0.2% Chx Gel vs Implant Bacterial Contamination

NCT ID: NCT03431766

Last Updated: 2018-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-17

Study Completion Date

2019-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this human randomized, double blind, placebo-control (RDBPC) study is to evaluate the efficacy of a 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel on reducing bacterial load and peri-implant inflammation at implant-abutment interface during the early healing stage.Thirty-six healthy patients (mean age 52,28 years; range 29-75 years) without a significant past medical anamnesis, all non-smokers, will be recruited as candidates for single implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation.Patients will be randomly divided in group A (control) and group B (test) as indicated by the randomization chart. All Implants (Cortex classic, Shalomi, Israel)would be inserted by two skilled operators who followed a two-stage protocol and placed them according to the manufacturer's instructions.Eventually, all patients will be rehabilitated with a single implant-supported crown. During all the stages either a gel containing 0.20% CHX (Plak ®Gel; Polifarma Wellness Srl, Rome, Italy) or a placebo gel (Placebo, Polifarma Wellness Srl, Rome, Italy) will be used. The two gels are perfectly alike in packaging, color and smell and nobody knew the exact location of placebo or test gel, which will be revealed, only after data collection would be performed, by the person who prepared them. A or B gel will be placed on the internal connection abutments and then a cover screw would be inserted. Finally, the site would be sutured with non-absorbable nylon sutures. Cone Beam Computed Tomography evaluation (CBCT) (VatechIpax 3D PCH-6500, Fort Lee, NJ USA) would be performed both for pre-operative and post-surgical implant placement. Both gels will be given to the patients, according to the protocol, and applied 2 times/day until suture removal after 7 days. Soft tissue biopsies would be performed by means of a circular scalpel (5.5 mm in diameter) at the implant insertion (T0) and after two months of healing (second stage surgery)(T1) to analyze the peri-implant inflammatory infiltrate and the micro-vessel density (MVD) in both groups. All the radiographs taken during the study time points would be analysed to measure the bone resorption after 1 year or on other studt time points.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this human randomized, double blind, placebo-control (RDBPC) study is to evaluate the efficacy of a 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel on reducing bacterial load and peri-implant inflammation at implant-abutment interface during the early healing stage. Thirty-six healthy patients (mean age 52,28 years; range 29-75 years) without a significant past medical anamnesis, all non-smokers, will be recruited as candidates for single implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation.Patients will be randomly divided in group A (control) and group B (test) as indicated by the randomization chart. The randomization of this prospective, randomized-controlled, double blind study was obtained using computer generated random numbers, centralized with sequentially sealed opaque envelopes provided by the study adviser.The surgeon will open the sealed envelope containing the randomized group only after having inserted the implant.During the first evaluation, all subjects will be clinically examined: radiographs, plaque and bleeding scores would be carried out for diagnostic evaluation; then the patients would be scheduled for surgery procedures. All Implants (Cortex classic, Shalomi, Israel) would be inserted by two skilled operators who will follow a two-stage protocol and would place them according to the manufacturer's instructions. Before surgery all the patients would be subject to applications of chlorhexidine digluconate solution 0.2% for 2 minutes to obtain lower bacterial load and local anesthesia would be given with Articaine® (Ubistesin 4% - Espe Dental AG Seefeld, Germany) associated with epinephrine (1:100.000). Eventually, all patients would be rehabilitated with a single implant-supported crown. During all the stages either a gel containing 0.20% CHX (Plak ®Gel; Polifarma Wellness Srl, Rome, Italy) or a placebo gel (Placebo, Polifarma Wellness Srl, Rome, Italy) would be used. The two gels are perfectly alike in packaging, colour and smell and nobody knows the exact location of placebo or test gel, which would be revealed, only after data collection would be performed, by the person who prepared them. A or B gel would be placed on the internal connection abutments and then a cover screw would be inserted. Finally, the site would be sutured with non-absorbable nylon sutures. Cone Beam Computed Tomography evaluation (CBCT) (VatechIpax 3D PCH-6500, Fort Lee, NJ USA) would be performed both for pre-operative and post-surgical implant placement. All patients will recieve antibiotic therapy, 2g/day for 6 days (Augumentin®; Glaxo-Smithkline Beecham, Brentford, UK).The post-operative pain would be controlled with NSAIDs, and oral hygiene instructions would be given. Both gels would be given to the patients, according to the protocol, and applied 2 times/day until suture removal after 7 days. Soft tissue biopsies would be performed by means of a circular scalpel (5.5 mm in diameter) at the implant insertion (T0) and after two months of healing (second stage surgery)(T1) to analyze the peri-implant inflammatory infiltrate and the micro-vessel density (MVD) in both groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Resorption Bacteria Caused Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group A

on this group a placebo gel will be applied on the internal surface of the implant during all the surgical and prosthetic phases of the treatment.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo gel

Intervention Type DEVICE

On control group A once the dental implants are inserted on both mandible or maxilla of the patient placebo (group A) would be applied on the internal surface of the implants on all the surgical or prosthetic phases of the study.

test group B

on this group a 0.20% chlorhexidine gel will be applied on the internal surface of the implant during all the surgical and prosthetic phases of the treatment described on the study protocol.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

0.20% chlorhexidine gel

Intervention Type DEVICE

On test group B once the dental implants are inserted on both mandible or maxilla of the patient a 0.20% chlorhexidine gel would be applied on the internal surface of the implants on all the surgical or prosthetic phases of the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

placebo gel

On control group A once the dental implants are inserted on both mandible or maxilla of the patient placebo (group A) would be applied on the internal surface of the implants on all the surgical or prosthetic phases of the study.

Intervention Type DEVICE

0.20% chlorhexidine gel

On test group B once the dental implants are inserted on both mandible or maxilla of the patient a 0.20% chlorhexidine gel would be applied on the internal surface of the implants on all the surgical or prosthetic phases of the study.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients of both sex between 18 and 75 years,
* good systemic and oral health,
* need of single crown implant supported restoration,
* at least six months of healing after tooth extraction,
* cortical bone thickness \> 5 mm measured by means of a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Exclusion Criteria

* poor oral hygiene,
* active periodontal disease or other oral disorders,
* insufficient bone thickness for implant insertion,
* bone augmentation procedures,
* immediate loading protocols,
* uncontrolled diabetes mellitus,
* immune diseases,
* smoking
* bruxism.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

G. d'Annunzio University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michele Paolantonio

full time professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sergio caputi, MD, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

g. d'annunzio chieti-pescara university

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

G. d'Annunzio University

Chieti, CH, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

bruna sinjari, dds, phd

Role: CONTACT

+393927471479

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

sergio caputi, MD; DDS

Role: primary

+393927471479

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sinjari B, D'Addazio G, De Tullio I, Traini T, Caputi S. Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo-A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Oct 16;2018:5326340. doi: 10.1155/2018/5326340. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30410934 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2342

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dental Implants and Mouth Rinse
NCT02002442 COMPLETED PHASE2