Evaluation of Decision Capacity of ICU Patients Under Sedatives. A Prospective Observational Multicenter Study.
NCT ID: NCT04193540
Last Updated: 2019-12-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-07-15
2020-08-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Informed decision-making necessitates patient's ability to appropriately communicate and interact with its environment. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are often intubated -rendering oral communication impossible- and get sedated with various medications (hypnotics and opioids). Despite an apparently appropriate communication, some of them are confused. Confusion is regularly under diagnosed in ICU settings and necessitates specific tools to be detected, such as CAM-ICU (Confusion Assessment Method in ICU). While not confused, a patient might lack decision-making capacity, meaning that despite obvious communication, more elaborated cognitive function remains uncertain and often inappropriate. Decision-making capacity can be evaluated with dedicated scores such as the Johns Hopkins adapted cognitive examination (ACE). This score has recently been formally translated into French.
The influence of sedatives on decision-making capacity remains unknown to date. This prospective observational multicentre study is intended to investigate the impact of sedatives on the decision-making capacity of ICU patients. Furthermore, each sub-score of the ACE (orientation, language, registration, attention and calculation, and recall) will be investigated according to sedatives types. Patients' decision-making capacity will be clinically assessed by physician, resident and nurse in charge, blindly of ACE result.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ACE questionnaire
Every patient under mechanical ventilation (intubated or tracheotomized), with or without sedatives, able to communicate and alert (RASS -1 to +1), and not delirious (CAM-ICU negative) will be assessed by Johns Hopkins ACE questionnaire by a person not in charge of the patient.
ACE questionnaire
Regardless of the result of the ACE questionnaire, physician, resident and nurse in charge of the patient will be asked their clinical opinion on decision-making capacity of the patient, based on a 4 steps Lickert scale and blindly of ACE result.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ACE questionnaire
Regardless of the result of the ACE questionnaire, physician, resident and nurse in charge of the patient will be asked their clinical opinion on decision-making capacity of the patient, based on a 4 steps Lickert scale and blindly of ACE result.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Not delirious (negative CAM ICU)
* Calm and alert (RASS -1 to +1) since at least 12 hours and less than 72 hours
* Receiving sedatives and/or analgesics and/or medications interfering with neurological functions
* Adult patients with social security coverage
Exclusion Criteria
* Known cognitive disorders (MMSE \< 20)
* Neurodegenerative disease
* Pregnant woman
* Protocol refusal by the patient or closest next-of-kin
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas Godet
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Thomas Godet
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DEXCAP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id