Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim 1: Comparison of patellofemoral kinematics between dome and anatomic implant designs using stereo radiography and correlation with patient function as measured by Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score, Knee Society score, and strength.
Hypothesis: the anatomic patellar implant will have significantly greater sagittal flexion than the dome implant.
Aim 2: Comparison of dome and anatomic moment arm, quadriceps efficiency, patellar contact mechanics and loading through the use of subject-specific simulation.
Hypothesis: quadriceps efficiency and moment arm will be greater for the anatomic patellar implant, while loading between the patellar and femoral components will be reduced.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ATTUNE TM Video-fluoroscopy Study
NCT02358434
Survivorship of Attune Primary Total Knee Prosthesis
NCT01754363
Mechanics Analysis of Patients Having a Sigma Mobile Bearing TKA
NCT01714492
ATTUNE Single-Use Instrumentation vs. ATTUNE Reusable Instrumentation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02574312
14022 ATTUNE Cementless RP Clinical Performance Evaluation
NCT02839850
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Previous measurement and modeling comparisons of PF kinematics between dome and anatomic resurfacing designs have revealed differences in patellar sagittal plane flexion that have implications for quadriceps efficiency and patient satisfaction. Quadriceps efficiency is a measure of the effective moment arm of the quadriceps muscles; greater efficiency allows the quadriceps to produce knee extensor torque with less force. Patellar flexion can alter quadriceps efficiency by changing the moment arm of the patellar tendon and the way the patella transmits quadriceps force due to changes in patellofemoral contact. Patient satisfaction may be affected by changes in quadriceps efficiency through increased extensor mechanism strain and changes in load transfer that may be linked to anterior knee pain. While HSSR measurements can elucidate differences in dome and anatomic kinematics, computational modeling is required to determine how kinematic differences affect joint and muscle forces and overall limb functionality.
Aim 1: Comparison of patellofemoral kinematics between dome and anatomic implant designs using stereo radiography and correlation with patient function as measured by Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score, Knee Society score, and strength. Laboratory measurements will be collected from 22 TKA patients with medialized dome and 22 TKA patients with medialized anatomic patellae. Equal numbers of men and women will be recruited for the study. The angle of the patellar component relative to the femoral component will be measured and compared to reported values in healthy subjects. Correlations will be made with patient outcome scores.
Aim 2: Comparison of dome and anatomic moment arm, quadriceps efficiency, patellar contact mechanics and loading through the use of subject-specific simulation. Moment arm will be measured in millimeters as the distance from the patellar tendon to the knee joint center of rotation, and compared to values reported for the healthy knee. Quadriceps efficiency will be calculated as the ratio of quadriceps force to patellar tendon force. Patellar contact mechanics are defined as the force and location of force between the patellar and femoral components.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Medialized Dome Patella
Subjects with total knee arthroplasty using the DePuy Synthes Attune Posterior Stabilized Rotating Platform including patella resurfacing with a medialized dome component geometry
DePuy Synthes Attune PS RP
Anatomic Patella
Subjects with total knee arthroplasty using the DePuy Synthes Attune Posterior Stabilized Rotating Platform including patella resurfacing with an anatomic component geometry
DePuy Synthes Attune PS RP
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DePuy Synthes Attune PS RP
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Unilateral or bilateral total knee replacement with an Attune posterior-stabilized rotating-platform implant including either medialized dome or medialized anatomic patellae
* Minimum 9 months post TKA procedure
Exclusion Criteria
* Inactive or unable to participate for health reasons (40 or greater on the physical component scale and and the mental component scale composite scores of the SF-12 Health Survey)
* Neurologic deficit that affects function or understanding of testing protocol
* Pregnant
* Other participation in a research study involving exposure to x-ray radiation
* body mass index greater than 30
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
DePuy Synthes
INDUSTRY
Colorado Joint Replacement
OTHER
University of Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kevin Shelburne
Senior Research Engineer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin Shelburne, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Denver
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Website of the Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
779383 2015 Attune Patella
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.