Reverse Shoulder Replacement: Formal vs. Home Physiotherapy
NCT ID: NCT03430167
Last Updated: 2023-03-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-29
2023-01-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Home Exercise vs PT for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
NCT03719859
Physical Therapy After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
NCT03547726
Shoulder Surgery Traditional vs Accelerated Rehabilitation Trial
NCT03913611
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Data Analysis on Patients Undergoing Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
NCT03617107
Early Versus Delayed Rehabilitation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture
NCT06869343
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Demographic information, health history related to the affected shoulder, and co-morbidity data will also be collected preoperatively.
Patients will be randomized to either a simple, standardized home exercise program or a supervised physiotherapy program administered by a physical therapist after undergoing a standardized operative protocol for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Post-operative range of motion will be measured in a blinded fashion at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. A blinded observer will simultaneously measure validated functional outcomes scores including the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score and Visual Analogue Score for pain pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-operatively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I - Formal Therapy
Supervised physical therapy will be ordered 2 times/week initially for 6 weeks and then tailored to a minimum of 1 visit/week based upon the individual progress of each patient. Home exercises will be provided to the patient by the therapist to be performed daily. Supervised physical therapy will be discontinued once the patient demonstrates independence with the final phase of rehabilitation, which represents the graduated strengthening program.
formal therapy
Patients will be sent to physical therapist for formal treatment to regain range of motion and strengthening exercises
Group II - Home Therapy
In the study group all patients will be instructed in a standardized fashion regarding a home exercise program. This program will involve a standardized a set of five exercises. These exercises will be reviewed with patients in clinic in a standardized fashion and patients will be provided with an instructive hand-out.
home therapy
Patients will be given a set of instructions for completing home therapy for range of motion and strengthening
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
home therapy
Patients will be given a set of instructions for completing home therapy for range of motion and strengthening
formal therapy
Patients will be sent to physical therapist for formal treatment to regain range of motion and strengthening exercises
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. A pre-operative plan for RTSA
3. Age \>60
Exclusion Criteria
2. Incompetent deltoid muscle
3. Unwillingness or inability to participate in a home exercise program
4. Medically unfit for operative intervention
5. Revision RTSA
6. RTSA for glenohumeral osteoarthritis or proximal humerus fracture
7. Unwillingness to participate in the study
8. Inability to read or comprehend written instructions
61 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aaron Chamberlain, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Utah - Orthopedics
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2249-54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01994.
Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S, Craig EV, Gulotta LV. National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
Lawrence TM, Ahmadi S, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Patient reported activities after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: part II. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Nov;21(11):1464-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.012. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
Young SW, Zhu M, Walker CG, Poon PC. Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those of hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of cuff-tear arthropathy: a matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 15;95(10):910-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00302.
Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1742-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00851.
Mulieri P, Dunning P, Klein S, Pupello D, Frankle M. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2544-56. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00912.
Steen BM, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Hussey MM, Cusick MC, Kumar AG, Frankle MA. Outcome and value of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a matched cohort. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1433-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
Wall B, Nove-Josserand L, O'Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1476-85. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00666.
Favard L, Levigne C, Nerot C, Gerber C, De Wilde L, Mole D. Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2469-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1833-y.
Kiet TK, Feeley BT, Naimark M, Gajiu T, Hall SL, Chung TT, Ma CB. Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Feb;24(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.039. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ. The reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):535-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22450.
Levy JC, Badman B. Reverse shoulder prosthesis for acute four-part fracture: tuberosity fixation using a horseshoe graft. J Orthop Trauma. 2011 May;25(5):318-24. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f22088.
Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M. The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1697-705. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02813.
Chalmers PN, Slikker W 3rd, Mall NA, Gupta AK, Rahman Z, Enriquez D, Nicholson GP. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Feb;23(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.044. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
Cvetanovich GL, Chalmers PN, Streit JJ, Romeo AA, Nicholson GP. Patients Undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty on the Dominant Extremity Attain Greater Postoperative ROM. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Oct;473(10):3221-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4400-0. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
Levy JC, Everding NG, Gil CC Jr, Stephens S, Giveans MR. Speed of recovery after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1872-1881. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
Young AA, Smith MM, Bacle G, Moraga C, Walch G. Early results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 19;93(20):1915-23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00300.
Hattrup SJ, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Reverse shoulder replacement for patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1888-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jun 30.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
Charlson ME, Sax FL, MacKenzie CR, Braham RL, Fields SD, Douglas RG Jr. Morbidity during hospitalization: can we predict it? J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(7):705-12. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90107-x.
Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 1999 Sep;14(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90232-2.
Kappe T, Cakir B, Reichel H, Elsharkawi M. Reliability of radiologic classification for cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jun;20(4):543-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):388-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14024.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201703024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.