Comparison of Dynamic Radiographs in Determining Fusion Level in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction

NCT ID: NCT03296228

Last Updated: 2020-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

134 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to identify the flexibility radiograph(s) that can most accurately predict the curve behaviour after surgical correction of AIS. With these findings, the investigators hope to give further guidance for the selection of fusion levels and to incorporate different dynamic radiographs into the Lenke Classification, leading to a more universal application that can consistently lead to good surgical and clinical outcome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Lenke Classification is the most widely-accepted classification for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) in the world. Its recommendations for fusion of the minor curves depend on its structurality. It defines a minor curve as structural if there is inflexibility on side-bending more than 25 . However, a recent Delphi survey from a panel of experts in AIS management showed that there was no consensus as to which type of dynamic radiograph was optimal. Up to two thirds of the surgeons did not use side-bending as a routine, and hence they cannot apply the Lenke Classification accurately in clinical practice nor follow its recommendations for fusion.

Furthermore, the current classification does not give specific recommendations regarding the selection of fusion levels and does not take into account the clinical appearance of the patients which impact on treatment. Consequently, there are still controversies regarding the Upper Instrumented Vertebra (UIV) and Lowest Instrumented Vertebra (LIV) selections, and following the recommendations may not allow fusion of the least number of segments nor give best clinical results eg shoulder balance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hong Kong

Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (supine, supine side-bend, FB)

supine side-bending and fulcrum bending films

Flexibility Radiographs (supine, supine side-bend, FB)

Intervention Type RADIATION

Supine, supine side-bend, fulcrum bend

Turkey

Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (supine, supine side-bend, FB)

Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (awake traction)

Radiation: Flexibility Radiographs (STUGA)

supine side-bending, fulcrum bending films, awake traction and supine traction under GA

Flexibility Radiographs (supine, supine side-bend, FB)

Intervention Type RADIATION

Supine, supine side-bend, fulcrum bend

Flexibility Radiographs (awake traction)

Intervention Type RADIATION

awake traction

Flexibility Radiographs (STUGA)

Intervention Type RADIATION

supine traction under GA

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Flexibility Radiographs (supine, supine side-bend, FB)

Supine, supine side-bend, fulcrum bend

Intervention Type RADIATION

Flexibility Radiographs (awake traction)

awake traction

Intervention Type RADIATION

Flexibility Radiographs (STUGA)

supine traction under GA

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients diagnosed with AIS who reach the threshold for surgical correction.
* Patients aged 10 to 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Neuromuscular deformity
* Prior fusion or spine surgery
* Spinal tumor diagnosis
* Congenital anomalies
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AO Foundation, AO Spine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Kenny Kwan

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr Kenny Kwan, BMBCh(Oxon)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hamzaoglu A, Talu U, Tezer M, Mirzanli C, Domanic U, Goksan SB. Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 15;30(14):1637-42. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170580.92177.d2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16025034 (View on PubMed)

Clements DH, Marks M, Newton PO, Betz RR, Lenke L, Shufflebarger H; Harms Study Group. Did the Lenke classification change scoliosis treatment? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun 15;36(14):1142-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318207e9c4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21358471 (View on PubMed)

Cheh G, Lenke LG, Lehman RA Jr, Kim YJ, Nunley R, Bridwell KH. The reliability of preoperative supine radiographs to predict the amount of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):2668-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5269.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18007242 (View on PubMed)

Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1169-81.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11507125 (View on PubMed)

Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. 2003. Marcel Dekker, New York

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UW 16-208

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Function and Scoliosis Surgery
NCT02237248 COMPLETED