Yale Swallow Protocol in Extubated Patients

NCT ID: NCT03352908

Last Updated: 2021-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

166 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-25

Study Completion Date

2020-10-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if the Yale Swallow Protocol is an effective screen for aspiration in recently extubated patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dysphagia is prevalent in recently extubated patients with estimates ranging from 29-84% of recently extubated patients having some form of dysphagia with elevated risk for silent aspiration.One challenge providers face when managing post extubation dysphagia (PED) is that there are no best practice guidelines on how to evaluate for PED, specifically how to evaluate for silent aspiration (aspiration without cough response).

One method that has been suggested is the Yale Swallow Protocol (YSP), a pass/fail screen for aspiration consisting of a three ounce water challenge as well as a brief cognitive screen and oral motor exam. The assumption of the YSP is that silent aspiration (aspiration without a cough response) is volume dependent. This is based on a study of over 4000 patients that underwent both a FEES (5mL puree and 5mL liquid boluses) and a 3oz water challenge. Results from previous literature indicated that the 3oz water swallow had a high sensitivity for detecting aspiration (98%). This was again studied with a double blind research design with 25 patients, comparing results of the 3oz water challenge with results of videofluoroscopic swallow study. This showed 100% sensitivity for detecting aspiration, 64% specificity, 78% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. However, no published study has evaluated the YSP in recently extubated patients and so it is unclear if the high sensitivity and specificity would be retained. Investigators aim to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Yale Swallow Protocol in identifying aspiration in recently extubated patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dysphagia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

YSP

The Yale Swallow Protocol (YSP) consists of a brief cognitive screen, a brief oral motor exam, and a 3oz water challenge (subjects instructed to drink 3oz of water without stopping). Pass/fail is determined based on the subjects ability to drink the 3oz of water uninterrupted without immediate cough.

No interventions assigned to this group

FEES

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) uses a flexible endoscope that will be passed transnasally into the pharynx by a speech pathologist specializing in dysphagia management. FEES will be treated as a placebo comparator.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Intubation greater than 24 hours
2. Age 18 and older
3. All races
4. Males and females
5. English speaking
6. Swallow consult ordered by the team within 48 hours of extubation

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known history of oropharyngeal dysphagia
2. Contraindication for FEES due to facial fractures, nothing by mouth (NPO) status for other procedures, elevated bleeding risk, reduced level of alertness, or significant agitation.
3. Allergy to dairy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stevie J Marvin, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Wisconsin - Madison

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A539772

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SMPH/SURGERY/SPEECH

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Protocol Version 9/28/2017

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2016-1149

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Validation of Aspiration Markers
NCT02301845 WITHDRAWN PHASE1