The Australian Colonic Large Sessile Lesion Endoscopic Resection Study
NCT ID: NCT03471793
Last Updated: 2025-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
5000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-02-24
2037-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Australian Colonic Advanced Mucosal Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Study
NCT02000141
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colonic Sessile Serrated Polyps
NCT02967107
Prospective Evaluation of Pain Assessment and Management Protocol for Post-procedural Pain After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Polyps >20mm
NCT03471156
Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection of Mucosal and Submucosal Lesions in the Stomach
NCT02306707
Prediction of Dysplasia Within Sessile Serrated Polyps Using Endoscopic Imaging; a Prospective Observational Study
NCT03100552
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Australian Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection study (ACE), comprises two multicentre prospective observational studies which examined EMR of colonic LSL (Ethics approval No.s HREC JH/TG 2008/9/6.1(2858) and HREC/13/WMEAD/233 (3778)). The project now has an extensive dataset from leading colonic endoscopic resection centres in Australia on more than 2000 lesions resected over 4 years since September 2008.
These studies have been successful in addressing several aspects of the resection of LSL, resulting in several high profile papers in internationally recognised journals. The collection of this data has produced robust information on the efficacy of the procedure4, recurrence rates, bleeding complications and mortality and costs when compared to surgery. Single centre analysis of the ACE dataset at Westmead has also allowed insights into how to refine the procedure to improve outcomes. The target sign is now a recognised indication for the placement of clips to prevent perforation, CO2 insufflation for EMR has been shown to be superior to air insufflation and succinylated gelatin (Gelofusine®) has been shown to be superior to normal saline as a submucosal lifting agent. Assessment and management strategies for bleeding and deep mural injury or perforation have been derived from analysis of the data. Snare tip soft coagulation of the resection margin post-EMR has been shown to reduce recurrence in a randomised controlled trial. Several ACE study papers have been incorporated into review papers and international guidelines for the safe and effective performance of EMR.
There remain a number of unanswered questions regarding the endoscopic resection of large sessile lesions and a new study incorporating a greater number of endoscopy units around Australia will allow these to be addressed as well as answer questions on the clinical effectiveness of the technique. Enhancing the prediction of submucosal invasive cancer, advanced lesion classification, validation of the assessment of deep injury, treatment of lesion margins post resection to reduce recurrence, prevention and prophylaxis of bleeding, and subtype analyses of the different histological groups of colonic lesions will be examined.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Colonic polyp
Patients referred for EMR of a colonic polyp \>20mm
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to give informed consent to involvement in the clinical study
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Western Sydney Local Health District
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Professor Michael Bourke
Director of Interventional Endoscopy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Westmead Endoscopy Unit
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HREC/16/WMEAD/383(4831)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.