Reusable Flexible Bronchoscopes Versus Single Use Bronchoscopes : a Satisfaction Survey
NCT ID: NCT03392610
Last Updated: 2018-07-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-10-01
2019-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the quality of FB during procedures carried out with each of the two solutions in intensive care unit (ICU), respiratory endoscopy (RE) and anesthesia (A) department.
A prospective non-interventional and non-randomized monocentric study compare the operator satisfaction of therapeutic procedures performed with RU FB (EB FujifilmTM range, FB/FI PentaxMedicalTM range, StorzTM intubation FB) versus disposable FB (aScope 3® and aScope 4® (AmbuTM), Broncoflex® (AxessvisionTM). An evaluation form is completed by the operator at the end of procedure. Judging criteria, rated from 0 to 10, concern handling, ergonomics, image and suction quality.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevalence and Characteristics of Patients With Bronchiectasis Comorbid Nontuberculous Mycobacteria
NCT03594032
Role of Bronchoscopy in Bronchiectasis
NCT04208607
Mortality in Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
NCT01792427
Bronchiectasis Effect in COPD Patients
NCT03670940
Bronchoscopy Registry
NCT02741089
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bronchial endoscopy
Compare quality procedures performed with reusable versus disposable bronchoscopes in respiratory endoscopy unit
No interventions assigned to this group
Critical care unit
Compare quality procedures performed with reusable versus disposable bronchoscopes in critical care unit
No interventions assigned to this group
Anesthesia department
Compare quality procedures performed with reusable versus disposable bronchoscopes in anesthesia department
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient followed or treated at the Limoges University Hospital
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnostic bronchoscopy
* Interventional bronchoscopy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Limoges
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University hospital, Limoges
Limoges, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
valentin david
Role: primary
thomas daix
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
I17023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.