Sulopenem Followed by Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ertapenem Followed by Cipro for Complicated UTI in Adults

NCT ID: NCT03357614

Last Updated: 2020-12-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1395 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-18

Study Completion Date

2019-12-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy study to compare the efficacy and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) in adults.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sulopenem

Sulopenem 1000 mg IV once daily for a minimum of 5 days, followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid 500 mg PO twice daily to complete 7-10 total days of treatment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sulopenem

Intervention Type DRUG

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid

Intervention Type DRUG

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Ertapenem

Ertapenem 1000 mg IV once daily for a minimum of 5 days, followed by ciprofloxacin 500 mg PO twice daily or amoxicillin-clavulanate 500 mg PO twice daily to complete 7-10 total days of treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ertapenem

Intervention Type DRUG

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Ciprofloxacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Amoxicillin-clavulanate

Intervention Type DRUG

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sulopenem

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Intervention Type DRUG

Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Intervention Type DRUG

Ertapenem

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Intervention Type DRUG

Ciprofloxacin

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Intervention Type DRUG

Amoxicillin-clavulanate

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Invanz Cipro Augmentin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults ≥18 years of age with more than 24 hours of urinary symptoms attributable to a UTI
2. Able to provide informed consent
3. Clinically documented pyelonephritis or complicated urinary tract infection:

1. Pyelonephritis with normal anatomy
2. Complicated UTI as defined by one or more of the following factors:

i. The presence of an indwelling catheter ii. \>100 mL of residual urine after voiding iii. Neurogenic bladder iv. Obstructive uropathy due to nephrolithiasis, tumor or fibrosis v. Azotemia due to intrinsic renal disease vi. Urinary retention in men possibly due to benign prostatic hypertrophy vii. Surgically modified or abnormal urinary tract anatomy
4. At least two of the following signs or symptoms:

1. Rigors, chills or fever/hypothermia
2. Flank pain or pelvic pain
3. Nausea or vomiting
4. Dysuria, urinary frequency or urinary urgency
5. Costovertebral angle tenderness on physical examination
5. A mid-stream urine specimen with:

1. a dipstick analysis positive for nitrite AND
2. evidence of pyuria as defined by either: i. a dipstick analysis positive for leukocyte esterase AND/OR ii. at least 10 white blood cells per cubic millimeter on microscopic analysis of unspun urine AND/OR iii. White blood cell count ≥10 cells/high-powered field in urine sediment

Exclusion Criteria

1. Receipt of effective antibacterial drug therapy for complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) for a continuous duration of more than 24 hours during the previous 72 hours. Patients who have objective documentation of clinical progression of cUTI while on antibacterial drug therapy, or patients who received antibacterial drugs for surgical prophylaxis and then develop cUTI, may be appropriate for enrollment.
2. Subjects with an organism isolated from the urine within the last year known to be resistant to ertapenem
3. Severe structural or functional urinary tract abnormality responsible for an intractable infection which in the opinion of the investigator would require \> 10 days of therapy or post-treatment prophylaxis (eg. patients with chronic vesiculo-ureteral reflux).
4. Uncomplicated UTI
5. Patients with paraplegia/quadriplegia
6. Hypotension with systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg
7. Complicated UTI associated with complete obstruction, emphysematous pyelonephritis, known or suspected renal or perinephric abscess or expected to require surgical intervention (not placement of catheters) to achieve cure
8. Patients with a known history of myasthenia gravis
9. Patients who require concomitant administration of tizanidine or valproic acid
10. Patients with a history of allergy to carbapenems or quinolones or amoxicillin-clavulanate or other beta-lactams, or hypersensitivity to probenecid
11. Renal transplantation
12. Patients requiring dialysis
13. Acute or chronic prostatitis
14. High risk for cUTI caused by Pseudomonas sp. (eg,. history of prior UTI due to Pseudomonas species, recent steroid use, others)
15. Chronic indwelling catheters or stents
16. Ileal loops or vesico-urethral reflux
17. Recent trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract within the prior 30 days
18. History of seizures
19. Patients with a history of blood dyscrasias
20. Patients with a history of uric acid kidney stones
21. Patients with acute gouty attack
22. Patients on chronic methotrexate therapy
23. Females of child-bearing potential who are unable to take adequate contraceptive precautions, have a positive pregnancy test result within 24 hours of study entry, are otherwise known to be pregnant, or are currently breastfeeding an infant.
24. Male subjects must agree to use of an effective barrier method of contraception during the study and for 14 days post treatment
25. Patients known to have a history of liver or kidney disease or neutropenia as defined by the following baseline laboratory criteria:

* Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 3 X Upper Limit of Normal
* Total bilirubin \> 2 X Upper Limit of Normal
* Neutropenia (\<1000 cells/mm3)
26. Patients participating in any other clinical study that involved the administration of an investigational medication
27. Patient immunocompromised
28. Patients unlikely to comply with the protocol
29. Patients considered unlikely to survive the 4-week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical Facility

Bellflower, California, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

La Palma, California, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Medical Facility

Kohtla-Järve, , Estonia

Site Status

Medical Facility

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Medical Facility

Võru, , Estonia

Site Status

Medical Facility

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Medical Facility

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Medical Facility

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Medical Facility

Baja, , Hungary

Site Status

Medical Facility

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Medical Facility

Nagykanizsa, , Hungary

Site Status

Medical Facility

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Medical Facility

Szentes, , Hungary

Site Status

Medical Facility

Tatabánya, , Hungary

Site Status

Medical Facility

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Medical Facility

Liepāja, , Latvia

Site Status

Medical Facility

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Medical Facility

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Medical Facility

Valmiera, , Latvia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Estonia Georgia Hungary Latvia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dunne MW, Aronin SI, Das AF, Akinapelli K, Breen J, Zelasky MT, Puttagunta S. Sulopenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Including Pyelonephritis: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;76(1):78-88. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac704.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36068705 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IT001-302

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id