Responsiveness Index Versus the RASS Based Method for Adjusting Sedation in Critically Ill Patients

NCT ID: NCT03250481

Last Updated: 2019-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2017-08-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Systematic evaluation of pain, agitation and delirium in ICU-patients is recommended and deep sedation should be avoided. Sedation is still monitored with clinical assessments, like RASS. The Responsiveness Index (RI) is a recently described method for ICU sedation monitoring. It is based on processed frontal EMG and reflects the interaction between a patient's conscious state and the intensity and frequency of stimulations during treatment. RI has not been randomly compared to RASS to titrate sedation to target at a clinically adequate sedation state. In this open randomized controlled pilot study of 32 critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients, investigators will evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of RI based sedation compared to standard RASS based titration of sedation. Investigators hypothesize first that RI controlled sedation will be safe and, second that RI controlled sedation will associate with increased number of ventilator free days alive in 30 days without excess adverse events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sedation of intensive care patients is needed for patient's safety but deep sedation is associated with adverse outcomes. Frontal electromyogram based Responsiveness Index (RI) aims to quantify patient's arousal. RI monitoring together with staff education may have potential to improve sedation quality. Investigators will evaluate the safety of RI based sedation versus standard care using Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) for sedation.

Methods: randomized study, critically ill adult patients with mechanical ventilation and administration of sedation to either RI- or RASS-guided sedation. Propofol (and midazolam combined with if needed) as a hypnotic drug and oxycodone as an analgesic drug. Investigators will follow standardized sedation protocol in both groups to achieve the predetermined target sedation level: either RI 40-80 (RI-group) or RASS -3-0 (RASS group). RI measurement is continuous in both groups, but blinded in the RASS group. Accordingly, RI group is blinded to RASS assessments. State Entropy (SE) will register in both groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

'Sedation guidance with RASS-group

Sedation is guided with RASS. Targeted sedation level is RASS -3 - 0. Propofol: an initial rate of 2.4 mg/kg/h for one hour. Thereafter, the infusion rate of propofol is 0.8-4 mg/kg/h to reach or maintain the target RASS score. Propofol bolus of 20-40 mg is allowed. Oxycodone as 3-6 mg boluses for pain management. Other opiates are not allowed. Midazolam may given if the maximum dose of propofol is reached and pain management by oxycodone restricted achievement of the target sedation level. Midazolam will supply intravenously in boluses of 1-2 mg (based on the weight of the patient), starting at 3 boluses/h for the first hour. Dexmedetomidine and other sedatives are not allowed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Sedation targeted to RASS -3-0 or RI 20-40

'Sedation guidance with RI

Sedation is guided with RI. Targeted sedation level is RI 40-80. Propofol: an initial rate of 2.4 mg/kg/h for one hour. Thereafter, the infusion rate of propofol is 0.8-4 mg/kg/h to reach or maintain the target RI score. Propofol bolus of 20-40 mg is allowed. Oxycodone as 3-6 mg boluses for pain management. Other opiates are not allowed. Midazolam may given if the maximum dose of propofol is reached and pain management by oxycodone restricted achievement of the target sedation level. Midazolam will supply intravenously in boluses of 1-2 mg (based on the weight of the patient), starting at 3 boluses/h for the first hour. Dexmedetomidine and other sedatives are not allowed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Sedation targeted to RASS -3-0 or RI 20-40

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Propofol

Sedation targeted to RASS -3-0 or RI 20-40

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Oxycodone Midazolame

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Intensive care patients
* Need of mechanical ventilation and sedation

Exclusion Criteria

* contraindication to propofol or oxycodone
* hypoxic or traumatic brain injury
* intracranial hemorrhage
* status epilepticus
* drug overdose as admission diagnosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ville Pettilä

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Johanna Wennervirta, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 340, 00029 Helsinki, Finland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HelsinkiUCH

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HelsinkiUCHFin

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ketamine Versus Propofol as ICU Sedation
NCT06243822 COMPLETED PHASE4
Propofol Sedation Study
NCT00597740 COMPLETED