Improving Quality of Life Through the Routine Use of the Patient Concerns Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT03086629
Last Updated: 2023-01-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
416 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-31
2020-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The overarching aim of the proposed research is to explore whether the routine use of the PCI in review clinics during the first year following head and neck cancer treatment can improve patients quality of life.
The primary outcome is an improvement in QOL. Secondary outcomes are:
social-emotional scale, distress thermometer and health economics.
This will be a pragmatic cluster randomised control trial with consultants randomised to either 'using or 'not using' the PCI at clinic. It will involve two centres. 416 patients from at least 10 consultant clusters are required to show a clinically meaningful difference in the primary outcome.
Intervention; Patient completion of the PCI and its inclusion into the regular review clinic consultation is the 'intervention' and is compared to standard out-patient follow-up. The pre-consultation questionnaires and PCI will be used from the first post-treatment clinic (i.e. baseline) onwards for one year. Completion of all pre-consultation questionnaires and the PCI is by computer (IPAD).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Quality-Of-Life Assessment in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy
NCT01210872
Pain Related to Head and Neck Cancer (HNC); Implementation and Evaluation of Self-care Measure Due to the Same Illness
NCT03089736
Can a Person-centred-care Intervention Improve Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
NCT02982746
Investigation of Pain and Symptom Burden in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer
NCT00655005
Nurse-led Follow-up Care for Head and Neck Cancer Patients
NCT01167179
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The overarching aim of the proposed research is to explore whether the routine use of the PCI in review clinics during the first year following head and neck cancer treatment can improve patients quality of life.
The primary outcome is the percentage of participants with less than good overall quality of life at the final one-year clinic as measured by the single UWQOLv4 question.
Secondary outcomes at one-year are the mean social-emotional subscale (UWQOLv4) score, Distress Thermometer (DT) score ≥4, and key health economic measures (QALY-EQ-5D-5L; CSRI).
This will be a pragmatic cluster randomised control trial with consultants randomised to either 'using or 'not using' the PCI at clinic. It will involve two centres. 416 patients recruited from 14 MFU and ENT consultants are required to show a clinically meaningful difference in the primary outcome.
Intervention: Patient completion of the PCI and its inclusion into the regular review clinic consultation is the 'intervention' and is compared to standard out-patient follow-up. The pre-consultation questionnaires and PCI will be used from the first post-treatment clinic (i.e. baseline) onwards for one year. Completion of all pre-consultation questionnaires and the PCI is by computer (IPAD).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PCI Group
Participants who are patients of consultants randomized to this group will use the PCI during clinics.
Patient Concerns Inventory
Non PCI Group
Participants who are patients of consultants randomized to this group will not use the PCI during clinics.
No Patient Concerns Inventory
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient Concerns Inventory
No Patient Concerns Inventory
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* To be treated curatively (all sites, stage of disease, treatments).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a recurrence.
* Patients with a history of cognitive impairment, psychoses or dementia
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
OTHER_GOV
Bangor University
OTHER
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Helens & Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospitals Nhs Trust
Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kanatas A, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Health-related quality of life at 3 months following head and neck cancer treatment is a key predictor of longer-term outcome and of benefit from using the patient concerns inventory. Cancer Med. 2022 Apr;11(8):1879-1890. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4558. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
Ezeofor V', Spencer LH, Rogers SN, Kanatas A, Lowe D, Semple CJ, Hanna JR, Yeo ST, Edwards RT. An Economic Evaluation Supported by Qualitative Data About the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) versus Standard Treatment Pathway in the Management of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 May;6(3):389-403. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00320-4. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
Rogers SN, Lowe D, Lowies C, Yeo ST, Allmark C, Mcavery D, Humphris GM, Flavel R, Semple C, Thomas SJ, Kanatas A. Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 18;18(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4355-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16/NW/0465
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.