Non-Contact Intraoperative Optical Imaging During Instrumentation Procedure
NCT ID: NCT03391024
Last Updated: 2018-01-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-24
2015-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-contact Intraoperative Optical Imaging During Neurosurgical Procedures
NCT03391011
Non-contact Intraoperative Optical Imaging During Spinal Procedures
NCT03391089
Patient Specific Virtual Reality for Simulation of Spine Procedures: an Intelligent Image Segmentation, Registration and 3-dimensional Visualization in a Unified Virtual Reality Workflow for Image Guided Therapy, and Education - Physician Testing
NCT06714539
Effectiveness of Vibration and Standing Versus Standing Alone for the Treatment of Osteoporosis for People With Spinal Cord Injury.
NCT00150683
Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Real-World Functional Activity
NCT05611775
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BBL Experimental Navigation System
As this is a single arm trial, all participants receive treatment.
BBL Experimental Navigation System
Comparison of accuracy of screw placement using experimental system while navigated with clinically approved system.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BBL Experimental Navigation System
Comparison of accuracy of screw placement using experimental system while navigated with clinically approved system.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to provide consent, or have substitute decision maker available FOR SPINAL INDICATIONS
* Scheduled to undergo spinal instrumentation surgery involving pedicle screw insertion
* Scheduled for pre-operative CT scan and the surgical plan includes open exposure of the posterior bony elements of one or more level(s) of the vertebra(e)
* No contra-indication for a post-operative CT scan FOR CRANIAL INDICATIONS
* scheduled to undergo cranial surgery
* Scheduled for pre-operative CT or MRI scan
* No contra-indication for post-operative CT scan
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous spinal decompression with laminoplasty performed at the level intended for instrumentation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Victor Yang
Senior Scientist, Physical Sciences Platform
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Victor XD Yang, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Merloz P, Tonetti J, Eld A, et al, Computer-assisted versus manual spine surgery: Clinical report, Springer Berlin, 1997.
Rampersaud YR, Simon DA, Foley KT. Accuracy requirements for image-guided spinal pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Feb 15;26(4):352-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200102150-00010.
Zdichavsky M, Blauth M, Knop C, Graessner M, Herrmann H, Krettek C, Bastian L, Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Thoracic Spine Fractures, European Journal of Trauma, 30:234-240, 2004
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
177-2013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.