10 days (P\<0.05). Stroke volume was significantly increased in the protocol group, and although postoperative complication rates were not reported in this trial, it is inferred that they were reduced. A similar trial comparing conventional fluid therapy versus therapy guided by either central venous pressure measurements or oesophageal Doppler showed a similar reduction in time to being medically fit for discharge. This trial did report morbidity, which showed a non-significant trend to improvement in subjects who received oesophageal Doppler monitoring.

One of the main limitations of these trials are the relatively small numbers, with just 20 per group in the Sinclair trial and 30 per groups in the Venn trials, yet even with small numbers an improvement in outcome was seen. A larger trial has recently been completed using a more invasive calibrated measure of cardiac output, targeting a somewhat aggressive oxygen delivery of \> 600ml/min/m2 using inotropic support in elderly fractured neck of femur patients. Few patients actually achieved this goal, however there was again a non-significant reduction in complications (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.54-1.16) however the trial was underpowered due to issues with recruitment. The trial recruited 149 patients in total and to date is the largest study to examine this population despite the impact that this population has on the health services both within the NHS and worldwide. In addition all of the trials described included in their recruitment a broad group of patients some of whom could be considered to be at low risk of post operative complications.

Within this group of elderly patients a high-risk group exist. The Nottingham hip fracture score (NHFS) is a validated scoring system that predicts patients at increased risk of both 30 day and 1-year mortality. A NHFS ≥ 5 was associated with a mortality of 13.7% vs. 3.5% at 30 days (P\<0.001) and 45.5% vs. 15.9% at 1 year (P\<0.001). It is assumed that this high-risk group with an increased mortality rate also have an increased complication rate, and hence any effective intervention would have a greater impact on outcomes.

An increasing number of operations to repair fractured necks of femur are being performed awake under spinal anaesthesia. Technology such as oesophageal Doppler is not suitable as it cannot easily be tolerated when awake, and arterial based pulse waveform analysis requires an invasive procedure to be performed. Hence many patients do not receive goal directed therapy even though it may be of clinical benefit. A recent economic analysis has also suggested that goal directed therapy in this group is not only cost effective but also associated with cost savings.

The Clearsight™ non invasive cardiac output device measures blood pressure using the volume clamp method developed by the Czech physiologist Jan Penaz. Using a simple non-invasive finger cuff, the volume of an artery is kept clamped at a constant diameter. Changes in diameter are measured by a photo-plethysmograph within the finger cuff, and a servo controller applies counter pressure to keep the diameter of the artery constant. This allows the measurement of beat to beat blood pressure and hence cardiac output can also be calculated. The simple and non invasive nature of this device makes it suitable to use in patients undergoing repair of fractured neck of femur regardless of the type of anaesthetic. It requires no calibration, and would make goal directed therapy accessible to this group. The Clearsight has been shown to be a valid measure of cardiac output.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual care

No intervention apart from application of clearsight monitor. Prior to induction of anaesthesia the control group will have a Clearsight cardiac monitor probe placed on a suitable finger and baseline haemodynamic measurements will be taken. All fluid management and administration of vasopressor therapy will be at the discretion of the anaesthetist as per the current practice at the host institution. Data on stroke volume, heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac output, oxygen saturations, will be recorded at baseline and then every 5 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Application of clearsight monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

The clear sight monitor will be applied to measure stroke volume.

Fluid optimisation

Application of clearsight monitor, optimisation of blood pressure and fluid optimisation. A Clearsight cardiac probe is attached and after induction of anaesthesia stroke volume is optimised using 250ml boluses of Hartmann's solution. The SV measurement prior to the final fluid bolus will be the optimal SV. Mean arterial blood pressure will be maintained within 30% of baseline values using a phenylephrine infusion.Data on haemodynamics will be recorded at baseline and then every 5 minutes, as well as before and after a fluid bolus. Haemoglobin will be maintained at\>10g/dL with blood transfusion as required.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fluid optimisation

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention will consist of optimising stroke volume with 250ml of Hartmanns solution

Optimisation of blood pressure

Intervention Type DRUG

Phenylephrine infusion will be used to target a mean arterial blood pressure to within 30% of baseline (preoperative) value

Application of clearsight monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

The clear sight monitor will be applied to measure stroke volume.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fluid optimisation

The intervention will consist of optimising stroke volume with 250ml of Hartmanns solution

Intervention Type OTHER

Optimisation of blood pressure

Phenylephrine infusion will be used to target a mean arterial blood pressure to within 30% of baseline (preoperative) value

Intervention Type DRUG

Application of clearsight monitor

The clear sight monitor will be applied to measure stroke volume.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients due to undergo urgent or emergency repair of a proximal femoral fracture who have a Nottingham hip fracture score (NHFS) ≥ 5 i.e. patients who are regarded as 'high risk'.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 50 years. Patients scoring 5 on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification Multiple injuries requiring operative management
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simon Davies, MB FRCA MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

York Teaching Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Harrogate Hospital

Harrogate, Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Davies SJ, Yates DR, Wilson RJT, Murphy Z, Gibson A, Allgar V, Collyer T. A randomised trial of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring to guide haemodynamic optimisation in high risk patients undergoing urgent surgical repair of proximal femoral fractures (ClearNOF trial NCT02382185). Perioper Med (Lond). 2019 Aug 8;8:8. doi: 10.1186/s13741-019-0119-x. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31406569 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

YOR-A02333

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.