The LOOP Trial in Treatment of Skin Abscesses

NCT ID: NCT03398746

Last Updated: 2018-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

217 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-22

Study Completion Date

2012-11-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled a convenience sample of adults and children presenting to two Level 1 trauma centers over 12-months with subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage. Two methods of drainage were compared: 1) the LOOP technique or 2) standard packing technique.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled a convenience sample of adults and children presenting to two Level 1 trauma centers over 12-months with subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage. Patients were excluded if the abscess was on the hand, foot, or face or if it required admission or operative intervention. Patients were followed over 10 days to determine the primary outcome of treatment failure defined by need for admission, IV antibiotics, or repeat drainage within 10-day follow-up. The secondary outcomes included ease of procedure, ease of care, pain after insertion and patient satisfaction using a 10-point numeric rating.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abscess

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LOOP Technique

Placement of subcutaneous loop drain

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LOOP Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placement of subcutaneous loop drain

Incision and Drainage

Standard Incision and Drainage Technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard incision and drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Incise and drain with placement of packing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LOOP Technique

Placement of subcutaneous loop drain

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard incision and drainage

Incise and drain with placement of packing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage

Exclusion Criteria

* Abscess was on the hand, foot, or face
* Requiring admission or operative intervention
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Orlando Regional Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jay Ladde

Associate Program Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ladde JG, Baker S, Rodgers CN, Papa L. The LOOP technique: a novel incision and drainage technique in the treatment of skin abscesses in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;33(2):271-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25435407 (View on PubMed)

Ladde J, Baker S, Lilburn N, Wan M, Papa L. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Novel Loop Drainage Technique Versus Standard Incision and Drainage in the Treatment of Skin Abscesses. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(12):1229-1240. doi: 10.1111/acem.14106. Epub 2020 Oct 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32770686 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09.005.01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Abscess Aspiration
NCT04127071 UNKNOWN NA