Validation of Aspiration Markers

NCT ID: NCT02301845

Last Updated: 2016-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is an interventional crossover study aimed at validating diatom shells as a marker for cuff leak and microaspiration in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

At present there is no standard method for the evaluation of in vivo cuff leak and aspiration. Most of the tested techniques have major pitfalls that render their routine application infeasible. Lacking a practical and reliable marker, any possible intervention aimed at improving cuff seal and ETT performance in order to reduce VAP occurrence is going to be hindered by the inability to truly evaluate its efficacy. Radiolabeled markers are expensive, expose the patient to considerable radiological risk, and require transport to a radiological department, which would expose critically ill patients to additional risk. Dyes have the potential to give useful information about the presence of a cuff leak, but due to persistent staining of secretions, they do not allow continuous monitoring of aspiration. Amylase detection could be a good marker of aspiration, but its ability to detect aspiration is poor even when compared to pepsin. Pepsin and bile acids have the potential to detect some of the aspirations and cuff leaks that happen daily in mechanically ventilated patients, but due to their gastrointestinal nature, they do not offer any kind of information about aspiration of contaminated oropharyngeal secretions. With this research protocol, we would like to validate the use of diatom skeletons suspended in saline as a marker for determining cuff leakage and aspiration events in an ICU population and compare its efficacy in identifying aspiration events with pepsin detection. Diatoms are a major group of algae, composing the majority of phytoplankton. Their diameter is 5-15 μm on average and 1 ml of seawater usually contains about 104 diatoms. They are unicellular organisms and their main feature is that they are enclosed within a cell wall made of amorphous silica, biopolymerized in a geometric fashion that is species-dependent. At the end of their vital cycle, diatom shells deposit at the bottom of the sea. Diatom shell deposits have been found in almost every place on Earth, and are the main component of diatomaceous earth (DE). DE is an extremely fine powder composed of diatom shells that have accumulated over thousands of years. Due to its microscopical texture and inexpensive nature, it is commonly employed as a filtering media for beverages and a drying and anti-mold agent for cereals. Diatom shells compose food-grade DE in its entirety. Due to its non-crystalline, amorphous nature, it is essentially nontoxic. Our hypothesis is that administration of 10 mg of DE suspended in 10 ml of saline into the pharyngeal cavity of intubated patients will act as a reliable marker of cuff leak and aspiration in critically ill patients. Thanks to their geometric shape, diatom shells should be easily detectable in tracheal secretions when observed under a microscope. The number of diatoms-per-field observed under a fixed magnification will allow for the detection of microaspiration in a qualitative and quantitative way. The introduction of this new, safe and inexpensive marker for evaluating ETT cuff performance and for detecting aspiration will improve the design of future studies aimed at VAP prevention

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pneumonia, Aspiration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Suspended Diatoms

Suspended diatom shells (10 mg/ 10 ml of saline) will be instilled in the oral cavity of the study subject every 12 hours for the first three study days. The total amount of amorphous silica administered will be 20 mg/day, which is the average daily intake of amorphous silica in normal human diet (0.3 mg/kg body weight/day)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Diatoms Shells

Intervention Type DRUG

Instillation of suspended diatom shells - 10 mg q12h

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diatoms Shells

Instillation of suspended diatom shells - 10 mg q12h

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years;
2. Admission to Surgical ICUs (Ellison 4 or Blake 12);
3. Patients expected to be intubated for at least 48 hours or longer from the time of enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

1. High PEEP requirement at enrollment (PEEP higher than 8 cmH2O)
2. Diagnosis of ARDS (any severity)
3. Status asthmaticus
4. Current or past participation in another interventional trial conflicting with the present study;
5. Pregnant women;
6. Prisoner status;
7. Patients who had partial or total gastrectomy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lorenzo Berra, MD

Staff Anesthetist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lorenzo Berra, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Creatures

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.