The Australian Colonic Advanced Mucosal Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Study

NCT ID: NCT02000141

Last Updated: 2025-03-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

1281 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To enhance understanding of the risk factors for AMN, improve lesion assessment and prediction of submucosal invasive cancer, improve endoscopic resection efficacy, reduce complications of WF-EMR and improve the understanding of the progression of large lesions to cancer

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Australian Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection study (ACE), is a multicentre prospective observational study which examined WF-EMR of colonic AMN (Ethics approval No. HREC JH/TG 2008/9/6.1(2858)). This project now has an extensive dataset from 8 leading colonic endoscopic resection centres in Australia on more than 1500 lesions resected over 4 years since June 2008.

The ACE study has been successful in addressing several aspects of the resection of AMN, resulting in several high profile papers in internationally recognised journals. The collection of this data has produced robust information on the efficacy of the procedure4, recurrence rates7, bleeding complications8 and mortality when compared to surgery5. Single centre analysis of the ACE dataset at Westmead has also allowed insights into how to refine the procedure to improve outcomes. The target sign is now a recognised indication for the placement of clips to prevent perforation9, CO2 insufflation for WF-EMR has been shown to be superior to air insufflation10 and succinylated gelatin (Gelofusine®) has been shown to be superior to normal saline as a submucosal lifting agent11.

There remain a number of unanswered questions regarding the endoscopic resection of large sessile lesions and expanding the ACE dataset in a new cohort of patients will allow these to be addressed. Enhancing the prediction of submucosal invasive cancer, advanced lesion classification, refinement of the assessment of deep injury, submucosal injectate constituents, the optimum electrosurgical resection methods, prevention and prophylaxis of bleeding, and subtype analyses of the different histological groups comprising AMN will be examined.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonic Polyps

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Advanced Mucosal Lesions

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients referred for endoscopic resection of a large sessile colonic polyp or laterally spreading tumour ≥20mm in size.
* Age \> 18 years
* Able to give informed consent to involvement in the clinical study

Exclusion Criteria

• Unable to provide informed consent for involvement
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Professor Michael Bourke

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Professor Michael Bourke

Director of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Bourke, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

South West Sydney Area Health Service

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Westmead Endoscopy Unit

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gauci JL, Mandarino FV, Kerrison C, Whitfield AM, O'Sullivan T, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Cronin O, Lee EY, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Margin thermal ablation eliminates size as a risk factor for recurrence after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2025 Apr 7;74(5):752-760. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333563.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40044497 (View on PubMed)

Gauci JL, Whitfield A, Medas R, Kerrison C, Mandarino FV, Gibson D, O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Hourigan L, Zanati S, Singh R, Raftopoulos S, Moss A, Brown G, Klein A, Desomer L, Tate DJ, Williams SJ, Lee EY, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Prevalence of Endoscopically Curable Low-Risk Cancer Among Large (>/=20 mm) Nonpedunculated Polyps in the Right Colon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Mar;23(4):555-563.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.07.017. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39089517 (View on PubMed)

Tate DJ, Vosko S, Bar-Yishay I, Desomer L, Shahidi N, Sidhu M, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Incomplete mucosal layer excision during EMR: a potential source of recurrent adenoma (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Sep;100(3):501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Jan 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38280532 (View on PubMed)

Tate DJ, Desomer L, Argenziano ME, Mahajan N, Sidhu M, Vosko S, Shahidi N, Lee E, Williams SJ, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Treatment of adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut. 2023 Oct;72(10):1875-1886. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330300. Epub 2023 Jul 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37414440 (View on PubMed)

O'Sullivan T, Tate D, Sidhu M, Gupta S, Elhindi J, Byth K, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Craciun A, Singh R, Brown G, Raftopoulos S, Hourigan L, Moss A, Klein A, Heitman S, Williams S, Lee E, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. The Surface Morphology of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Polyps Predicts Synchronous Large Lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;21(9):2270-2277.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.034. Epub 2023 Feb 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36787836 (View on PubMed)

Cronin O, Sidhu M, Shahidi N, Gupta S, O'Sullivan T, Whitfield A, Wang H, Kumar P, Hourigan LF, Byth K, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Comparison of the morphology and histopathology of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps in the rectum and colon: implications for endoscopic treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jul;96(1):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35219724 (View on PubMed)

Shaleve Y, Sabo E, Bourke MJ, Klein A. Computerized image analysis of blood vessels within mucosal defects for the prediction of delayed bleeding following colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2021 Aug;53(8):837-841. doi: 10.1055/a-1258-8992. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32898919 (View on PubMed)

Bahin FF, Heitman SJ, Rasouli KN, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Lee EYT, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ. Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1965-1973. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313823. Epub 2017 Oct 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28988198 (View on PubMed)

Burgess NG, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, Brown GJ, Singh R, Williams SJ, Raftopoulos SC, Ormonde D, Moss A, Byth K, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Risk Stratification for Covert Invasive Cancer Among Patients Referred for Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Large Multicenter Cohort. Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep;153(3):732-742.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.047. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28583826 (View on PubMed)

Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. 2017 Oct;66(10):1779-1789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309848. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27464708 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AU RED HREC/13/WMEAD/233

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HREC2013/8/4.5(3778)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Upper GI Outcomes Following EMR
NCT02305290 COMPLETED