Effects of High Frequency rTMS Combined Motor Learning on Upper Limb Motor Function in Subacute Stroke

NCT ID: NCT05176613

Last Updated: 2022-01-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-13

Study Completion Date

2016-08-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is to present the effect of a program combining high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with motor learning on upper limb motor function and grip strength and activities of daily motion in patients with subacute stroke.

Purpose : This study was to investigate the effects of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with motor learning effects motor function and grip force for upper limbs and activities of daily living of subacute stroke patients.

Subjects : Thirty individuals with subacute stroke, satisfying the selection criteria, were selected for this study. Subject were randomly allocated into 14 high frequency repetitive transcarnial magnetic stimulation+motor learning group(experimental group), 16 sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation+motor learning group(control group).

Intervention : 12 sessions, 3d/wk, 4week Studies : upper limb functional assessment(FMA-U/L, BBT), hand grip force assessment(disital hand dynamometer), activities daily of living assessment(K-MBI) Evaluation : 1)pre test 2)post test

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke, Acute Hemiplegia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HF-rTMS and ML

High frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Motor Learning(Experimental group)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HF-rTMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

HF-rTMS stimulated a 70-mm, 8-shaped coil stimulator (The Magstim Company, UK, 2012) on the damaged cerebral cortex. Prior to the application of HF-rTMS, the motor point was identified that stimulates maximum thresholds on the primary motor cortex, causing flexion of the opposite index finger. If the cerebral hemisphere does not show a kinetic response even at the maximum stimulus, the motor point of the opposite hemisphere was found to be symmetrically changed. The intensity of the stimulus was 80% of the resting motor threshold, which means the motor eveked potential above which the first dorsal interosseous muscle can produce 50 μV more than five times out of 10 stimuli. The subject sat on a chair made to hold the head. The stimulation was stimulated at high frequency (10 Hz) for 2 seconds, and the rest was performed for 58 seconds for a total of 200 times for 10 minutes.

ML

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Motor learning was conducted for two minutes each in five sessions, and the first is the external rotation training to maximum range of the shoulder joint in sitting position. The second method is to stack cups by transferring them from the non-affected side to the affected side by transferring 25 plastic cups of five colors in sitting position with both hands inserted. Third, by pushing and pulling the ball forward and backward with the hands folded, the subject puts a 55 cm healing ball on the table in a sitting position, and pushes and pulls it forward with the upper limb. The fourth method is to insert and remove pegs from the peg board, and the target uses the affected side hand in sitting position. The fifth method is to tear a newspaper, in which the subject overlaps a newspaper on the table in a sitting position, holds it with the non-affected hand, and tears it with the hands of the damage. A total of 10 minutes of motor learning.

Sham-rTMS and ML

Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Motor Learning

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

ML

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Motor learning was conducted for two minutes each in five sessions, and the first is the external rotation training to maximum range of the shoulder joint in sitting position. The second method is to stack cups by transferring them from the non-affected side to the affected side by transferring 25 plastic cups of five colors in sitting position with both hands inserted. Third, by pushing and pulling the ball forward and backward with the hands folded, the subject puts a 55 cm healing ball on the table in a sitting position, and pushes and pulls it forward with the upper limb. The fourth method is to insert and remove pegs from the peg board, and the target uses the affected side hand in sitting position. The fifth method is to tear a newspaper, in which the subject overlaps a newspaper on the table in a sitting position, holds it with the non-affected hand, and tears it with the hands of the damage. A total of 10 minutes of motor learning.

Sham-rTMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham rTMS gives a small intensity of 2% of the resting motor threshold that cannot cause excitement in the motor cortex, and is set to listen to the same frequency of noise as HF-rTMS, and motor learning is applied equally. A total of 20 minutes were applied three times a week for four weeks by applying 10 minutes of Sham rTMS and 10 minutes of motor learning.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HF-rTMS

HF-rTMS stimulated a 70-mm, 8-shaped coil stimulator (The Magstim Company, UK, 2012) on the damaged cerebral cortex. Prior to the application of HF-rTMS, the motor point was identified that stimulates maximum thresholds on the primary motor cortex, causing flexion of the opposite index finger. If the cerebral hemisphere does not show a kinetic response even at the maximum stimulus, the motor point of the opposite hemisphere was found to be symmetrically changed. The intensity of the stimulus was 80% of the resting motor threshold, which means the motor eveked potential above which the first dorsal interosseous muscle can produce 50 μV more than five times out of 10 stimuli. The subject sat on a chair made to hold the head. The stimulation was stimulated at high frequency (10 Hz) for 2 seconds, and the rest was performed for 58 seconds for a total of 200 times for 10 minutes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

ML

Motor learning was conducted for two minutes each in five sessions, and the first is the external rotation training to maximum range of the shoulder joint in sitting position. The second method is to stack cups by transferring them from the non-affected side to the affected side by transferring 25 plastic cups of five colors in sitting position with both hands inserted. Third, by pushing and pulling the ball forward and backward with the hands folded, the subject puts a 55 cm healing ball on the table in a sitting position, and pushes and pulls it forward with the upper limb. The fourth method is to insert and remove pegs from the peg board, and the target uses the affected side hand in sitting position. The fifth method is to tear a newspaper, in which the subject overlaps a newspaper on the table in a sitting position, holds it with the non-affected hand, and tears it with the hands of the damage. A total of 10 minutes of motor learning.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sham-rTMS

Sham rTMS gives a small intensity of 2% of the resting motor threshold that cannot cause excitement in the motor cortex, and is set to listen to the same frequency of noise as HF-rTMS, and motor learning is applied equally. A total of 20 minutes were applied three times a week for four weeks by applying 10 minutes of Sham rTMS and 10 minutes of motor learning.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

High Frequency repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation(HF-rTMS) Motor Learning(ML) Sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation(Sham-rTMS)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hemiplegia from stroke
* Factors within six months of onset
* Found to have subcortex damage through diagnoses of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)
* Had motor defects on the damaged upper extremities
* Korean version Mini mental state examination(MMSE-K) score greater than 24 points

Exclusion Criteria

* Permanent damage such as heart vein
* Upper limb fractures
* Neurological damage such as Parkinson's, multiple sclerosis
* Other reasons limiting upper limb movement
* Epilepsy or family history of epilepsy
* wearing a metal tube in skull or pacemaker
* The lesion at occipital lobe
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

JungWoo Shim

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

JungWoo Shim, master

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chungnam National University Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016071HR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.