Evaluation of Decision Capacity of ICU Patients Under Sedatives. A Prospective Observational Multicenter Study.

NCT ID: NCT04193540

Last Updated: 2019-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-15

Study Completion Date

2020-08-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective observational multicenter study is intended to investigate the impact of sedatives on the decision capacity of intensive care units patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Medicine has recently turned from paternalism to patient-centered decisions giving them back autonomy to determine their own treatments and end-of-life directives. Main prerequisite is patient's competence to fully understand information given from medical staff, integrate it and resituate comprehensive willing.

Informed decision-making necessitates patient's ability to appropriately communicate and interact with its environment. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are often intubated -rendering oral communication impossible- and get sedated with various medications (hypnotics and opioids). Despite an apparently appropriate communication, some of them are confused. Confusion is regularly under diagnosed in ICU settings and necessitates specific tools to be detected, such as CAM-ICU (Confusion Assessment Method in ICU). While not confused, a patient might lack decision-making capacity, meaning that despite obvious communication, more elaborated cognitive function remains uncertain and often inappropriate. Decision-making capacity can be evaluated with dedicated scores such as the Johns Hopkins adapted cognitive examination (ACE). This score has recently been formally translated into French.

The influence of sedatives on decision-making capacity remains unknown to date. This prospective observational multicentre study is intended to investigate the impact of sedatives on the decision-making capacity of ICU patients. Furthermore, each sub-score of the ACE (orientation, language, registration, attention and calculation, and recall) will be investigated according to sedatives types. Patients' decision-making capacity will be clinically assessed by physician, resident and nurse in charge, blindly of ACE result.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intensive Care Unit Patient Mechanical Ventilation Sedatives Decision-making Capacity Confusion

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Intensive Care Unit patient Mechanical Ventilation Sedatives Decision-making capacity Confusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ACE questionnaire

Every patient under mechanical ventilation (intubated or tracheotomized), with or without sedatives, able to communicate and alert (RASS -1 to +1), and not delirious (CAM-ICU negative) will be assessed by Johns Hopkins ACE questionnaire by a person not in charge of the patient.

ACE questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Regardless of the result of the ACE questionnaire, physician, resident and nurse in charge of the patient will be asked their clinical opinion on decision-making capacity of the patient, based on a 4 steps Lickert scale and blindly of ACE result.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ACE questionnaire

Regardless of the result of the ACE questionnaire, physician, resident and nurse in charge of the patient will be asked their clinical opinion on decision-making capacity of the patient, based on a 4 steps Lickert scale and blindly of ACE result.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Mechanically ventilated patient (intubation or tracheotomy)
* Not delirious (negative CAM ICU)
* Calm and alert (RASS -1 to +1) since at least 12 hours and less than 72 hours
* Receiving sedatives and/or analgesics and/or medications interfering with neurological functions
* Adult patients with social security coverage

Exclusion Criteria

* Brain injured patients (traumatic brain injury, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, sub-arachnoid hemorrhage, intra-parenchymal bleeding, hypoxic post cardiac arrest)
* Known cognitive disorders (MMSE \< 20)
* Neurodegenerative disease
* Pregnant woman
* Protocol refusal by the patient or closest next-of-kin
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Godet

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lise Laclautre

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +33 4 73 754963

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Thomas Godet

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DEXCAP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id