Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-05
2020-11-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: The use of the new X-PSI Knee System achieves the same accuracy with respect to mechanical alignment as with conventional instrumentation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Kinematic Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties
NCT02921594
ATTUNE Cementless FB Tibial Base Clinical Study
NCT04630262
Materialise X-ray Knee Guides for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02713906
Clinical Performance and Safety of the Unicompartmental Univation® XF Pro Implant
NCT06657248
Randomized Controlled Clinical Outcomes of the Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee System
NCT02175576
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this multi-center, prospective, non-controlled post-market study is to scientifically document the accuracy, cost-effectiveness and subsequent clinical performance of the X-PSI Knee System. The X-PSI pin guides are designed to facilitate a more simplified, efficient and customized TKA procedure compared to conventional, non-guided instrumentation.
To evaluate the accuracy of the X-PSI Knee System, early postoperative (4-6 weeks) imaging data will be analysed with regards to the mechanical alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle) of the leg and matched to preoperative planning imaging data. The X-PSI Knee System cohort will then be compared with current literature (70% of cases within ±3 degrees) where patients were conventionally operated with non-guided surgery. No control group will be studied.
The cost-effectiveness of the X-PSI Knee System will be evaluated with an efficiency matrix to record OR set-up time, surgery time and post-processing time.
Clinical outcome data of the patients will be evaluated 4-6 weeks and 1 year post-surgery with the help of patient questionnaires (VAS pain scale, EQ-5D and Oxford Knee Score), a physical exam and the assessment of radiographs.
The study population will be compromised of males and females requiring total knee arthroplasty and satisfy the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study will last one (1) year from the time of surgery. The collected data aim to improve the treatment and quality of life of patients suffering from degenerative joint diseases. In addition, shorter surgery times possibly result in reduced risk of infection, decreased time of anaesthesia and better cost-effectiveness.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Total knee arthroplasty
Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty
X-PSI Knee System
Patients are operated with X-PSI Knee System guides
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
X-PSI Knee System
Patients are operated with X-PSI Knee System guides
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient can follow the X-PSI Knee System imaging protocol as part of standard of care procedures.
* Patient gets TKA treatment which follows the criteria of the appropriate Instruction for Use.
* Patient is willing and able to cooperate in the required postoperative standard of care.
* Patient is willing and able to complete scheduled follow-up evaluations as described in the Informed Consent.
* Patient has participated in the study-related Informed Consent process and has signed the Ethics Committee approved Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have any condition which would in the judgement of the Investigator place the patient at undue risk or interfere with the study. Any patient who is institutionalized, or is a known drug abuser, a known alcoholic or anyone who cannot understand what is required from them
* Patient is known to be pregnant
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zimmer, GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Oliver Schaetti, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Jr. Clinical Project Lead
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
HELIOS Kliniken Mittelweser GmbH
Nienburg, , Germany
Knie Praxis Prof. Dr. Tibesku
Straubing, , Germany
Zuyderland Medical Park
Sittard, , Netherlands
Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Bournemouth, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CSE2017-01K
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.