Arthrometry and Clinical Tests for Diagnosing ACL Tears
NCT ID: NCT05416632
Last Updated: 2024-11-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-06
2024-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Imaging modalities (e.g., MRI) are utilised when clinical diagnosis is not clear but are expensive and delay diagnosis. Hand-held arthrometry is an instrument that can be used in the clinical setting to provide an immediate, objective measure of ACL laxity, but this device has not been adequately validated.
The first aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of hand-held arthrometry for diagnosing ACL tears following acute injury. A reliable and valid device could reduce healthcare costs and expedite appropriate treatment, thereby improving the management of patients following knee injury. The second aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Lever sign test using a more robust study design than previously employed in other studies.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnostic Study of ACL Rupture With Anterior Drawer Test at 90° of Hip Flexion
NCT04957706
Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of an Alternate Lachman's Test Performed in a Prone Position
NCT01301014
Knee Functionality Recovery Indicators in Athletes Submitted to Ligamentoplasty of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
NCT06050005
Agreement Between Rolimeter and Lachmeter in Patients With ACL Injury
NCT05614297
Application of Multiple Vertical Jump Tests in Return-to-Play Assessment for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Athletes
NCT07297511
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often performed following knee trauma, as immediate swelling is associated with significant knee injury. However, MRI is costly and can result in a significant delay in diagnosis due to the time it takes for the scan to be performed, reported and acted on. Hand-held arthrometers are clinical instruments that provide immediate, objective measurement of knee laxity, which can then be used to inform decision making. Previous research indicates a side-to-side difference in laxity \>3mm is diagnostic for an ACL rupture, with \<3mm indicating a partial tear, but this device has not been adequately evaluated in acute presentations. In addition, the accuracy of ACL tests has not been adequately evaluated using robust methodology (randomised control trial) so diagnostic values may have been previously overestimated.
The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of hand-held arthrometry in acute presentations (\<3 weeks) using MRI as the reference standard and a prospective design. In addition, a blinded, randomised control trial will be conducted using known ACL- injured and non-injured patients (based on MRI results), to provide robust diagnostic accuracy values for clinical ACL tests.
The hypothesis is that hand-held arthrometry will have superior diagnostic accuracy to the Lachman values reported in the systematic review and meta-analysis of Sokal et al (Sn: 0.89, Sp: 0.62, LR+ 1.79, LR- 0.33). A second hypothesis is that the Lever sign diagnostic accuracy values will be inferior to those reported in the the SR and MA of Sokal et al (Sn: 0.83, Sp: 0.91, LR+ 9.66, LR- 0.18). If arthrometry provides a reliable and valid measure of knee laxity, the device could save significant costs and delays to diagnosis associated with MRI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arthrometer
Athrometer
Arthrometer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Athrometer
Arthrometer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
* Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
Exclusion Criteria
The participant may not enter the study if they are unable to provide written consent to study participation, or there are contraindications to arthrometer testing or MRI, including the following:
* History of chronic disease or disorder that may put the participants at risk because of participation in the study including non-united fractures, severe peripheral vascular disease, aneurysms, recent (\<3 months) radiotherapy or chemotherapy, neurological disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease), skin conditions at point of testing, severe osteoporosis, malignancy, rheumatoid arthritis.
* Patients with implanted surgical clips or other ferromagnetic material including shrapnel, metallic implants (excluding joint replacements \>6 weeks since surgery), non-MRI compatible prosthetic heart valves, surgery within 6 weeks, pregnancy, patients with compromised thermoregulatory systems.
* History of chronic musculoskeletal disease or disorder in either leg.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard Norris
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Liverpool University Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abbasi D, May MM, Wall EJ, Chan G, Parikh SN. MRI findings in adolescent patients with acute traumatic knee hemarthrosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Dec;32(8):760-4. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182648d45.
Olsson O, Isacsson A, Englund M, Frobell RB. Epidemiology of intra- and peri-articular structural injuries in traumatic knee joint hemarthrosis - data from 1145 consecutive knees with subacute MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Nov;24(11):1890-1897. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
Sarimo J, Rantanen J, Heikkila J, Helttula I, Hiltunen A, Orava S. Acute traumatic hemarthrosis of the knee. Is routine arthroscopic examination necessary? A study of 320 consecutive patients. Scand J Surg. 2002;91(4):361-4. doi: 10.1177/145749690209100410.
Filbay SR, Grindem H. Evidence-based recommendations for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;33(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
van Eck CF, van den Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Poolman RW, Kerkhoffs GM. Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of physical examinations with and without anaesthesia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Aug;21(8):1895-903. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2250-9. Epub 2012 Oct 20.
Hatcher J, Hatcher A, Arbuthnot J, McNicholas M. An investigation to examine the inter-tester and intra-tester reliability of the Rolimeter knee tester, and its sensitivity in identifying knee joint laxity. J Orthop Res. 2005 Nov;23(6):1399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.06.003.1100230623. Epub 2005 Aug 3.
Decary S, Ouellet P, Vendittoli PA, Roy JS, Desmeules F. Diagnostic validity of physical examination tests for common knee disorders: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2017 Jan;23:143-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
Muellner T, Bugge W, Johansen S, Holtan C, Engebretsen L. Inter- and intratester comparison of the Rolimeter knee tester: effect of tester's experience and the examination technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001 Sep;9(5):302-6. doi: 10.1007/s001670100225.
Sokal PA, Norris R, Maddox TW, Oldershaw RA. The diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for anterior cruciate ligament tears are comparable but the Lachman test has been previously overestimated: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Oct;30(10):3287-3303. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06898-4. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
Norris R, Price A, Byrne J, Pulford S, van Melick N, Maddox TW, Boswell W, Kerin C, Oldershaw RA. The Lever Sign Test Demonstrates Limited Clinical Utility for Diagnosing Full-Thickness Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears After a Traumatic Knee Injury. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 May 14;13(5):23259671251334775. doi: 10.1177/23259671251334775. eCollection 2025 May.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SP0925
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.