Can a Person-centred-care Intervention Improve Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02982746

Last Updated: 2016-12-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

At all of the follow-ups, including the worst period (between four and ten weeks), the intervention group reported higher scores than the control group, suggesting in this RCT that adopting the person-centred-care concept was a promising way to improve function and wellbeing in patients with HNC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: The incidence of head and neck cancer (HNC) is increasing slightly. HNC and its treatment may affect general domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and provoke a variety of adverse symptoms and side effects, both during and after treatment. The objective of this study was to compare a person-centred care intervention in terms of HRQoL, disease-specific symptoms or problems, with traditional care as a control group for patients with HNC. Methods: The intervention and control groups comprised 54 and 42 patients, respectively. Outcome measures used were: the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-C35. Both groups answered the questionnaires at baseline and after 4, 10, 18 and 52 weeks from start of treatment. The questionnaires' scores were compared between groups by using independent samples test (Student's t-test) and non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U Test) for continuous variables. For categorical data, Fisher's exact test was used. Longitudinal data were analysed using repeated measures in covariance pattern models. Results: At baseline, the intervention and control groups were comparable in terms of medical and sociodemographic variables, clinical characteristics, HRQoL and disease-specific symptoms or problems. At all the follow-up points, even during the worst period for the patients, the person-centred-care group consistently reported higher scores than the control group. The differences were numerically but not always statistically significant. When using repeated measures in covariance pattern models, statistically significant results were found for HNC-specific problems, swallowing (p= 0.014), social eating (p=0.048) and feeling ill (p=0.021).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health Related Quality of Life

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Head and neck cancer Person Centred Care Health related quality of life EORTC QLQ-C30 EORTC QLQ-C35

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

gPCC-G (Gothenburg Person Centred Care) Group

gPCC-G Patients randomized to the intervention group were contacted and scheduled to attend a meeting at the oncology clinic with the nurse specialist in oncology

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

gPCC (Gothenburg Person Centred Care)

Intervention Type OTHER

Control group

Control Group Patients randomized to the control group received usual care and return visits were scheduled according to the treatment procedure described under the previous heading and based on the Regional care program for patients with HNC. CG patients were recruited at the same time and in the same way as those in the intervention group

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

gPCC (Gothenburg Person Centred Care)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Eligible for this study were patients diagnosed with HNC, older than 18 years and able to read and write Swedish and, in addition, suitable for outpatient treatment with chemo- and/or radiotherapy, either as primary treatment or in a postoperative setting.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients were excluded if they had a previous or concomitant malignancy or were diagnosed and treated for depression as stated in their medical record.
* In order to minimize the risk of bias, none of the patients were to be included if they were taking part in other research studies
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Göteborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gyllensten H, Koinberg I, Carlstrom E, Olsson LE, Hansson Olofsson E. Economic evaluation of a person-centred care intervention in head and neck oncology: results from a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1825-1834. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4436-2. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30171334 (View on PubMed)

Hansson E, Carlstrom E, Olsson LE, Nyman J, Koinberg I. Can a person-centred-care intervention improve health-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer? A randomized, controlled study. BMC Nurs. 2017 Feb 21;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0206-6. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28239295 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

University of Gothenburgh

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id