Sex-specific Adaptation to Resistance Training in Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT03440099

Last Updated: 2022-06-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In general, men and women experience differing degrees of age-related decreases in physical function, with women having a greater prevalence of functional limitations and disability. A key predictor of this decrease in functional capacity is the reduction in leg muscle maximal power (product of force and velocity), which can be improved with exercise training. However, the development of exercise interventions to optimally improve skeletal muscle function in older adults has been difficult, in part because we now know that men and women respond differently to the same exercise training stimulus. In fact, the fundamental mechanisms by which habitual exercise improves physical function in older adults are still not well understood. The proposed studies are designed to address these knowledge gaps by examining the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the response to two distinct exercise training paradigms, and determining how these responses differ between older men and women. The investigators hypothesize that molecular, cellular and whole muscle contractile performance will be most improved in men by traditional low-velocity, high-load resistance training, and in women by high-velocity, low-load power training. Moreover, sex-specific structural responses in myofilament remodeling, protein expression and post-translational modifications will explain these sex-specific performance adaptations to each modality. To test these hypotheses, data will be gathered from 50 healthy, sedentary older men and women (65-75 years) prior to and following a 16-week unilateral exercise training program in which one leg undergoes resistance training and the other power training. The Specific Aims of this project are to identify the sex-specific effects of low-velocity resistance training versus high-velocity power training on: Aim 1) skeletal muscle function at the molecular, cellular and whole muscle levels, and Aim 2) protein expression and modification as well as size at the molecular and cellular levels. The within subject, unilateral intervention design provides a powerful model to minimize the effects of between-subject variability, and the translational approach will take advantage of our unique expertise with state-of-the-art measures from the molecular to whole body levels.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biological Aging

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Training

All participants will participate in the 16-week resistance exercise training program.

Group Type OTHER

Resistance exercise training

Intervention Type OTHER

16-week exercise training program, wherein one leg undergoes traditional low-velocity, high-load resistance training and the other leg undergoes high-velocity, low-load power training.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Resistance exercise training

16-week exercise training program, wherein one leg undergoes traditional low-velocity, high-load resistance training and the other leg undergoes high-velocity, low-load power training.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Older adult (65-75 years old) volunteers will be healthy, by self-report, and sedentary, defined as no formal exercise program for the year prior to evaluation and \< 2 sessions (30 min or more) of volitional exercise per week. Volunteers will be ambulatory without the use of walking aids and living independently in the community. All participants will be required to obtain a physician's consent to participate in the study, due to the exercise component, as is common practice in the Department of Kinesiology.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of major neurological or neuromuscular condition that may impact physical function, including cerebrovascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, neurodegenerative disease, demyelinating disease, cerebellar or extrapyramidal disease, etc.
* History of myocardial infarction, angina, peripheral vascular disease, surgical or percutaneous coronary artery revascularization
* History of severe pulmonary disease (i.e., dyspnea that limits activities of daily living such as household ambulation and self-care)
* History of rheumatoid arthritis
* History of diabetes or other metabolic disease that may impact neuromuscular function
* Uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure \> 140/90)
* History of smoking in the past 1 year
* Moderate to severe lower extremity arthritis or pain (i.e., pain on level walking or that limits activities of daily living such as household ambulation and self-care)
* Pain, muscle cramps, joint stiffness, dyspnea, angina, light-headedness or other symptoms upon exertion
* The use of beta-blockers, sedatives, tranquilizers, or other medication that may impair physical function
* Individuals taking statin medications who report symptoms of muscle pain or myopathy
* Body-mass index \>30 kg·m-2, as increased fat mass may alter single muscle fiber performance (Choi et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 71:557-564, 2016)
* Body-mass index \<18 kg·m-2, as this may be an early sign of frailty
* Must pass the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+, in Appendix)
* Any persons taking anti-coagulant medication or with known coagulapathies will be excluded, due to increased bleeding risk from biopsy procedure
* Participants with a contraindication for magnetic resonance testing, including a pace-maker or other implant
* Women will be postmenopausal, as defined as cessation of menses for at least 12 months prior to study
* Men and women undergoing hormone replacement therapy, because this treatment may circumvent normal age-related declines in sex hormone levels (if taken hormone therapy must have been \> 5 years ago)
* Unintentional weight loss of greater than 2.5 kg during the last 3 months
* Currently participating in or have participated in a weight loss or exercise training program in the last year
* An inability to understand written and spoken English
* An inability to follow instructions, as determined by the investigators during the consenting process
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Vermont

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Massachusetts, Amherst

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark S Miller, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Massachusetts

Amherst, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mark S Miller, PhD

Role: CONTACT

4135774701

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mark S Miller, PhD

Role: primary

413-577-4701

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01AG047245-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

116-1974

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.