Agreement Between Clinician and Instrumented Laxity Assessment
NCT ID: NCT03309098
Last Updated: 2024-09-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-11-28
2017-11-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Agreement Between Rolimeter and Lachmeter in Patients With ACL Injury
NCT05614297
Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of an Alternate Lachman's Test Performed in a Prone Position
NCT01301014
Reliability and Validity of Inline Dynamometry Study for Measuring Knee Extensor Torque
NCT05109871
Can Neuromuscular Training Alter Movement Patterns
NCT01773317
Ankle Strengthening in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT06801483
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic outcomes of a clinician and of a diagnostic arthrometer when testing acute ankle injuries. Participants will be recruited at University of Nebraska at Omahas (UNO) Injury Prevention and Care Clinic and Athletic Training Room in Sapp Fieldhouse. Participants with be members of the UNO Wellness Center or UNO athlete, aged 19-80 years old. During a standard evaluation the participant will have a clinician test manual ligamentous laxity and a blinded clinician testing laxity using an arthrometer. Participation will not alter the normal treatment or care for participants. The author hypothesizes that the diagnostic accuracy for all performed test will be good to excellent when assessed for laxity and moderate to good when assessed for pain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ankle Injury
Person who injures their ankle
Ligmaster Arthrometer Assessment
Perform an anterior drawer, inversion stress test and eversion stress test on the participant with an ankle arthrometer (LigMaster Version 1.26, Sport Tech, Inc, Charlottesville, Virginia).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ligmaster Arthrometer Assessment
Perform an anterior drawer, inversion stress test and eversion stress test on the participant with an ankle arthrometer (LigMaster Version 1.26, Sport Tech, Inc, Charlottesville, Virginia).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
19 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Nebraska
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adam Rosen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Nebraska
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0526-17-EP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.