Promoting Influenza Vaccination In General Practice Waiting Rooms
NCT ID: NCT03239795
Last Updated: 2017-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10597 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-15
2017-05-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Registry based 2/1 cluster randomized controlled trial. Clusters gathered the listed patients over the age of 16 of 75 randomized FPs. The trial was conducted during the 2014-2015 influenza vaccination campaign. Intervention group, 25 FPs received and exposed in their waiting rooms pamphlets and one poster promoting the influenza vaccination campaign (added to the usual mandatory information). Control group (50 FPs), usual waiting room. The main outcome was the number of vaccination units delivered in pharmacies. Data were first extracted for 2013-2015 from the SIAM-ERASME claim database of the Health Insurance Fund of Lille-Douai (Northern France). The association between the intervention and the main outcome was assessed trough a generalized estimating equation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enabling Family Physicians to Reduce Vaccine Hesitancy and Increase Covid-19 Vaccine Uptake
NCT04963790
Reducing Children's Distress Towards Flu Vaccinations
NCT01529021
The Study Guide Cluster Randomized Control Trial
NCT03312218
Effectiveness of Pedialink CEASE Module
NCT01087177
Patient Agenda Setting and Clinic Efficiency in Outpatients
NCT03433729
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our aim is to evaluate the effect of the advertising campaign using posters and pamphlets in FPs' waiting rooms on patients behaviour measuring the number of influenza vaccination units delivered in community pharmacies.
We designed a single blinded 2/1 registry based cluster randomized controlled trial.
The outcome is the number of seasonal influenza vaccination sets released in community pharmacies. The target population are patients over the age of 65 or having a chronic disease requiring seasonal influenza immunization (like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or diabetes). Patients are informed about the anonymous use of their data and can refuse to participate at any time.
A cluster is defined as the patients over the age of 16, who are registered by the Health Insurance on the participating FPs' patients' lists. A computerized random draw is used to allocate FPs in each group. In the intervention group, FPs will receive and expose in their waiting rooms 135 pamphlets and one poster (added to the usual mandatory information) withdrawing all the other posters. In the control group, waiting rooms are kept in their usual state. To evaluate the number of FPs needed for the trial, we set an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.02, for α = 5% and β = 20%. With a predicted rate of influenza vaccination delivery of 0.65 in the intervention group and 0.60 in the control group, and a target size by FP of 400 patients, 75 FPs have to be enrolled (50 in the control group and 25 in the intervention group).
Baseline is defined as the 2013-2014 vaccination campaign. Data are extracted between October 15, 2014 and February 28, 2015 from the SIAM-ERASME claim database of the Lille-Douai district Health Insurance Fund on patient level. To assess the association between the vaccination status (dependent variable) and the group intervention/control, because of the hierarchical structure of the data and the high incidence rate of the main outcome, we will use a generalized estimating equation (GEE) Poisson regression clustering by GP; an exchangeable working correlation matrix will be used. The analysis will be carried out using R software (version 3.3.1) and the package Geepack.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
Family physicians' patients exposed to advertisement in waiting rooms consisting in a poster and pamphlets promoting seasonal influenza vaccination (+ usual mandatory information)
Advertisement
Advertisement by means of a poster and pamphlets in FP waiting rooms, removing all the other posters and pamphlets (except mandatory information, like opening hours, fees, etc.)
Control group
Family physicians' patients exposed to usual laying out of waiting rooms
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Advertisement
Advertisement by means of a poster and pamphlets in FP waiting rooms, removing all the other posters and pamphlets (except mandatory information, like opening hours, fees, etc.)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women
* Patients with a chronic long lasting disease needing yearly seasonal influenza immunization
* respiratory diseases: COPD, emphysema, asthma, silicosis, Bronchial dilatation, cystic fibrosis, other respiratory diseases at risk of influenza complications
* cardiovascular diseases: Congenital heart disease, heart failure, valvulopathy, rhythm disorder, coronary heart disease, stroke, infarction, coronary bypass
* neurologic diseases: Myopathy, multiple sclerosis, sequelae of stroke, dementia (Alzheimer or others), poliomyelitis, gravis, paraplegia or tetraplegia reaching the diaphragm
* kidney and liver diseases: severe kidney failure, nephrotic syndrome, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis
* metabolic disorders: diabetes, malignant obesity
* immunity disorders and blood diseases: cancer and other malignant diseases, organ and marrow transplantation, immune deficiency, Inflammatory and autoimmune diseases with immunosuppressive medication, HIV infection, sickle cell disease.
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Lille
OTHER
Christophe Berkhout
INDIV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christophe Berkhout
University Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christophe Berkhout, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Lille Univ. UDSL
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tuppin P, Choukroun S, Samson S, Weill A, Ricordeau P, Allemand H. [Vaccination against seasonal influenza in France in 2010 and 2011: decrease of coverage rates and associated factors]. Presse Med. 2012 Nov;41(11):e568-76. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jul 15. French.
Bohmer MM, Walter D, Falkenhorst G, Muters S, Krause G, Wichmann O. Barriers to pandemic influenza vaccination and uptake of seasonal influenza vaccine in the post-pandemic season in Germany. BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 31;12:938. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-938.
Wicke DM, Lorge RE, Coppin RJ, Jones KP. The effectiveness of waiting room notice-boards as a vehicle for health education. Fam Pract. 1994 Sep;11(3):292-5. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.3.292.
Ward K, Hawthorne K. Do patients read health promotion posters in the waiting room? A study in one general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Dec;44(389):583-5.
Gignon M, Idris H, Manaouil C, Ganry O. The waiting room: vector for health education? The general practitioner's point of view. BMC Res Notes. 2012 Sep 18;5:511. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-511.
Austin PC. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes. Stat Med. 2007 Aug 30;26(19):3550-65. doi: 10.1002/sim.2813.
Eubelen C, Brendel F, Belche JL, Freyens A, Vanbelle S, Giet D. Effect of an audiovisual message for tetanus booster vaccination broadcast in the waiting room. BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Sep 28;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-104.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HP 14/51
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
1783641 v 0
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.