Cerebral Monitor Guided Therapy on Cerebral Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
NCT ID: NCT03316183
Last Updated: 2021-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-01
2025-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring During Cardiac Surgery
NCT00981474
The Safety and Efficacy of Peri-procedure Blood Pressure Management of Revascularization
NCT03256513
Predicting Cerebrovascular Adverse Events Post Cardiac Surgery
NCT05786274
Monitoring of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy
NCT00769691
Cerebral Oximetry and Neurological Outcomes in Aortic Arch Surgery Patients
NCT01149148
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Briefly, cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) or cerebral oximetry is a non-invasive monitor that estimates cerebral oxygenation through measurements of regional venous saturation. It is based on measuring intravascular oxyhemoglobin fraction in a small sample of cerebral cortex through the skull using near-infrared light spectroscopy. Cerebral oximetry examines all reflected light, from both pulsatile arterial and non-pulsatile venous blood, without requiring pulsatility, hence cerebral oximetry can continue to monitor brain oxygenation during both CPB and circulatory arrest. With this advantage, cerebral oximetry is widely utilized in our daily cardiac anesthesia practice, routinely for surgeries requiring circulatory arrest, and for other elective CABG and valve replacement/repair surgeries in some institutions. Despite its wide use, controversy still exists in its interpretation and ability to optimize cerebral outcome after cardiac surgery. Key questions to be answered are: 1) the desaturation threshold associated with poor prognosis; 2) the absolute desaturation value at which adverse clinical outcome increases, and 3); if the relative trend is more important to signal approaching deterioration. All of these questions are relevant to our clinical practice yet remain unanswered. Our research study aims to take a first step towards identification of the ideal method of utilizing cerebral oximetry in cardiac surgeries to improve neurological outcome through increasing precision in managing hemodynamic as well as laboratory values through a treatment algorithm.
The second component of this study incorporates metabolomic profiling as we refine the perioperative management of cardiac surgery patient to improve their cerebral outcome. Despite enormous research efforts over the last decades, currently there is no specific and single neurologic biomarker (or panels of biomarkers) that has been validated for clinical use. Meanwhile, neuro-imaging (CT and MRI) remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of cerebral injury. Organ-specific biomarkers, if identified, have the potential to be a reliable and cost-effective method to diagnose, guide management, classify severity of stroke, anticipate cognitive function, and predict complications. Recently, metabolomic profiling has enabled comprehensive analyses of changes in metabolic fuel selection in a variety of models, including cardioplegic arrest. Advances in analytical technology have enabled quantitative analysis of several hundreds of metabolites in a single measurement with high throughput and sensitivity.
Metabolomic profiling entails quantitating small-molecule metabolites from body fluids or tissues in a single step, and possesses the potential for early diagnosis, therapy monitoring and investigating the pathogenesis of various diseases. This biomarker detection is conducted in cells, tissues, or biofluids by either nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy or mass spectrometry (MS) which then undergoes multivariate data analysis. Jung et al., using 1H-NMR spectropy combined with multivariate statistical analysis assessed stroke patients. In this study perturbed metabolic pattern in both plasma and urine from patients with known cerebral infarction incidents were assessed to identify a specific proteome associated with stroke. A similar investigation has been conducted with a wider quantification of neuroproteomics using a rodent model. Biomarker prognostic of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has also been investigated. Despite its potential for wide application, metabolomic profiling has not seen its utilization to guide neuroprotective management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We believe the unique combination of these two methods poses a valuable opportunity not only to improve the patient's neurocognitive outcome, but also to gain insights on which biomarkers represent cerebral ischemia or other signs of cerebral injury.
Our specific aims are to: 1. Assess the transcerebral metabolomic profile and neurocognitive outcome in response to cerebral injury in patients monitored and treated according to cerebral oximetry (NIRS) and those that are just monitored with NIRS.
Based on available literature, our working hypothesis is that compared to monitored only patients, cerebral fuel utilization will be differentially affected in patients monitored and treated by tightly following a specific neuroprotective algorithm.
1.a. Test the plasma concentrations of metabolites representing the amino acid, carbohydrate, energy, lipid, and nucleotide pathways using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry.
1.b. Compare the neurocognitive function of treated and untreated patients using a comprehensive test battery consisting of 5 assessment modalities at baseline, at the time of discharge and 6 weeks postoperatively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
* Maintain rSO2 values at or above 75% of the baseline
* Midline position
* Target CO2 of ≥40 mmHg, target MAP \>60 mm Hg
* Maintain cerebral perfusion pressure \>50 mm Hg
* Target pump flow 2.5 L/m2/min
* If rSO2 persistently below treatment threshold:
* FiO2 is increased
* or propofol 50-100 mg bolus is administered
* If Hct below 20% packed red blood cells will be transfused
timeline: before induction, after time-out has been performed, and will continue until 24 hours post surgery.
Perioperative and postoperative management
Cerebral oximetry informed perioperative management
Control Group
Patients in the control group will be managed under the attending physician's discretion. Cerebral oximetry data will be collected in the same fashion as in the intervention group, but the measurements will be blinded to the physician. Blood samples will be collected for metabolomic profiling in the same fashion and at identical time points as the intervention group for later analysis.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perioperative and postoperative management
Cerebral oximetry informed perioperative management
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Technical obstacles, which pose an inordinately high surgical risk, in the judgment of the investigator;
* Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support other than intra- aortic balloon counter pulsation;
* Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 50 kg/m2;
* Pregnancy;
* Psychiatric disease, irreversible cognitive dysfunction or psychosocial issues that are likely to impair compliance with the study protocol;
* Presence of active, uncontrolled infection;
* Evidence of intrinsic hepatic disease as defined by liver enzyme values;
* Participation in any other clinical investigation that is likely to confound study results or affect study outcome;
* Patient refuses to be enrolled in study;
* Institution inmates
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kei Togashi
Assistant Professor, School of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kei Togashi, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00002376
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.