Assessment of Markers of Stress in Acute Ischemic Stroke With Hyperglycemia
NCT ID: NCT03318679
Last Updated: 2021-03-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
88 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-11-01
2020-12-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
If hyperglycemia in the acute phase was the only culprit in worsening the injury, then there should be no difference in the outcomes for DH and NDH. Existing data implies that the two categories are two distinct physiological entities that are thus not amenable to same treatment. Stating it simply NDH is not an insulin deficient state where as DH is.
Alternative possibility is that body and Neurons are accustomed to high sugars in diabetics and thus can tolerate higher sugars better during ischemic stroke compared to non diabetics.
The overarching hypothesis is that reducing blood sugars in NDH increases stroke volume and thus consequently worsens outcome.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stress Hyperglycemia and Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT04408768
Hyperglycemia as a Prognostic Factor In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
NCT04196322
Cerebral Responses to Insulin Induced Hypoglycemia
NCT02747680
Intensive Insulin Therapy With Tight Glycemic Control to Improve Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT02054429
Pre-admission Hyperglycemia and Its Effect on Morbidity and Mortality
NCT00871832
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
If hyperglycemia in the acute phase was the only culprit in worsening the injury, then there should be no difference in the outcomes for DH and NDH. Existing data implies that the two categories are distinct physiological entities that are thus not amenable to same treatment. Stating it simply NDH is not an insulin deficient state where as DH is.
Alternative possibility is that body and Neurons are accustomed to high sugars in diabetics and thus can tolerate higher sugars better during ischemic stroke compared to non diabetics.
The overarching hypothesis is that reducing blood sugars in NDH increases stroke volume and thus consequently worsens outcome.
1.2 Investigational Agent: No planned investigational agent is tested as part of this study.
1.3 Pre-clinical Data Currently there is clear data that patients that present with acute ischemic stroke have higher (two times) mortality at discharge and 90 day mark. Multiple clinical studies so far have not revealed any clear benefit of treatment (GIST-UK). There do seem to be two distinct groups when it comes to hyperglycemia at presentation of DM, HG in association of Diabetes and without any history of Diabetes. The outcomes in the two groups vary greatly.
1.4 Clinical Data to Date Please see attached article with references.
1.5 Dose Rationale and Risk/Benefits There is no drug or device or intervention that will be tested in this study. This study involves collection of blood samples from the patients who meet the inclusion criteria. Our goal is to be able to see if there is any difference between the two groups of patients.
2 Study Objectives
Primary Objective: Assess difference in laboratory values between two groups of patients.
Null Hypothesis: There is no difference in laboratory values between DH and NDH
3 Study Design
3.1 General Design This is a exploratory study to assess the difference in the lab values in two groups of patients. Patients that present to University of Minnesota Medical Center with acute ischemic stroke and are hyperglycemic (Blood sugar of more than 130 mg/dl) will be eligible for the study. Pre-specified volume of blood will be collected for lab analysis. This study does not involve testing of any procedure, drug or device.
Step One - Identify patients that have Ischemic strokes and have hyperglycemia \>130 mg/dl.
Step Two:
\- Obtain Consent from patient or POA.
Step Three:(Once consent obtained) - Collect first set of blood samples from patients with the first blood draw between 0-8 hours from time of ER arrival. Second blood sample will be collected in 9-16 hours and a 3rd one in 17-24 hour period.
Step Four:
\- No further data will be collected from patient. Study end point is difference in laboratory values between DH and NDH groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention is planned.
None is planned
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 18-100.
3. Subjects are hyperglycemic (defined as blood sugar above 130mg/dl).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Age less than 18 or more than 100.
3. Difficult blood draw.
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Minnesota
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rwoof A Reshi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Minnesota
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Reshi R, Streib C, Ezzeddine M, Biros M, Miller B, Lakshminarayan K, Anderson D, Ardelt A. Hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke: Is it time to re-evaluate our understanding? Med Hypotheses. 2017 Sep;107:78-80. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke: Is it time to re-evaluate our understanding?
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UMinnesota
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.