Spinal Decompression Plus Nerve Graft Implantation Following TSCI

NCT ID: NCT06243211

Last Updated: 2025-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-19

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a single-blinded (with outcome assessors blinded to treatment allocation), 12-month pilot study to evaluate of the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of dorsal myelotomy and expansive duraplasty performed either without or with autologous nerve graft implantation after acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Ten participants will be allocated to receive either DMED (n=5) or DMED + ANGI (n=5) based on a block design. Participants and assessors will be blinded to group allocation. Excess sural nerve samples will be collected for banking/analysis (may include proteomic, culturing, genomic, cellular analysis).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with devastating personal burdens including paralysis, sensory changes, autonomic dysfunction, and chronic debilitating pain. Few effective treatments have been developed with standard of care consisting of state-of-the-art neurocritical care, timely surgical decompression, and rehabilitation. While a variety of novel neuroprotective and neuroregenerative approaches have been posited, clinical trials to date have failed to demonstrate associated clinical benefits.

Current therapies are primarily aimed at reducing secondary injury processes, which are related to inflammation and ischemia, that persist over days-to-weeks following the primary mechanical insult. Intraparenchymal progressive hemorrhagic necrosis and swelling within the restrictive physical barrier of the pial and dural layers leads to further compression and ischemia, propagating the secondary injury cascade.

Early surgical bony decompression following SCI is thought to improve clinical outcomes, specifically after cervical-level injuries.

While few developments have been made in actual surgical techniques beyond bony decompression, early reports suggest that reduction of intraspinal pressure (ISP) could reduce secondary injury. Long-recognized but not clinically employed techniques to reduce ISP involve fashioning a dorsal midline myelotomy to allow for intramedullary decompression of hematoma and necrotic tissue and expansion of the dural compartment by opening the dura and sewing in of an expansive patch.

Corollary techniques have long been standard-of-care following cranial trauma: removal of the calvarial bone, evacuation of hematoma, expansive dural closure, and treatment of intra-cranial pressure have been proven effective in several randomized clinical trials.

Each of these steps are also at times used in other domains of spinal surgery, specifically oncologic resections. Despite having been demonstrated as an option to manage spinal trauma by Allen over a century ago, these techniques have not been widely studied or applied in modern spinal surgery.

The data obtained from this study will be used to inform and advance the practice of spinal cord decompression and cell-based therapies following acute SCI. Information on microsurgical technique adjustments, neurocritical nursing care standards, medical management, and ISP metrics may prove invaluable in advancing the feasible and safe aspects of these interventions.

SCI is a severely disabling neurological condition leading to impaired mobility, pain, and autonomic dysfunction. As potentially neuroprotective strategies, dorsal myelotomy and expansive duraplasty (DMED) along with cell-based therapies (e.g., autologous nerve tissue graft implantation, ANGI) are recognized as promising candidates to promote functional recovery. However, no trials of these therapies in patients have yet provided reproducible evidence of clinical efficacy, challenged by small effect sizes, low immune suppression, and low sensitivity study designs.

This pilot study design represents the first stage of a systematic evaluation of DMED +/- ANGI performed in the early/acute phase after SCI. Performance of DMED at early timepoints is expected to have the greatest impact on minimizing the deleterious effect of increased ISP and secondary injury due to PHN, which is known to be ongoing over the first hours and days after SCI. Assessment of the feasibility and safety of performing DMED +/- ANGI represent a critical first step prior to engaging in any larger-scale multicenter evaluations of efficacy.

Future larger-scale phases of the study will focus on elucidating the efficacy of these interventions in protecting against secondary neuronal injury processes and in improving function after SCI. The pilot data generated from this study will prove crucial in seeking a larger award from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other funding sources.

While refinements and combined therapies may prove useful, widespread clinical translation of currently employed cell transplantation protocols will likely face critical logistic and safety-related obstacles, particularly in the most opportune acute phase after SCI. The need for cell culturing and concomitant immunosuppression are fraught with potential complications, especially considering the relative immune compromised state and elevated risk of infections in the acute phase after SCI that can independently negatively impact neurological outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a single-blinded (with outcome assessors blinded to treatment allocation), 12-month pilot study to evaluate of the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of dorsal myelotomy and expansive duraplasty performed either without or with autologous nerve graft implantation after acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Ten participants will be allocated to receive either DMED (n=5) or DMED + ANGI (n=5) based on a block design. Participants and assessors will be blinded to group allocation. Excess sural nerve samples will be collected for banking/analysis (may include proteomic, culturing, genomic, cellular analysis).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Single-blinded (with outcome assessors blinded to treatment allocation)

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DMED

Dorsal myelotomy and expansive duraplasty (DMED) only.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DMED

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Decompression of spinal cord with stabilization - posterior approach.

DMED + ANGI

Dorsal myelotomy and expansive duraplasty (DMED) and supplemental autologous nerve graft implantation (ANGI).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DMED

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Decompression of spinal cord with stabilization - posterior approach.

ANGI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Implantation of nerve tissue following decompression ans stabilization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DMED

Decompression of spinal cord with stabilization - posterior approach.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ANGI

Implantation of nerve tissue following decompression ans stabilization.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Spinal Cord decompression and stabilization Autologous Nerve Graft Implantation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: = 18 years and = 80 years
* Written informed consent by patient or legal authorized representative
* No other life-threatening injury
* No evidence of sepsis
* Acute cervical or thoracic SCI with ASIA Impairment Scale grade A or B on admission
* Non-penetrating SCI at neurologic level from C2 to C8 or T1 to T12
* The ability to undergo surgical intervention including study procedures through a posterior approach within 48 hours of injury

Exclusion Criteria

* Unconsciousness or other mental impairment that prevents neurological assessment within the first 48 hours
* Acute SCI with ASIA Impairment Scale grade C, D or E
* Spinal cord decompression and spinal stabilization can be safely performed through an anterior-only approach (i.e. posterior approach is not required)
* Currently involved in another non-observational SCI research study or receiving another investigational drug
* Other illness (including mental disorder) that could preclude accurate medical and neurological evaluation (at discretion of the principal investigator)
* Unable to commit to the follow-up schedule
* A recent history of regular substance abuse (illicit drugs, alcohol), which in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the subject's participation in the study
* Any condition likely to result in the patient's death within the next 12 months
* Prisoner
* Subjects who in the opinion of the investigator are not suitable for inclusion in the study (reason to be documented).
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center (SCOBIRC)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Francis Farhadi

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Francis Farhadi

Associate Professor, Neurosurgery

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Francis H Farhadi, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Kentucky Neurosurgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Kentucky - Chandler Medical Center

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Francis H Farhadi, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

859-323-5661

Harshit Arora, PhD

Role: CONTACT

859-323-4533

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Francis Farhadi, MD, PhD

Role: primary

859-323-5661

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Al-Sharshahi Z, Wilcox JT, Darabi H, Arora H, Quintero JE, Gerhardt GA, van Horne CG, Farhadi F. Design and protocol for the decompression-plus trial: a phase 1 clinical study of dorsal myelotomy and expansive duroplasty with or without autologous nerve grafting in acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jul 8;48(1):547. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03701-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40624376 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

91630

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Safety Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT04205019 COMPLETED PHASE1
Stem Cell Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT02009124 WITHDRAWN PHASE2
Spinal Cord Neuromodulation for Spinal Cord Injury
NCT02313194 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Epidural Stimulation for Upper Extremity Function
NCT06437548 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA