Intensive Insulin Therapy With Tight Glycemic Control to Improve Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT ID: NCT02054429
Last Updated: 2025-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Intravenous Versus Usual Subcutaneous Insulin in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT00472381
Insulin Glargine Versus Regular Insulin Based Regimens in Glycemic Control After Acute Stroke
NCT02607943
Procoagulant Effects of Hyperglycemia After Acute Stroke: A Pilot Study
NCT00373269
Hyperglycemia in Patients with Stroke and Indication of Enteral Nutrition
NCT03422900
Comparison of Two Strategies for Glycemic Control in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT00747279
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In addition to receiving endovascular and standard medical therapy for AIS, subjects will be randomized to an intensive insulin treatment arm (IIT arm) or control arm. In the IIT arm subjects will receive an insulin aspart infusion at a minimal rate of 2 units/hr while maintaining blood glucose between 90-120mg/dl for 48 hrs. Glucose control in the control will be at the discretion of the treating provider.
Subjects will have the following study procedures done at different time points: A) assessment of neurological outcomes : modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 30 days and 90 days and NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) at baseline , 24 hrs, 72 hrs, 30 days and 90 days.
B) MRI (Diffusion weighted imaging), 3-5 days and 90 days and C) various plasma and cellular endpoints will be measured in blood collected at baseline, 2, 4, 6, 24 , 48 and 72 hrs and at 30 days and 90 days.
The primary endpoint of the study is to detect a difference in the percentage of non diabetic subjects with mRS 0-2 at 90 days after an AIS treated with endovascular therapy, in the IIT and control arm.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Insulin
IIT arm subjects will receive an insulin aspart infusion at a minimal rate of 2 units/hr while maintaining blood glucose between 90-120mg/dl for 48 hrs
Insulin
Intensive Insulin Therapy (IIT) will be given to you by two IV infusions. The insulin infusion will be started immediately after you are moved to the intensive care unit (ICU) after endovascular therapy and continued for 48 hours
Standard glycemic control
standard of care if not randomized to Insulin
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Insulin
Intensive Insulin Therapy (IIT) will be given to you by two IV infusions. The insulin infusion will be started immediately after you are moved to the intensive care unit (ICU) after endovascular therapy and continued for 48 hours
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. All patients attending the emergency department (ED) of Kaleida health within 24 hrs of symptoms onset suggestive of an anterior circulation ischemic stroke.
3. CT perfusion suggesting Ischemic Core less than 30% of Penumbra territory.
4. No history of diabetes
5. First neurological event
6. Clinical signs consistent with the diagnosis of ischemic stroke, including impairment of language, motor function, cognition and/or gaze, vision, or neglect. Ischemic stroke is defined as an event characterized by the sudden onset of a focal neurologic deficit presumed to be due to cerebral ischemia after exclusion of ICH with a baseline CT
7. The signal stroke should be (a) acute, (b) the most recent significant, acute worsening of serial neurologic events, or (c) related to a diagnostic radiographic procedure but not an interventional procedure
8. Minimum NIHSS score \>4, except for isolated aphasia or isolated hemianopsia
9. Angiographic evidence of a clot in the anterior intracranial or extracranial circulation consistent with the neurologic deficit with complete occlusion (TICI grade 0) or contrast penetration with minimal perfusion (TICI grade 1).
10. Signed informed consent to participate given by patient or legal representative.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Neurologic signs that are rapidly improving by the time of randomization or treatment- a 4-point improvement from baseline NIHSS , or increase to absolute NIHSS \> 30 before randomization or treatment
3. Major stroke symptoms- NIHSS \>30
4. Seizure at the onset of stroke
5. Stroke due to a neurointerventional procedure for treatment of a cerebral aneurysm and/or cerebral arteriovenous malformation (stroke due to diagnostic cerebral angiography or cardiac catheterization might be treated)
6. Clinical presentation suggestive of subarachnoid hemorrhage, even when the initial CT scan is normal.
7. Previous known ICH at any time, neoplasm, and/or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
8. Patients with a known arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm, with or without any evidence of associated hemorrhage.
9. Presumed septic embolus
10. Known hereditary or acquired hemorrhagic diathesis, eg, aPTT or prothrombin time greater than normal; unsupported coagulation factor deficiency.
11. Baseline laboratory values that reveal platelets are \<30 000/µL, hematocrit or platelet cell volume \<25 volume %, or international normalized ratio \>1.7. (Any patient receiving heparin at the onset of stroke symptoms must have an aPTT 2 times the upper limit of normal before randomization. Patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin might need to be excluded because an anticoagulant effect is not measured by aPTT.)
12. Pregnancy, lactation, or parturition within the previous 30 days.
13. Known serious sensitivity to radiographic contrast agents.
14. Other serious, advanced, or terminal illness such that life expectancy is \<1 year.
15. Current participation in another research treatment protocol.
16. Previous participation in an acute stroke study.
17. Any condition in which angiography is contraindicated.
18. Uncompensated hypertension at study entry or hypertension requiring aggressive treatment to reduce blood pressure to non-hypertensive limits. Uncompensated hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure \>180 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 100 mm Hg on 3 repeated measures at least 10 minutes apart. Aggressive treatment is defined as the need for a continuous, parenteral antihypertensive, such as a nitroprusside drip, or the need to administer \>3 doses of a parenteral antihypertensive, such as labetalol, hydralazine, nicardepine.
19. Dependency on renal dialysis or known serum creatinine \> 2.0mg/dl
20. Serum glucose at admission \<80mg/dl
21. All known diabetic patients
22. Random Admission glucose \> 200mg/dl
23. High-attenuation lesion on CT consistent with a hemorrhage of any degree in any location.
24. Evidence of a significant mass effect with a midline shift due to a large infarct
25. Acute hypodense parenchymal lesion on CT or effacement of the cerebral sulci in more than one third of the MCA territory or suspected stroke region
26. Angiographic evidence of (a) Suspected carotid arterial dissection. (b) Arterial stenosis as the sole lesion or a high-grade stenosis that does not allow safe passage of a catheter. (b) Any nonatherosclerotic arteriopathy (eg, vasculitis)
27. Mentally incompetent and wards of the state.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University at Buffalo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adnan H. Siddiqui
Vice-Chairman & Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Buffalo Neurosurgery
Buffalo, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
INSULIN
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.