Comparison of Recurrence Rate of 2 Herniotomy Techniques in Children Older Than 2 Years

NCT ID: NCT03392636

Last Updated: 2019-08-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

260 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-11

Study Completion Date

2018-07-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

the study is basically aimed at comparing two techniques of herniotomy by comparing there recurrence rates

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

in this study, the principal investigator will operate upon patients aged between 2 years and 12 years by two techniques. in technique called mitchell banks technique, inguinal canal will not be opened and in Fergusson gross technique, it will be opened

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hernia, Inguinal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Group A will get Mitchell Banks herniotomy done and Group B will get Fergusson Gross Herniotomy done.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Mitchell Banks Herniotomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Herniotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In Mitchell Banks Herniotomy, one of investigators will do herniotomy without opening inguinal canal and in Ferguson Gross Herniotomy , one of investigators will do herniotmy by opening inguinal canal.

Group B

Fergusson Gross Herniotomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Herniotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In Mitchell Banks Herniotomy, one of investigators will do herniotomy without opening inguinal canal and in Ferguson Gross Herniotomy , one of investigators will do herniotmy by opening inguinal canal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Herniotomy

In Mitchell Banks Herniotomy, one of investigators will do herniotomy without opening inguinal canal and in Ferguson Gross Herniotomy , one of investigators will do herniotmy by opening inguinal canal.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Mitchell Banks Herniotomy Fergusson Gross Herniotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All pediatric patients of either gender above age of 2 years and below 14 years of age presenting in pediatric surgery Mayo hospital lahore

Exclusion Criteria

* sliding hernia strangulated hernia pts with connective tissue disorders pts with undesccended testis patients with hydrocele hernia with internal ring 2cm or more in size
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

13 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King Edward Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fatima Numeri

assisstant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

KEMU

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

212/RC/KEMU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.