A Mobile Health App to Reduce Sedentary Time in Inactive Employees
NCT ID: NCT03403270
Last Updated: 2018-01-18
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
UNKNOWN
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
300 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2018-01-31
Study Completion Date
2019-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The ENCOURAGE App will use mobile health technology to support employees to reduce their sedentary time and become more physically active. The mobile app has been developed using time management techniques (i.e. Pomodoro technique) as a strategy to provide prompts to encourage users to engage in an activity and break up bouts of prolonged sitting.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Combined HAPA and mHealth Intervention to Increase Non-Sedentary Behaviours in Office-Working Adults
NCT03461926
Sedentary Lifestyle
Health Behaviour Change
COMPLETED
NA
A stAPP to a Healthier Lifestyle
NCT01975870
Sedentary Lifestyle
COMPLETED
NA
Stand Up for Your Health: The Up Project
NCT05844267
Sedentary Behavior
COMPLETED
NA
Point-of-Choice Prompts to Reduce Prolonged Sitting Time at Work
NCT01628861
Adult Office Workers
COMPLETED
PHASE1
mHealth Biometrics for Sedentary People (MotivateLJMU)
NCT04979702
Healthy
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sixty percent of Canadian adults are accessible through the workplace. Thus, workplace wellness programs that include physical activity components provide a viable option to encourage employees to reduce sedentary time. Moving forward with the ENCOURAGE health promotion model, we will use mobile health technology to support employees to reduce sitting and become more physically active, while offering employers a solution that can be easily implemented in a variety of contexts.
The public release of the ENCOURAGE App will involve two phases:
1. The recruitment of up to 300 individuals through the App. Any user will be able to download the ENCOURAGE App through the iTunes Store or Google Play. Note that when participants download the App, they are not automatically enrolled in the study. Participants will be prompted, after downloading the App, with a brief description of the study, as well as a pre-screening tool that will be used to determine eligibility. Users will be asked via a pop-up to determine if they wish to participate in a research project. Users will be asked to participate in a time series quasi-experimental study to determine if the ENCOURAGE App can support participants to increase the number of breaks in sedentary time taken throughout the day, over a 6-month time period. The App can be customized by the users to set prompts at intervals that fit into their schedule. For example, these activities can range from a stretching activity (e.g., a neck stretch), a standing activity (e.g., stand and read), or a physical activity (e.g., fill up the printer with paper, do a squat). Additionally, the App will use Behaviour Change Techniques as a strategy to support participants as they reduce their sedentary behaviour and increase their physical activity levels.
2. The recruitment of a sub-sample of 60 participants who live in Winnipeg, MB which will be drawn from the larger sample. In addition to completing all the components of the larger research study, the sub-sample will be also asked to wear a physical activity monitor, called an accelerometer.
The objectives of this study are to determine if the final product ENCOURAGE App:
1. Reduces the number of breaks from sitting;
2. Reduces total sedentary time;
3. Increases physical activity levels; and,
4. Improves self-efficacy for reducing sedentary behaviour.
The public release of the ENCOURAGE App will involve two phases:
1. The recruitment of up to 300 individuals through the App. Any user will be able to download the ENCOURAGE App through the iTunes Store or Google Play. Note that when participants download the App, they are not automatically enrolled in the study. Participants will be prompted, after downloading the App, with a brief description of the study, as well as a pre-screening tool that will be used to determine eligibility. Users will be asked via a pop-up to determine if they wish to participate in a research project. Users will be asked to participate in a time series quasi-experimental study to determine if the ENCOURAGE App can support participants to increase the number of breaks in sedentary time taken throughout the day, over a 6-month time period. The App can be customized by the users to set prompts at intervals that fit into their schedule. For example, these activities can range from a stretching activity (e.g., a neck stretch), a standing activity (e.g., stand and read), or a physical activity (e.g., fill up the printer with paper, do a squat). Additionally, the App will use Behaviour Change Techniques as a strategy to support participants as they reduce their sedentary behaviour and increase their physical activity levels.
2. The recruitment of a sub-sample of 60 participants who live in Winnipeg, MB which will be drawn from the larger sample. In addition to completing all the components of the larger research study, the sub-sample will be also asked to wear a physical activity monitor, called an accelerometer.
The objectives of this study are to determine if the final product ENCOURAGE App:
1. Reduces the number of breaks from sitting;
2. Reduces total sedentary time;
3. Increases physical activity levels; and,
4. Improves self-efficacy for reducing sedentary behaviour.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Physical Activity
Sedentary Lifestyle
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NA
Intervention Model
SINGLE_GROUP
Time Series Quasi-Experiment
Primary Study Purpose
PREVENTION
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Outcome Assessors will not be aware of previous research data collected. As this is a single group study, all participants will receive the intervention as described.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ENCOURAGE App Intervention
Users will download the ENCOURAGE mobile app. The App uses a time management technique (i.e. Pomodoro technique) as a strategy to provide prompts for users to engage in an activity. The App can be customized by the users to set prompts at intervals that fit into their schedule. For example, these activities can range from a stretching activity (e.g., a neck stretch), a standing activity (e.g., stand and read), or a physical activity (e.g., fill up the printer with paper, do a squat). Additionally, the App will use Behaviour Change Techniques as a strategy to support participants as they reduce their sedentary behaviour and improve their physical activity levels. The App uses a series of Behavior Change Techniques shown to be effective in promoting a more active lifestyle.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
ENCOURAGE App
Intervention Type
OTHER
Users will have an opportunity to engage with the app as described for the duration of the study period.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ENCOURAGE App
Users will have an opportunity to engage with the app as described for the duration of the study period.
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
-Specific to sub-sample of 60 participants; live in Winnipeg, MB
Exclusion Criteria
* Individuals who do not own a personal mobile phone
* Any physical limitations that would not allow individual to engage in physical activity
* Any cognitive limitations that would not allow individual to consent for study
* Specific to sub-sample of 60 participants; live outside Winnipeg, MB
* Any physical limitations that would not allow individual to engage in physical activity
* Any cognitive limitations that would not allow individual to consent for study
* Specific to sub-sample of 60 participants; live outside Winnipeg, MB
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
70 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Heart and Stroke Foundation Manitoba
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Tactica Interactive Winnipeg
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
St. Boniface Hospital
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St-Boniface Hospital Albrechtsen Research Center
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Canada
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Dunstan DW. Screen-based entertainment time, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events: population-based study with ongoing mortality and hospital events follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jan 18;57(3):292-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.065.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dunstan DW, Barr EL, Healy GN, Salmon J, Shaw JE, Balkau B, Magliano DJ, Cameron AJ, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation. 2010 Jan 26;121(3):384-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894824. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, Davies MJ, Gorely T, Gray LJ, Khunti K, Yates T, Biddle SJ. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012 Nov;55(11):2895-905. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2677-z. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.004.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Proper KI, Singh AS, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Feb;40(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
van Uffelen JG, Wong J, Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Riphagen I, Gilson ND, Burton NW, Healy GN, Thorp AA, Clark BK, Gardiner PA, Dunstan DW, Bauman A, Owen N, Brown WJ. Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):379-88. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.024.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2011 Mar;22(1):7-14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Thorp AA, Healy GN, Winkler E, Clark BK, Gardiner PA, Owen N, Dunstan DW. Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: a cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Oct 26;9:128. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-128.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tew GA, Posso MC, Arundel CE, McDaid CM. Systematic review: height-adjustable workstations to reduce sedentary behaviour in office-based workers. Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Jul;65(5):357-66. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv044. Epub 2015 May 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Neuhaus M, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Eakin EG. Workplace sitting and height-adjustable workstations: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.009.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Evans RE, Fawole HO, Sheriff SA, Dall PM, Grant PM, Ryan CG. Point-of-choice prompts to reduce sitting time at work: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.010.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shrestha N, Kukkonen-Harjula KT, Verbeek JH, Ijaz S, Hermans V, Bhaumik S. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Verweij LM, Proper KI, Weel AN, Hulshof CT, van Mechelen W. The application of an occupational health guideline reduces sedentary behaviour and increases fruit intake at work: results from an RCT. Occup Environ Med. 2012 Jul;69(7):500-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100377. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Allen JC, Lewis JB, Tagliaferro AR. Cost-effectiveness of health risk reduction after lifestyle education in the small workplace. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E96. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.110169. Epub 2012 May 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, Patel V, Haines A. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hurling R, Catt M, Boni MD, Fairley BW, Hurst T, Murray P, Richardson A, Sodhi JS. Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007 Apr 27;9(2):e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Stephens J, Allen J. Mobile phone interventions to increase physical activity and reduce weight: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):320-9. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318250a3e7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fanning J, Mullen SP, McAuley E. Increasing physical activity with mobile devices: a meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 21;14(6):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2171.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, Wood CE. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mohr DC, Cheung K, Schueller SM, Hendricks Brown C, Duan N. Continuous evaluation of evolving behavioral intervention technologies. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Oct;45(4):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.006.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.022.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kumar S, Nilsen WJ, Abernethy A, Atienza A, Patrick K, Pavel M, Riley WT, Shar A, Spring B, Spruijt-Metz D, Hedeker D, Honavar V, Kravitz R, Lefebvre RC, Mohr DC, Murphy SA, Quinn C, Shusterman V, Swendeman D. Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.017.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Williams SL, French DP. What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour--and are they the same? Health Educ Res. 2011 Apr;26(2):308-22. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr005. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, Hrobjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Dore CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Eysenbach G; CONSORT-EHEALTH Group. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, Dombrowski SU, Bishop A, French DP. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health. 2011 Nov;26(11):1479-98. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2010.540664. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pedisic Z, Bennie JA, Timperio AF, Crawford DA, Dunstan DW, Bauman AE, Salmon J. Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ): an assessment of concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 5;14:1249. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1249.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Maclagan LC, Park J, Sanmartin C, Mathur KR, Roth D, Manuel DG, Gershon A, Booth GL, Bhatia S, Atzema CL, Tu JV. The CANHEART health index: a tool for monitoring the cardiovascular health of the Canadian population. CMAJ. 2014 Feb 18;186(3):180-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131358. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Blumenthal JA. Depression and coronary heart disease: association and implications for treatment. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008 Mar;75 Suppl 2:S48-53. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.75.suppl_2.s48.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chau JY, Van Der Ploeg HP, Dunn S, Kurko J, Bauman AE. Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1):118-25. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182251060.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rothney MP, Schaefer EV, Neumann MM, Choi L, Chen KY. Validity of physical activity intensity predictions by ActiGraph, Actical, and RT3 accelerometers. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Aug;16(8):1946-52. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.279. Epub 2008 May 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Colley RC, Tremblay MS. Moderate and vigorous physical activity intensity cut-points for the Actical accelerometer. J Sports Sci. 2011 May;29(8):783-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.557744.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR Jr. Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Sep;36(9):1637-45.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Holmen H, Torbjornsen A, Wahl AK, Jenum AK, Smastuen MC, Arsand E, Ribu L. A Mobile Health Intervention for Self-Management and Lifestyle Change for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 2: One-Year Results From the Norwegian Randomized Controlled Trial RENEWING HEALTH. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Dec 11;2(4):e57. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3882.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kannisto KA, Korhonen J, Adams CE, Koivunen MH, Vahlberg T, Valimaki MA. Factors Associated With Dropout During Recruitment and Follow-Up Periods of a mHealth-Based Randomized Controlled Trial for Mobile.Net to Encourage Treatment Adherence for People With Serious Mental Health Problems. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 21;19(2):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6417.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fukuoka Y, Gay C, Haskell W, Arai S, Vittinghoff E. Identifying Factors Associated With Dropout During Prerandomization Run-in Period From an mHealth Physical Activity Education Study: The mPED Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Apr 13;3(2):e34. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3928.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H2016:228
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
MapTrek for Sedentary Workers
NCT03109535
COMPLETED
NA
A Combined HAPA and mHealth Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in University Students
NCT03760393
COMPLETED
NA
Study of Programm Interest 'Bouge' to Improve the Daily Physical Activity at the Pregnant Women.
NCT03688087
UNKNOWN
NA
Enduring Exercise Habits
NCT03634423
COMPLETED
NA
A Blended Intervention to Promote Physical Activity, Health and Work Productivity Among Office Employees
NCT04391270
COMPLETED
NA
The Role of a Motion Sensor With Accompanying Web Application on Step Counts, Energy Balance, and Metabolic Markers in Nurses
NCT04524572
COMPLETED
NA
Measuring Outcomes With Validated Exercise
NCT07270185
RECRUITING
A Randomized Trial of Economic Incentives to Promote Walking Among Full Time Employees
NCT01855776
COMPLETED
NA
Individualized Motivational Print Materials to Encourage More Physical Activity
NCT00367029
COMPLETED
PHASE3
mHealth Intervention to Promote Cancer Survivors' Physical Activity
NCT02469727
COMPLETED
NA
Tailored Multicomponent Intervention for Remote Physical Activity Promotion in Inactive Adults
NCT02918578
COMPLETED
NA
An mHealth Mobile Application Supporting Maintenance of Physical Activity Among Men and Women With High Blood Pressure
NCT03937674
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluating the Impact of Personalized Move Goals on Physical Activity
NCT05123989
UNKNOWN
NA
Feasibility, Acceptability and the Effects of Two Publicly Available Physical Activity Mobile Apps
NCT03565627
COMPLETED
NA
The Health Action Process Approach and Movement Patterns in Adult Office Workers
NCT03091686
COMPLETED
NA
Applying Mobile Persuasive Technologies to Increase Physical Activity in Women
NCT01280812
COMPLETED
NA
Examining the Impact of a Self-compassion Intervention on Physical Activity Behaviour Among People With Prediabetes
NCT04863235
UNKNOWN
NA
A Smartphone-based Intervention to Promote an Active Lifestyle in Low Educated Working Young Adults
NCT02948803
COMPLETED
NA
Effects of an mHealth Intervention to Improve Health Behaviors Among Sedentary Workers
NCT04347096
COMPLETED
NA
Incentivizing Physical Activity Using Gamification, A Pilot Study
NCT02850614
COMPLETED
NA
Intervention to Support Participation in Regular Exercise in the Elderly (INSPIRE)
NCT02464254
UNKNOWN
NA
Efficacy of a Combined Ergonomic Health Promotion Intervention on Employee Health
NCT02071420
COMPLETED
NA
Increasing Physical Activity Among Early Career Professionals: A Feasibility Trial of an Online Intervention
NCT05557071
COMPLETED
NA
Increasing Workplace Physical Activity in Sedentary Office Workers
NCT01846013
COMPLETED
NA
Investigating Two Prototype Mobile App Interventions to Increase Physical Activity
NCT06372275
COMPLETED
NA