Comparison of Loop and Primary Incision&Drainage Techniques in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT02286479

Last Updated: 2016-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Skin abscesses are among the most common soft tissue infections cause emergency room visits frequently. Management of abscess drainage and prevent further complications are important entities for emergency physicians. Historically primary incision and drainage (I\&D) technique has found very effective method of abscess drainage, however a novel technique loop drainage holds promising. The purpose of our study is comparison efficacy of I\&D and loop drainage techniques in patients with cutaneous abscess.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Skin Abscess

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Incision and Drainage

In the incision and drainage group, the abscesses are incised, irrigated by sterile solutions and drained conventionally.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Incision and Drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the incision and drainage group, the abscesses are incised, irrigated by sterile solutions and drained conventionally.

Loop drainage

In the loop drainage group, two small incision are made on each side of abscess. The pus are drained and septations are seperated by a forceps. Abscess cavitary irrigated by sterile solution. Sterile, non-powder, non-latex surgical gloves cuff is inserted in one incision and taken out from the other insicion. Then two tips of cuff are tied loosely.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Loop drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the loop drainage group, two small incision are made on each side of abscess. The pus are drained and septations are seperated by a forceps. Abscess cavitary irrigated by sterile solution. Sterile, non-powder, non-latex surgical gloves cuff is inserted in one incision and taken out from the other insicion. Then two tips of cuff are tied loosely.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Incision and Drainage

In the incision and drainage group, the abscesses are incised, irrigated by sterile solutions and drained conventionally.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Loop drainage

In the loop drainage group, two small incision are made on each side of abscess. The pus are drained and septations are seperated by a forceps. Abscess cavitary irrigated by sterile solution. Sterile, non-powder, non-latex surgical gloves cuff is inserted in one incision and taken out from the other insicion. Then two tips of cuff are tied loosely.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients presenting to Kocaeli University Emergency Department with cutaneous abscess.
* Providing written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Under 18 years of age.
* Immunosuppressive patients.
* Using medications have effects on wound healing.
* Abscess is not recognizable by bedside ultrasound.
* Lidocaine allergy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kocaeli University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ibrahim Ulas Ozturan

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kocaeli University Medical Faculty Emergency Medicine Department

Kocaeli, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ozturan IU, Dogan NO, Karakayali O, Ozbek AE, Yilmaz S, Pekdemir M, Suner S. Comparison of loop and primary incision & drainage techniques in adult patients with cutaneous abscess: A preliminary, randomized clinical trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;35(6):830-834. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.036. Epub 2017 Jan 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28162873 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KOU KAEK 2014/259

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Abscess Aspiration
NCT04127071 UNKNOWN NA
HS ABSCESSES: I&D VS PUNCH DEBRIDEMENT
NCT06731309 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Vacuum Assisted Closure in Neck Abscess
NCT02102685 COMPLETED PHASE3