Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-10-06
2017-09-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This single centre UK study will determine if it is feasible to carry out a randomised controlled BMD study in the acute SCI patient population. The study will compare the BMD of patients who receive Ekso Therapy (powered exoskeleton device) verse patients who receive usual physiotherapy alone (control group). It will address patient recruitment rates and reasons for withdrawal from the study and highlight any practicality issues with study conduct. It will also provide preliminary data on the effects of Ekso Therapy on BMD, biochemistry and bone turnover markers.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Exoskeletal-assisted Walking Combined With Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Bone Strength.
NCT07325149
Mobility and Therapeutic Benefits Resulting From Exoskeleton Use in a Clinical Setting (SC140121 Study 1 and 2)
NCT03082898
Exoskeleton and Spinal Cord Stimulation for SCI
NCT03096197
Activity Dependent Rehabilitation Model to Improve Bone and Muscle Outcomes
NCT02309983
Exoskeletal-assisted Walking to Improve Mobility, Bowel Function and Cardio-Metabolic Profiles in Persons With SCI
NCT02314221
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to rapid and profound bone loss with large decreases in bone mineral density (BMD) below the level of the lesion (Frey-Rindova et al., 2000). Decreases in BMD of \~2% per month from the lower limbs have been reported and rates of loss are maximal over the first two years (Jiang et al., 2005). Bone loss is associated with increased bone resorption and remodelling imbalance which is thought to be due to the combined effects of immobility together with neurogenic effects. As a consequence, there is an increased risk of fragility fractures particularly of the lower limbs including an increased risk of hip fracture. Lower limb fragility fractures affect up to 35% of patients following SCI. These fractures are associated with considerable morbidity and an increase in mortality.
BMD is conventionally measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This technique enables measurement of bone mineral content, projected area and areal BMD at the lumbar spine and proximal femur. DXA does not allow differentiation between cortical and trabecular bone and does not have the ability to examine microstructural change. High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) is a novel technique which enables changes in trabecular and cortical microstructure to be evaluated. Using HR-pQCT it is possible to detect changes in surrogate measures of bone strength in response to loss of weight bearing activity over just 6 weeks (Kazakia et al, 2014).
To date, there is no established intervention which has been demonstrated to prevent or reverse bone loss and fractures in this clinical setting. Small studies have suggested that anti-resorptive agents including bisphosphonates (Bryson et al., 2009) and denosumab (Gifre et al., 2015) have potential to protect against bone loss following SCI. Physical therapy using vibration was ineffective (Dudley-Javoroski et al., 2015) as was an ambulation programme undertaken late in the management of SCI (Needham-Shropshire et al., 1997). Once bone loss has occurred, it appears to be at best only partially reversible on recovery of lower limb function. It has been postulated that weight-bearing activity on its own (Dionyssiotis et al., 2015) or perhaps in combination with anti-resorptive treatment has the potential to preserve or improve bone health following SCI.
In 2014, a new therapy service called 'Ekso Therapy' was introduced at the Sheffield Princess Royal Spinal Injuries Centre. Ekso is a revolutionary powered exoskeleton device, which is strapped on to patients with a SCI to enable them to stand and walk. The device is manufactured by Ekso Bionics and is CE marked. It has been reported to be a good form of exercise allowing patients to stretch, and is claimed to be beneficial for muscle strength, bone health, bowel and bladder function and circulation and has a positive psychological impact. None of these claims have been investigated or proven in large clinical trials.
This single centre UK study will therefore determine if it is feasible to carry out a randomised controlled bone study in the acute SCI patient population using the Ekso device. Investigators will compare the BMD of acute SCI patients before and after they receive a programme of Ekso Therapy alongside their usual physiotherapy and compare it to patients who receive standing therapy with usual physiotherapy alone (control group).
It will address patient recruitment rates and reasons for withdrawal from the study and highlight any practicality issues with study conduct. It will also provide preliminary data on the effects of Ekso Therapy on bone mineral density, biochemistry and bone turnover markers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ekso Therapy
Up to 12 weeks of Ekso Therapy. Three sessions per week. One hour per session
Ekso Therapy (Exoskeleton Suit)
Control
Up to 12 weeks of usual physiotherapy care. Three sessions per week. One hour per session.
Usual Physiotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ekso Therapy (Exoskeleton Suit)
Usual Physiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Traumatic and non-traumatic incomplete tetraplegic or paraplegic patient following acute SCI injury
* Be able to provide written informed consent or verbal consent in the presence of an independent witness
* Stable medical condition
* Independently transfer from a wheelchair to a regular chair ideally by completing a "lift and shift" manoeuvre or a standing pivot transfer.
* Currently undertaking an active standing programme with a standing frame i.e. Oswestry Standing Frame, for longer than 15 minutes for inpatients
* Sufficient upper limb function to be able to grasp and release objects in the hands with or without use of 'Active hands'.
* Sufficient range of movement to tolerate sit to stand and normal walking.
* Sufficient upper extremity strength and sitting balance to assist with balance in standing with a frame and or crutches.
* Sufficient lower extremity bone density to stand in standing frame and walk in traditional orthotics
* Motor complete paralysis (Asia A) C7 or below
* Incomplete motor paralysis (Asia C) C2 or below
* Weigh 220 pounds (100 kilograms) or less
* Between 5'2" and 6'4" (157 to 188 cm) tall
* Standing hip width of 17.5" or less.
Exclusion Criteria
* Lack the mental capacity to consent
* Ventilated patients
* Significant upper or lower limb contractures / spasticity
* Currently participating in another research study which may have an impact on the study or patient safety and well-being.
* Range of motion restrictions that would prevent clients from achieving a normal, reciprocal gait pattern, or would restrict clients completing normal sit-to-stand or stand-to-sit transitions
* Spinal instability
* Unresolved deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
* Decreased standing tolerance due to orthostatic hypotension
* Significant osteoporosis that prevents safe standing or may increase the risk of fracture caused by standing or walking
* Previous lower limb fractures less than 6 months ago.
* Uncontrolled spasticity
* Uncontrolled Autonomic Dysreflexia (AD)
* Insufficient upper extremity strength to assist with balance with frame or crutches
* Leg length discrepancy above recommended values. (Upper leg length discrepancy greater than half an inch (\> .5") or lower leg discrepancy greater than three-quarters of an inch (\>.75") )
* Skin integrity issues on contact surfaces of the device or on surfaces that would prohibit sitting
* Cognitive impairments resulting in motor planning or impulsivity concerns
* Pregnancy
* Ability to mobilise further than 10m on the parallel bars or with use of a walking aid.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northern General Hospital
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STH19034
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.