Assessing Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation During Surgery in the Head-up Position
NCT ID: NCT01225185
Last Updated: 2017-08-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
240 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-07-31
2015-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Monitoring of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy
NCT00769691
Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness Using Dynamic Preload Indices During Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery in the Beach Chair Position
NCT02291185
Detection of Hypovolemia in the Elderly Patient Undergoing Surgery
NCT06229938
Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring During Cardiac Surgery
NCT00981474
Autoregulation Assessment During Liver Transplantation
NCT01425385
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The specific aims of this study are:
1. To compare the average cerebral oximetry index and the percentage of time with abnormal COx between subjects in the head up or supine position during surgery under general anesthesia.
2. To compare the range of arterial blood pressure required for a normal cerebral oximetry index between subjects anesthetized in the head up or supine position.
3. To assess the association between impaired cerebral blood flow autoregulation and postoperative neurocognitive decline 1 month after surgery and perioperative elevation of serum glial fibrillary acid protein.
Monitoring autoregulation non-invasively with COx has the potential to improve patient safety by delineating individualized limits of safe ABP for patients at risk of neurologic injury.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients undergoing shoulder surgery
This observational study will compare cerebral blood flow autoregulation in patients undergoing surgery in either the supine lateral position or the semi-recumbent or "beach chair" position. The choice of patient positioning is not randomized but based on usual surgical considerations.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation
OTHER
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charles W Hogue, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APSF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.