Assessing Impact of CCO's PSO & PC Pathway in Ambulatory HNC Clinics
NCT ID: NCT03266276
Last Updated: 2024-01-26
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
98 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2017-10-10
Study Completion Date
2019-12-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Rates of depression and anxiety in cancer patients are much higher compared to the general population. 40% of head and neck cancer patients will develop significant distress along the cancer journey. Less than half of these patients are able to access support, with factors such as age, social difficulty, cancer stage and site affecting referral. In 2016, 78,000 Canadians died of cancer, yet there is limited implementation of routine and integrated advanced care planning in cancer care.
An upcoming deliverable of all cancer centres in Ontario is the integration of Cancer Care Ontario's Psychosocial and Palliative Care (PSOPC) pathway into all disease pathways. Successful widespread implementation of this pathway at Odette Cancer Centre (OCC) will impact \>16,000 patients/year. If effective, it will reduce suffering, unnecessary healthcare utilization, improve treatment decisions and compliance, enable a better quality of life in survivorship and improve quality at end of life. There is a need for better developed, standardized response pathways to address PSO and PC needs throughout the patient's journey.
An upcoming deliverable of all cancer centres in Ontario is the integration of Cancer Care Ontario's Psychosocial and Palliative Care (PSOPC) pathway into all disease pathways. Successful widespread implementation of this pathway at Odette Cancer Centre (OCC) will impact \>16,000 patients/year. If effective, it will reduce suffering, unnecessary healthcare utilization, improve treatment decisions and compliance, enable a better quality of life in survivorship and improve quality at end of life. There is a need for better developed, standardized response pathways to address PSO and PC needs throughout the patient's journey.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mapping Psychosocial Screening to Services for Children With Cancer
NCT04132856
Cancer
COMPLETED
NA
Developing and Implementing E-psychotherapy Program for Mental Health Challenges in Oncology and Palliative Care
NCT04664270
Mental Health Issue
Depression
Anxiety
+2 more
RECRUITING
NA
Development and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Consult for Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer
NCT02836769
Head and Neck Neoplasms
COMPLETED
NA
Investigating the Impact of Proactive Palliative Care
NCT03667378
Metastatic Solid Tumor Cancers
Locally Advanced Solid Tumor Cancers
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Palliative and Oncology Care Intervention: Symptom COACH
NCT03760471
Cancer of Head and Neck
UNKNOWN
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Individuals with HNC experience a high burden of symptom-related distress (e.g. emotional, physical, psychological, spiritual etc.). Additionally, HNC patients may experience facial disfigurement, communication barriers, social stigma, lack of social support, and/or self-imposed or experienced disease stigma. The presence of depression, anxiety or social difficulty is relatively common in HNC patients yet less than half of those with significant distress access psychosocial (PSO) and palliative care (PC). Few studies have examined a systematic response to reducing distress, integrating a routine psychosocial and palliative care approach to oncology, with planning for future care for this population.
Most cancer centres do not have a systematic model of practice geared towards distress screening, PC and PSO approach to care. Therefore, determining how to best incorporate PSO and PC (PSOPC) into the interprofessional oncology clinic management of patients with HNC remains an important and unanswered question. The question remains of how to proactively identify those at higher risk for distress and greater need for specialized psychosocial or palliative care. Some oncologists consider the provision of PSOPC as an integral part of their professional role. Yet increasing the delivery of quality primary PSOPC by busy oncologists may require targeted training, the use of algorithms to prompt PC and PSO assessment, incorporating response to distress screening / advanced care planning tools into routine clinical processes, prompts to document conversations about illness understanding and consideration of individual factors influencing treatment decisions.
The primary goal of this study is to integrate quality primary level PSO and PC into clinic care by developing and evaluating a routine response to screening in hopes of increasing documentation of the following: discussion of response to ESAS, illness understanding, advanced care planning or goals of care conversations.
Specifically, this study will examine the impact of Cancer Care Ontario's (CCO) PSOPC Pathway, an expert panel recommended algorithm for assessing and managing symptoms and initiating a PSOPC approach and timely specialized referral, when necessary.
Phase Two: Randomized Controlled Trial
After completing the needs assessment and interprofessional team training in PSO and PC, an RCT will be used to examine the impact of using a standardized PSOPC pathway approach, prompted follow up with patients and documentation. Participants will be recruited and randomized into care as usual group and "intervention" PSOPC pathway group.
Main Hypothesis:
It is hypothesized that compared to treatment as usual, the PSOPC pathway intervention group will result in an increase in (larger proportion of):
Rationale and Objective:
Innovation: Model of clinical service delivery Currently, there is no standardized process for meeting the psychosocial and palliative care needs of HNC. This project promotes learner,needs-driven professional development, and knowledge translation. It will foster a person-focused, results-driven, integrated and sustainable model of clinical service delivery.
Individual clinics and cancer centres have developed their own responses to Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) distress screening. However, we believe this project is a unique Oncology Team/PC/PSO/Patient Advisor collaboration, where all members will work together to improve symptom assessment and management, improve discussions and documentation involving illness understanding and advanced care planning to better meet PSO and PC needs, whilst assessing the role for the PSOPC Pathway.
An additional innovation for this project is to develop and evaluate a customizable approach to assessing the needs of an oncology team, thereby shaping both professional development experiences and determining a model of care delivery that should be acceptable within the clinic frame.
Improving Healthcare and Patient Experience:
The CCO PSOPC pathway was designed to guide improvements in the provision of primary PSOPC Care, including symptom response, communication, illness understanding, advanced care planning, as well as increased identification of those who require access to specialized PSO and PC beyond the skill set of the oncology team. An inaccurate illness understanding (whether the cancer is curable or not and whether it is progressing) hinders informed discussions and decisions and supportive end of life planning. And, while some patients with moderate to severe ESAS ratings have their symptoms assessed and managed, this is not the case for all patients. Earlier advanced care planning discussions help patients and their families have a better understanding of the disease to make more personalized, informed decisions about care.
Most cancer centres do not have a systematic model of practice geared towards distress screening, PC and PSO approach to care. Therefore, determining how to best incorporate PSO and PC (PSOPC) into the interprofessional oncology clinic management of patients with HNC remains an important and unanswered question. The question remains of how to proactively identify those at higher risk for distress and greater need for specialized psychosocial or palliative care. Some oncologists consider the provision of PSOPC as an integral part of their professional role. Yet increasing the delivery of quality primary PSOPC by busy oncologists may require targeted training, the use of algorithms to prompt PC and PSO assessment, incorporating response to distress screening / advanced care planning tools into routine clinical processes, prompts to document conversations about illness understanding and consideration of individual factors influencing treatment decisions.
The primary goal of this study is to integrate quality primary level PSO and PC into clinic care by developing and evaluating a routine response to screening in hopes of increasing documentation of the following: discussion of response to ESAS, illness understanding, advanced care planning or goals of care conversations.
Specifically, this study will examine the impact of Cancer Care Ontario's (CCO) PSOPC Pathway, an expert panel recommended algorithm for assessing and managing symptoms and initiating a PSOPC approach and timely specialized referral, when necessary.
Phase Two: Randomized Controlled Trial
After completing the needs assessment and interprofessional team training in PSO and PC, an RCT will be used to examine the impact of using a standardized PSOPC pathway approach, prompted follow up with patients and documentation. Participants will be recruited and randomized into care as usual group and "intervention" PSOPC pathway group.
Main Hypothesis:
It is hypothesized that compared to treatment as usual, the PSOPC pathway intervention group will result in an increase in (larger proportion of):
Rationale and Objective:
Innovation: Model of clinical service delivery Currently, there is no standardized process for meeting the psychosocial and palliative care needs of HNC. This project promotes learner,needs-driven professional development, and knowledge translation. It will foster a person-focused, results-driven, integrated and sustainable model of clinical service delivery.
Individual clinics and cancer centres have developed their own responses to Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) distress screening. However, we believe this project is a unique Oncology Team/PC/PSO/Patient Advisor collaboration, where all members will work together to improve symptom assessment and management, improve discussions and documentation involving illness understanding and advanced care planning to better meet PSO and PC needs, whilst assessing the role for the PSOPC Pathway.
An additional innovation for this project is to develop and evaluate a customizable approach to assessing the needs of an oncology team, thereby shaping both professional development experiences and determining a model of care delivery that should be acceptable within the clinic frame.
Improving Healthcare and Patient Experience:
The CCO PSOPC pathway was designed to guide improvements in the provision of primary PSOPC Care, including symptom response, communication, illness understanding, advanced care planning, as well as increased identification of those who require access to specialized PSO and PC beyond the skill set of the oncology team. An inaccurate illness understanding (whether the cancer is curable or not and whether it is progressing) hinders informed discussions and decisions and supportive end of life planning. And, while some patients with moderate to severe ESAS ratings have their symptoms assessed and managed, this is not the case for all patients. Earlier advanced care planning discussions help patients and their families have a better understanding of the disease to make more personalized, informed decisions about care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Head and Neck Cancer
Supportive Care
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Randomized Controlled Trial
After completing HNC staff interprofessional team training in PSO and PC, an RCT will be used to examine the impact of using a standardized PSOPC pathway approach, prompted follow up with patients and documentation. Participants will be recruited and randomized into (1) care as usual group and (2) "intervention" PSOPC pathway group.
After completing HNC staff interprofessional team training in PSO and PC, an RCT will be used to examine the impact of using a standardized PSOPC pathway approach, prompted follow up with patients and documentation. Participants will be recruited and randomized into (1) care as usual group and (2) "intervention" PSOPC pathway group.
Primary Study Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment as Usual Control Group
Treatment as usual.
Group Type
NO_INTERVENTION
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention Group
Use of a standardized PSOPC pathway approach, prompted follow up with patients and documentation.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
PSOPC pathway approach
Intervention Type
OTHER
The intervention will use a standardized PSOPC pathway approach, prompted follow up with patients and documentation.
Additionally, clinicians will be prompted to document conversations about response to emotional or physical ESAS symptom scores, symptom management plan (self/education/monitoring/medication), illness understanding; and, if necessary, an offer of PSO/PC referral.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PSOPC pathway approach
The intervention will use a standardized PSOPC pathway approach, prompted follow up with patients and documentation.
Additionally, clinicians will be prompted to document conversations about response to emotional or physical ESAS symptom scores, symptom management plan (self/education/monitoring/medication), illness understanding; and, if necessary, an offer of PSO/PC referral.
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Consenting ambulatory OCC HNC patients, with baseline ESAS scores of \>2 (emotional) or \>3 (physical symptoms) with no active suicidal ideation, cognitive impairment or significant debilitation such that participation would be burdensome for participants and/or safety concerns as determined by a research assistant.
Exclusion Criteria
* If participants endorse thoughts of dying at baseline, they will be asked to complete semi-structured questions to assess suicidal ideation (SI). If there is any active SI or intent, the oncology team will be informed, a record kept and the participant will be withdrawn from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
65 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Janet Ellis, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Canada
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ortholan C, Benezery K, Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, Bozec A, Guiochet N, Belkacemi Y. A specific approach for elderly patients with head and neck cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2011 Aug;22(7):647-55. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e328344282a.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Argiris A, Karamouzis MV, Raben D, Ferris RL. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2008 May 17;371(9625):1695-709. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60728-X.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Devins GM, Payne AY, Lebel S, Mah K, Lee RN, Irish J, Wong J, Rodin GM. The burden of stress in head and neck cancer. Psychooncology. 2013 Mar;22(3):668-76. doi: 10.1002/pon.3050. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Burlein-Hall, S. (January 2015). Unpublished data from Odette Cancer Centre symptom screening audit.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rhoten BA, Deng J, Dietrich MS, Murphy B, Ridner SH. Body image and depressive symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer: an important relationship. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Nov;22(11):3053-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2312-2. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lebel S, Castonguay M, Mackness G, Irish J, Bezjak A, Devins GM. The psychosocial impact of stigma in people with head and neck or lung cancer. Psychooncology. 2013 Jan;22(1):140-52. doi: 10.1002/pon.2063. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Weiner B, Perry RP, Magnusson J. An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Nov;55(5):738-48. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.55.5.738.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Else-Quest NM, LoConte NK, Schiller JH, Hyde JS. Perceived stigma, self-blame, and adjustment among lung, breast and prostate cancer patients. Psychol Health. 2009 Oct;24(8):949-64. doi: 10.1080/08870440802074664.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bultz BD, Waller A, Cullum J, Jones P, Halland J, Groff SL, Leckie C, Shirt L, Blanchard S, Lau H, Easaw J, Fassbender K, Carlson LE. Implementing routine screening for distress, the sixth vital sign, for patients with head and neck and neurologic cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 Oct 1;11(10):1249-61. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0147.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Bjordal K, Biorklund A, Evensen J, Boysen M, Jannert M, Kaasa S, Sullivan M, Westin T. A prospective multicentre study in Sweden and Norway of mental distress and psychiatric morbidity in head and neck cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1999 May;80(5-6):766-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690420.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Oishi A, Murtagh FE. The challenges of uncertainty and interprofessional collaboration in palliative care for non-cancer patients in the community: a systematic review of views from patients, carers and health-care professionals. Palliat Med. 2014 Oct;28(9):1081-98. doi: 10.1177/0269216314531999. Epub 2014 May 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vigano A, Dorgan M, Buckingham J, Bruera E, Suarez-Almazor ME. Survival prediction in terminal cancer patients: a systematic review of the medical literature. Palliat Med. 2000 Sep;14(5):363-74. doi: 10.1191/026921600701536192.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cancer Quality Council of Ontario. Access to Psychosocial Oncology Service (2016.) http://www.csqi.on.ca/by_patients_journey/diagnosis/acess_to_psychosocial_oncology_services/
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dansky Ullmann C, Harlan LC, Shavers VL, Stevens JL. A population-based study of therapy and survival for patients with head and neck cancer treated in the community. Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4452-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27419. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Turnbull Macdonald GC, Baldassarre F, Brown P, Hatton-Bauer J, Li M, Green E, Lebel S. Psychosocial care for cancer: a framework to guide practice, and actionable recommendations for Ontario. Curr Oncol. 2012 Aug;19(4):209-16. doi: 10.3747/co.19.981.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cancer Care Ontario (2013) Psychosocial Oncology & Palliative Care Pathway: Disease Pathway Management. https://www.cancercare.on.ca/ocs/qpi/dispathmgmt/disease_pathway_maps/psychosocial_palliative_pathway/
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Buchmann L, Conlee J, Hunt J, Agarwal J, White S. Psychosocial distress is prevalent in head and neck cancer patients. Laryngoscope. 2013 Jun;123(6):1424-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.23886. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Carlson LE, Waller A, Groff SL, Bultz BD. Screening for distress, the sixth vital sign, in lung cancer patients: effects on pain, fatigue, and common problems--secondary outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2013 Aug;22(8):1880-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.3223. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ellis J, Lin J, Walsh A, Lo C, Shepherd FA, Moore M, Li M, Gagliese L, Zimmermann C, Rodin G. Predictors of referral for specialized psychosocial oncology care in patients with metastatic cancer: the contributions of age, distress, and marital status. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 10;27(5):699-705. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4864. Epub 2008 Dec 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Canadian Cancer Society's Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2015. Toronto, On: Canadian Cancer Society;2015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Akechi T, Okuyama T, Sugawara Y, Nakano T, Shima Y, Uchitomi Y. Major depression, adjustment disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder in terminally ill cancer patients: associated and predictive factors. J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1957-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.149.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kugaya A, Akechi T, Okuyama T, Nakano T, Mikami I, Okamura H, Uchitomi Y. Prevalence, predictive factors, and screening for psychologic distress in patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2000 Jun 15;88(12):2817-23. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:123.0.co;2-n.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Derogatis LR, Morrow GR, Fetting J, Penman D, Piasetsky S, Schmale AM, Henrichs M, Carnicke CL Jr. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients. JAMA. 1983 Feb 11;249(6):751-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.249.6.751.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):19-28. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:13.0.co;2-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shim EJ, Shin YW, Jeon HJ, Hahm BJ. Distress and its correlates in Korean cancer patients: pilot use of the distress thermometer and the problem list. Psychooncology. 2008 Jun;17(6):548-55. doi: 10.1002/pon.1275.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lam WW, Shing YT, Bonanno GA, Mancini AD, Fielding R. Distress trajectories at the first year diagnosis of breast cancer in relation to 6 years survivorship. Psychooncology. 2012 Jan;21(1):90-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1876. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Von Essen L, Larsson G, Oberg K, Sjoden PO. 'Satisfaction with care': associations with health-related quality of life and psychosocial function among Swedish patients with endocrine gastrointestinal tumours. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002 Jun;11(2):91-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00293.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Onitilo AA, Nietert PJ, Egede LE. Effect of depression on all-cause mortality in adults with cancer and differential effects by cancer site. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006 Sep-Oct;28(5):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.05.006.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Faller H, Bulzebruck H, Drings P, Lang H. Coping, distress, and survival among patients with lung cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;56(8):756-62. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.8.756.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Singer S, Krauss O, Keszte J, Siegl G, Papsdorf K, Severi E, Hauss J, Briest S, Dietz A, Brahler E, Kortmann RD. Predictors of emotional distress in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2012 Feb;34(2):180-7. doi: 10.1002/hed.21702. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Krebber AM, Jansen F, Cuijpers P, Leemans CR, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Screening for psychological distress in follow-up care to identify head and neck cancer patients with untreated distress. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jun;24(6):2541-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-3053-6. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Merckaert I, Libert Y, Messin S, Milani M, Slachmuylder JL, Razavi D. Cancer patients' desire for psychological support: prevalence and implications for screening patients' psychological needs. Psychooncology. 2010 Feb;19(2):141-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1568.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Junn JC, Kim IA, Zahurak ML, Tan M, Fan KY, Lake ST, Zaboli D, Messing BP, Ulmer K, Harrer KB, Gold D, Ryniak KL, Zinreich ES, Tang M, Levine MA, Blanco RG, Saunders JR, Califano JA, Ha PK. Multidisciplinary service utilization pattern by advanced head and neck cancer patients: a single institution study. Int J Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:628578. doi: 10.1155/2012/628578. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cancer Care Ontario (2009). A Quality Initiative of the Program in Evidence-Based care (PEBC), Cancer care Ontario (CCO): The Management of Head and Neck Cancer in Ontario. https://www.cancercare.on.ca/cmmon.pages/userfile.aspx?fileld=58592
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cancer Quality Council of Ontario. Symptom Assessment and Management (2015). https://www.csqi.on.ca/by_patient_journey/treatment/symptom_assessment_and_managment/
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Madeline Li, manuscript in preparation
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Weeks JC, Cook EF, O'Day SJ, Peterson LM, Wenger N, Reding D, Harrell FE, Kussin P, Dawson NV, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J, Phillips RS. Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA. 1998 Jun 3;279(21):1709-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.21.1709.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Myers J, Kim A, Flanagan J, Selby D. Palliative performance scale and survival among outpatients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Apr;23(4):913-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2440-8. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Glare PA, Sinclair CT. Palliative medicine review: prognostication. J Palliat Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;11(1):84-103. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.9992.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Temel JS, Greer JA, Admane S, Gallagher ER, Jackson VA, Lynch TJ, Lennes IT, Dahlin CM, Pirl WF. Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized study of early palliative care. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 10;29(17):2319-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4459. Epub 2011 May 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cancer Care Ontario (2013) Palliative Care Collaborative Plans CCPS: Condensed Version. https:// www.cancercare.on.ca/common.pages/UserFile.aspx?fileld=57766
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Anderson F, Downing GM, Hill J, Casorso L, Lerch N. Palliative performance scale (PPS): a new tool. J Palliat Care. 1996 Spring;12(1):5-11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bainbridge D, Seow H, Sussman J, Pond G, Martelli-Reid L, Herbert C, Evans W. Multidisciplinary health care professionals' perceptions of the use and utility of a symptom assessment system for oncology patients. J Oncol Pract. 2011 Jan;7(1):19-23. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2010.000015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Palliative Performance Scale (PPSv2). Medical Care of the Dying,4th ed.; p120. Copyright Victoria Hospice Society,2006. http://www.victoriahospice.org/ed_publications.html accessed November 25,2015
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ripamonti CI, Bandieri E, Pessi MA, Maruelli A, Buonaccorso L, Miccinesi G. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) as a screening tool for depression and anxiety in non-advanced patients with solid or haematological malignancies on cure or follow-up. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Mar;22(3):783-93. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2034-x. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Abdollahzadeh F, Sadat Aghahossini S, Rahmani A, Asvadi Kermani I. Quality of life in cancer patients and its related factors. J Caring Sci. 2012 May 27;1(2):109-14. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2012.016. eCollection 2012 Jun.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lowe B, Unutzer J, Callahan CM, Perkins AJ, Kroenke K. Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9. Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1194-201. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00006.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ruiz MA, Zamorano E, Garcia-Campayo J, Pardo A, Freire O, Rejas J. Validity of the GAD-7 scale as an outcome measure of disability in patients with generalized anxiety disorders in primary care. J Affect Disord. 2011 Feb;128(3):277-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.010. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bitar R, Bezjak A, Mah K, Loblaw DA, Gotowiec AP, Devins GM. Does tumor status influence cancer patients' satisfaction with the doctor-patient interaction? Support Care Cancer. 2004 Jan;12(1):34-40. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0534-9. Epub 2003 Oct 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Haisfield-Wolfe ME, McGuire DB, Soeken K, Geiger-Brown J, De Forge BR. Prevalence and correlates of depression among patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of implications for research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 May;36(3):E107-25. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.E107-E125.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Epstein AS, Prigerson HG, O'Reilly EM, Maciejewski PK. Discussions of Life Expectancy and Changes in Illness Understanding in Patients With Advanced Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2398-403. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.6696. Epub 2016 May 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Krebber AM, Leemans CR, de Bree R, van Straten A, Smit F, Smit EF, Becker A, Eeckhout GM, Beekman AT, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Stepped care targeting psychological distress in head and neck and lung cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Cancer. 2012 May 10;12:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-173.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
267-2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Improving Quality of Life of Children With Cancer Through Psychosocial Screening
NCT02788604
COMPLETED
NA
Psychosocial Support for Cancer Patients
NCT00133965
COMPLETED
SONICS - Effectiveness of Specialist Oncology Nursing
NCT00182234
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Management for Canadian Elders With Cancer
NCT03154671
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluating Quality and Cost of (Partial) Oncological Home-Hospitalization
NCT03668275
COMPLETED
NA
Feasibility of Health Coaching in Cancer Patients
NCT02556528
COMPLETED
NA
Stepped Care - Optimising Psycho-oncological Care Provision by Structured Screening and Diagnosis
NCT01859429
COMPLETED
NA
Patient and Caregiver Priorities in Neuro-oncology Care
NCT06676306
RECRUITING
Evaluating the Effects of Psycho-oncological Education on Distress and Quality of Life in Solid Tumor Cancer Patients
NCT02370836
COMPLETED
NA
Can a Person-centred-care Intervention Improve Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
NCT02982746
COMPLETED
NA
Building Caregiver Skills Using a Simulation-based Intervention for Care of Head and Neck Cancer
NCT02577237
COMPLETED
NA
Improving Quality of Life Through the Routine Use of the Patient Concerns Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer Patients
NCT03086629
COMPLETED
NA
Impact in Head and Neck Oncology of Support by a Nurse in the Patient's Care Pathway
NCT06203808
RECRUITING
Cannabis For Cancer-Related Symptoms
NCT03948074
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Telemedicine Clinic for Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT03413865
UNKNOWN
NA
Early Palliative Care for Patients with Oral Cancer in Sri Lanka
NCT06726317
COMPLETED
NA
GYNecologic Cancer-Related COGnitive Impairment
NCT06662435
RECRUITING
NA
Improving Care After Chemotherapy
NCT01944137
COMPLETED
NA
Sense of Security With Access to Palliative Outpatient Clinic
NCT06393569
RECRUITING
Improving Communication in Older Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers
NCT02107443
COMPLETED
NA
Survivorship After HNC: A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Patient Care and Adherence to Follow-up
NCT06127784
RECRUITING
NA
Randomized Controlled Trial of a E-intervention to Help Patients Newly Diagnosed With Cancer Cope Better: Pilot Study
NCT03651570
UNKNOWN
NA
Quality of Life and Development of Measures in Patients With Cancer of the Oral Cavity
NCT00582413
COMPLETED
The Impact of a Patient Education Intervention for Ambulatory Oncology Patients
NCT02038114
COMPLETED
NA
The Effects of Multi-Psycho-Oncology Care Courses
NCT05776680
RECRUITING
NA