Effects of High Frequency rTMS Combined Motor Learning on Upper Limb Motor Function in Subacute Stroke
NCT ID: NCT05176613
Last Updated: 2022-01-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-13
2016-08-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Purpose : This study was to investigate the effects of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with motor learning effects motor function and grip force for upper limbs and activities of daily living of subacute stroke patients.
Subjects : Thirty individuals with subacute stroke, satisfying the selection criteria, were selected for this study. Subject were randomly allocated into 14 high frequency repetitive transcarnial magnetic stimulation+motor learning group(experimental group), 16 sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation+motor learning group(control group).
Intervention : 12 sessions, 3d/wk, 4week Studies : upper limb functional assessment(FMA-U/L, BBT), hand grip force assessment(disital hand dynamometer), activities daily of living assessment(K-MBI) Evaluation : 1)pre test 2)post test
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Personalized Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol Based on Functional Reserve to Enhance Upper Limb Function in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT06270238
The Efficacy & Safety of rTMS for Upper-limb Motor Function Recovery in Subcortical and Brainstem Stroke
NCT05535504
Adjunct Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With Physiotherapy Enhance Upper Extremity Function Restoration
NCT02490371
Effect of Cerebral and Cerebellar rTMS in Stroke Patient
NCT04570774
Efficacy and Safety Study of rTMS for Upper Extremity Motor Function Recovery in Ischemic Stroke Patients
NCT02082015
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HF-rTMS and ML
High frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Motor Learning(Experimental group)
HF-rTMS
HF-rTMS stimulated a 70-mm, 8-shaped coil stimulator (The Magstim Company, UK, 2012) on the damaged cerebral cortex. Prior to the application of HF-rTMS, the motor point was identified that stimulates maximum thresholds on the primary motor cortex, causing flexion of the opposite index finger. If the cerebral hemisphere does not show a kinetic response even at the maximum stimulus, the motor point of the opposite hemisphere was found to be symmetrically changed. The intensity of the stimulus was 80% of the resting motor threshold, which means the motor eveked potential above which the first dorsal interosseous muscle can produce 50 μV more than five times out of 10 stimuli. The subject sat on a chair made to hold the head. The stimulation was stimulated at high frequency (10 Hz) for 2 seconds, and the rest was performed for 58 seconds for a total of 200 times for 10 minutes.
ML
Motor learning was conducted for two minutes each in five sessions, and the first is the external rotation training to maximum range of the shoulder joint in sitting position. The second method is to stack cups by transferring them from the non-affected side to the affected side by transferring 25 plastic cups of five colors in sitting position with both hands inserted. Third, by pushing and pulling the ball forward and backward with the hands folded, the subject puts a 55 cm healing ball on the table in a sitting position, and pushes and pulls it forward with the upper limb. The fourth method is to insert and remove pegs from the peg board, and the target uses the affected side hand in sitting position. The fifth method is to tear a newspaper, in which the subject overlaps a newspaper on the table in a sitting position, holds it with the non-affected hand, and tears it with the hands of the damage. A total of 10 minutes of motor learning.
Sham-rTMS and ML
Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Motor Learning
ML
Motor learning was conducted for two minutes each in five sessions, and the first is the external rotation training to maximum range of the shoulder joint in sitting position. The second method is to stack cups by transferring them from the non-affected side to the affected side by transferring 25 plastic cups of five colors in sitting position with both hands inserted. Third, by pushing and pulling the ball forward and backward with the hands folded, the subject puts a 55 cm healing ball on the table in a sitting position, and pushes and pulls it forward with the upper limb. The fourth method is to insert and remove pegs from the peg board, and the target uses the affected side hand in sitting position. The fifth method is to tear a newspaper, in which the subject overlaps a newspaper on the table in a sitting position, holds it with the non-affected hand, and tears it with the hands of the damage. A total of 10 minutes of motor learning.
Sham-rTMS
Sham rTMS gives a small intensity of 2% of the resting motor threshold that cannot cause excitement in the motor cortex, and is set to listen to the same frequency of noise as HF-rTMS, and motor learning is applied equally. A total of 20 minutes were applied three times a week for four weeks by applying 10 minutes of Sham rTMS and 10 minutes of motor learning.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HF-rTMS
HF-rTMS stimulated a 70-mm, 8-shaped coil stimulator (The Magstim Company, UK, 2012) on the damaged cerebral cortex. Prior to the application of HF-rTMS, the motor point was identified that stimulates maximum thresholds on the primary motor cortex, causing flexion of the opposite index finger. If the cerebral hemisphere does not show a kinetic response even at the maximum stimulus, the motor point of the opposite hemisphere was found to be symmetrically changed. The intensity of the stimulus was 80% of the resting motor threshold, which means the motor eveked potential above which the first dorsal interosseous muscle can produce 50 μV more than five times out of 10 stimuli. The subject sat on a chair made to hold the head. The stimulation was stimulated at high frequency (10 Hz) for 2 seconds, and the rest was performed for 58 seconds for a total of 200 times for 10 minutes.
ML
Motor learning was conducted for two minutes each in five sessions, and the first is the external rotation training to maximum range of the shoulder joint in sitting position. The second method is to stack cups by transferring them from the non-affected side to the affected side by transferring 25 plastic cups of five colors in sitting position with both hands inserted. Third, by pushing and pulling the ball forward and backward with the hands folded, the subject puts a 55 cm healing ball on the table in a sitting position, and pushes and pulls it forward with the upper limb. The fourth method is to insert and remove pegs from the peg board, and the target uses the affected side hand in sitting position. The fifth method is to tear a newspaper, in which the subject overlaps a newspaper on the table in a sitting position, holds it with the non-affected hand, and tears it with the hands of the damage. A total of 10 minutes of motor learning.
Sham-rTMS
Sham rTMS gives a small intensity of 2% of the resting motor threshold that cannot cause excitement in the motor cortex, and is set to listen to the same frequency of noise as HF-rTMS, and motor learning is applied equally. A total of 20 minutes were applied three times a week for four weeks by applying 10 minutes of Sham rTMS and 10 minutes of motor learning.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Factors within six months of onset
* Found to have subcortex damage through diagnoses of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)
* Had motor defects on the damaged upper extremities
* Korean version Mini mental state examination(MMSE-K) score greater than 24 points
Exclusion Criteria
* Upper limb fractures
* Neurological damage such as Parkinson's, multiple sclerosis
* Other reasons limiting upper limb movement
* Epilepsy or family history of epilepsy
* wearing a metal tube in skull or pacemaker
* The lesion at occipital lobe
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
JungWoo Shim
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
JungWoo Shim, master
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chungnam National University Hospital
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016071HR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.