Motor Evoked Potential in the Affected Upper Limb Predicts the Potential of Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT03243318
Last Updated: 2022-05-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
32 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-10-11
2021-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy & Safety of rTMS for Upper-limb Motor Function Recovery in Subcortical and Brainstem Stroke
NCT05535504
Adjunct Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With Physiotherapy Enhance Upper Extremity Function Restoration
NCT02490371
The Impact of Neuronavigation in rTMS for Hemiplegic Stroke Patients.
NCT07284017
Efficacy of Personalized Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol Based on Functional Reserve to Enhance Upper Limb Function in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT06270238
Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Sensory Cueing on Unilateral Neglect in Subacute Patients With Right Hemispheric Stroke
NCT02645344
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Presence of motor evoked potentials
Those patients with Shoulder Abduction and Finger Extension (SAFE) score \<8/10 with the presence of motor evoked potentials elicited by TMS over the ipsilesional motor cortex
MEPs induced by TMS
Using TMS induced MEPs over motor cortex of the affected side to predict motor recovery potentials
absence of motor evoked potentials
Those patients with Shoulder Abduction and Finger Extension (SAFE) score \<8/10 with the absence of motor evoked potentials elicited by TMS over the ipsilesional motor cortex
MEPs induced by TMS
Using TMS induced MEPs over motor cortex of the affected side to predict motor recovery potentials
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MEPs induced by TMS
Using TMS induced MEPs over motor cortex of the affected side to predict motor recovery potentials
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eric Man Pun Yeung
Doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Rehabilitation, Kowloon Hospital
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KHMEPsUL2017
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.