Therapeutic Alliance Tensions and Repair in Psychotherapy Practices

NCT ID: NCT03453957

Last Updated: 2022-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

81 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-01

Study Completion Date

2021-08-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates a professional development program intended to improve the relationship or alliance between therapists and patients/clients who are receiving psychotherapy in the community. Half of the participating therapists will receive training to detect and improve alliance with new patients while half will not. The professional development training is expected to improve therapists effectiveness in identifying and correcting alliance tensions which will, in turn, improve therapeutic outcomes for patients/clients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Psychotherapy is the treatment of choice for many mental disorders, yet there is a gap between research and practice. Research indicates that: the therapist-patient alliance is important to reduce patient symptoms, alliance tensions are detrimental to patients, and those therapists who identify and repair alliance tensions can improve patient outcomes. In this study we will use state of the art research to train community-based therapists in evidence-based interventions to identify and repair alliance tensions. Trained therapists and their patients will be compared to therapists who provide usual care to their patients. Improvement in therapists' skills in identifying and repairing alliance tensions and how this is associated with better patient mental health outcomes will be measured. Trained therapists will be interviewed to identify the best ways of improving the training and disseminating the findings to psychotherapists across Canada. Research to improve practicing therapists' ability to identify and repair therapeutic alliance tensions will result in better mental health outcomes for patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Psychotherapy Therapeutic Alliance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This will be a 2-arm, parallel, prospective, single-blind cluster RCT with 1-1 allocation comparing: (a) therapists who receive the professional development intervention to identify and repair alliance tensions at the study outset versus (b) therapists who receive the intervention after participation is complete (no training control). Therapists will be randomized to study condition and patients will be clustered within therapists. Randomization will control for: (a) the effect of therapist variables (age, gender, theoretical orientation, experience, differing initial skill level) on competence, therapeutic alliance, or patient outcomes; (b) potential biases caused by pre-treatment patient variables (symptom severity, co-morbidity, chronicity, psychoactive medications); and (c) treatment or study factors (e.g. frequency of sessions, time to complete the study sessions, treatment received after the study sessions). Patients will be blind to therapist study arm allocation.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participating therapists will be aware of their group (Professional development training vs no training control); however, their participating patient/clients will not know which experimental group their therapists belongs to.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Professional Development Program

Therapists who participate in workshops and consultation sessions with study trainers during study-related therapy sessions and their participating patients/clients.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Professional development program

Intervention Type OTHER

Professional development program consists of training including workshops and consultation sessions to enhance therapists ability to detect and repair alliance ruptures in active community based psychotherapy.

Control

Therapists who did not participate in workshops and consultations sessions while engaging in study-related therapy sessions and their participating patients/clients.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Professional development program

Professional development program consists of training including workshops and consultation sessions to enhance therapists ability to detect and repair alliance ruptures in active community based psychotherapy.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* regulated health professional
* in good standing with a Canadian provincial regulatory college
* scope of practice includes psychotherapy
* ability to add 3 or more new, English speaking clients to caseload over 6 to 9 months
* ability to obtain timely permission to conduct research from therapist's employing institution or health group when applicable


* 18 years of age or older
* will participate in psychotherapy sessions in English
* will see the study-affiliated therapist for a minimum of 6 sessions in the next 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

* none

Patient/Client


* already seeing another therapist
* diagnosed with a neurocognitive disorder
* diagnosed with a psychotic disorder
* expressed suicidal behaviour in the past six months as assessed by their participating therapist
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Ottawa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Giorgio A. Tasca

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giorgio Tasca, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Ottawa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Ottawa

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Mt. Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.pprnet.ca

PPRNet website including study-related information and publications

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

363733

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Women's Depression Treatment Study
NCT00843700 COMPLETED PHASE2